Good, meh, or straight up bad? discuss.
I personally found it to be entertaining but the camera was just plain EVIL.
I personally found it to be entertaining but the camera was just plain EVIL.
forum
Epic Mickey
posted
Total Posts
12
Topic Starter
I saw this and I was like...
Hmm, Sonic Colours or Epic Mickey.
Choice was obvious.
Hmm, Sonic Colours or Epic Mickey.
Choice was obvious.
Now this game reminds me of the old-style mickey mouse
They are similar, aren't they...Lilac wrote:
Hmm, Sonic Colours or Epic Mickey.
I have both, they are pretty good.
Colors was meh, but no cheap gimmicks for once.
Epic Mickey is casual, but fun, and Nightmare Fuel if you think about it too much. Also, the concept art is kickass.
Colors was meh, but no cheap gimmicks for once.
Epic Mickey is casual, but fun, and Nightmare Fuel if you think about it too much. Also, the concept art is kickass.
Pretty much the only good thing about this game is the brilliant concept art from ages ago. I don't know why I expected it to be anything other than a dull outdated platformer back then, all things considered.
It was nice. Pretty different for a Disney game though.
Topic Starter
I personally found it to be more entertaining than sonic colors, not to say that sonic colors is bad, they are both "good" games.
I didn't much like some of the views and controls. When mickey lands, he slides a bit which can get frustrating. Guess I'm just used to something more like Kingdom Hearts.
There's a huge contradiction in the game titel:
Mickey can not be Epic.
(...though he was in Kingdom Hearts, but that's another story)
Mickey can not be Epic.
(...though he was in Kingdom Hearts, but that's another story)