Yes, that is what we are doing currently in this thread.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism# ... _criticism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism# ... _criticism
forum
We constructively criticize the person above.
posted
Total Posts
41
Topic Starter
Perhaps you could have added a blurb before the link, mentioning that persons who are unsure of what constructive criticism is should click the link to find out?
If it's possible, could you at least mention what we are supposed to do with your maps in that spoilerbox?
Don't use a lossy format for avatars, dolt.
IppE
A signature is not an avatar. Furthermore, strager is very much alive. It would be a good idea to amend your signature to suit this.
Your signature is quite cluttered and unappealing to the eye. It would help if you removed that link and instead had the image be linked to that page.
You are cntradicting yourself in your signature, when we are already on the topic of signatures.
Your location is using a "0" instead of an "O". Please fix your location so that it says "U.S.A." properly, or at the very least change the zero to an "O".
That wasn't politically polite at all.Cuddlebun wrote:
You are in Canada. Please correct this.
its not good for you
remove that christmas hat from your ava
christmas is over already ~
you are... your sig... uhh... your ava is... ??? asiajsif
I can't
I can't
You can't
Don't get sad! Get glad! 
You should get a new signature, since it shows a bit of your personality sometimes.
You should fix your signature so that everyone can understand it.
How's that? ^_^
How's that? ^_^
I'm not sure what the "need I say more?" part in your location is suggesting.
It's probably best to remove it.
It's probably best to remove it.
Are those logs really mandatory?
Don't they fit in a spoilerbox?
That little picture in your sig is apparently a link? Not very clear at all.
Nobody really looks at osu! bars anymore. If anyone is srtuck with an intense desire to see your rank they'll probably look at your userpage.
Don't they fit in a spoilerbox?
That little picture in your sig is apparently a link? Not very clear at all.
Nobody really looks at osu! bars anymore. If anyone is srtuck with an intense desire to see your rank they'll probably look at your userpage.
You certainly pointed out a bunch of things about Shellghost here when we're only supposed to provide one point. It's not always polite to overdo things.
learn to hit streams
Stop partying so hard.
So when did this thread move away from constructive critcism? I think it would be more interesting if you stuck to its original goal instead of being lazy.
Just because it sounds like they're not being constructive doesn't mean they're not trying. Perhaps they just a few more examples from this thread, but it's no excuse to just blatantly call them lazy.
There is no real reason to have that stupid :O in your in your signature. Remove it.
Your sig is sentence fragments rather than complete sentences. Consider the following:Zelos wrote:
Just because you got a low user rating or your map isnt well liked. It doesnt mean you did bad on your map. It just means there is always room for improvement!
Just because your map got a low user rating or isn't well liked doesn't mean you did poorly on your map. It just means that there's always room for improvement!
Don't use a quote box to help constructively criticize the person!
When constructively criticizing another person, you should try to use more positive words. Next time, instead of saying "Don't do this" perhaps give them an example of what they should do; for example:
"Try using quotation marks to quote another person rather than using the quote box!"
"Try using quotation marks to quote another person rather than using the quote box!"
May, if I may so inquire, your turtle have more of a sturdier briefcase on the top of it's shell, next time? It's muscles will go nowhere at this rate.
Please remove that santa hat from your avatar. Christmas is over already, as you can see. You can replace it with a cooler hat.
I really think that this is getting out of hand. I believe adam made the thread to criticize the person as a person and not as their avatar or signature. I'd really want to ask you to be more thorough with your critique, and give ideas on how that person can adapt, and amend his likkle irksome traits I'm pretty sure everyone has.
Rena-chan
mekadon_old
I suggest that you should read other replies too in this topic. As Wojjan said, we should criticize the person as a person.
Admitting defeat? Tha' is pathetic. Honestly, you should be referring to any subtle thing to criticize the person above but you don't have the capacity to do that. In fact, I'm beginning to doubt whether you are capable of thought.
That is outright rude. I would suggest that in the future you avoid such brash behaviour.LaVolpe024 wrote:
Admitting defeat? Tha' is pathetic. Honestly, you should be referring to any subtle thing to criticize the person above but you don't have the capacity to do that. In fact, I'm beginning to doubt whether you are capable of thought.
You don't need to quote someone when we're clearly expecting your post to be response to the post before it.
Expectations are useless when it comes to people, the quote was a good way to ensure we knew who was the last poster when he wrote his post.Kitsunemimi wrote:
You don't need to quote someone when we're clearly expecting your post to be response to the post before it.
Anyone may have posted before he pressed submit, and it would have looked silly. Please think about these things before replying, thank you.