[lord]
Why did you use small lette as diff name? did you intend?
00:37:241 - ~ 00:39:827 - Why didn't you make a change about slider velocity like 02:05:517 - ~ 02:08:103 - ?
01:08:620 (6,7) - How about this flow?
01:22:758 (1,2) - The distance between these is too far
01:29:310 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think DS 1.35 ~ 1.4 will be fine too. and imo it's better to make these circles more curved.
02:02:586 (2,1) - The distance made me feel awkward ;w;
02:17:155 - I recommend you to add circle here
02:21:724 (3,4) - How about this? (4) is same as 02:20:862 (1) - . also check it. 02:22:241 (2) - was stacked on 02:24:137 (1) -
02:27:068 (2) - Copy&paste 02:26:896 (1) - , and ctrl+H,J. 02:27:241 (3) - also do 02:27:413 (4) - check this~
02:32:413 (1,2,3,4) - Why did you use dwindling slider velocity?
02:37:241 (1) - I can't understand this slider.
02:47:931 (1,1) - Remove NC
02:50:344 - 02:52:413 - Hitsounds are not clear. It's better to turn up the volume imo
02:57:758 (2) - How about removing this? or How about filling 02:57:672 - 02:57:844 - with notes..? but, yes, I recommend you to remove it lol
03:05:000 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I think you stacked it too much. I don't recommend it in such a drumstep(drum&bass)
03:31:034 (1) - Why didn't you used x1.5 here?
03:36:551 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - lol consider using NC please.
03:39:482 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^
03:53:793 (1) - Stack
03:54:310 (2) - Make blanket tidy
04:38:793 (2) - I think it's too far. But um..
04:41:034 (7) - How about stacking it on 04:42:586 (7) - ?
Why did you use small lette as diff name? did you intend?
00:37:241 - ~ 00:39:827 - Why didn't you make a change about slider velocity like 02:05:517 - ~ 02:08:103 - ?
01:08:620 (6,7) - How about this flow?
01:22:758 (1,2) - The distance between these is too far
01:29:310 (1,2,3,4,5) - I think DS 1.35 ~ 1.4 will be fine too. and imo it's better to make these circles more curved.
02:02:586 (2,1) - The distance made me feel awkward ;w;
02:17:155 - I recommend you to add circle here
02:21:724 (3,4) - How about this? (4) is same as 02:20:862 (1) - . also check it. 02:22:241 (2) - was stacked on 02:24:137 (1) -
02:27:068 (2) - Copy&paste 02:26:896 (1) - , and ctrl+H,J. 02:27:241 (3) - also do 02:27:413 (4) - check this~
02:32:413 (1,2,3,4) - Why did you use dwindling slider velocity?
02:37:241 (1) - I can't understand this slider.
02:47:931 (1,1) - Remove NC
02:50:344 - 02:52:413 - Hitsounds are not clear. It's better to turn up the volume imo
02:57:758 (2) - How about removing this? or How about filling 02:57:672 - 02:57:844 - with notes..? but, yes, I recommend you to remove it lol
03:05:000 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - I think you stacked it too much. I don't recommend it in such a drumstep(drum&bass)
03:31:034 (1) - Why didn't you used x1.5 here?
03:36:551 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - lol consider using NC please.
03:39:482 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - ^
03:53:793 (1) - Stack
03:54:310 (2) - Make blanket tidy
04:38:793 (2) - I think it's too far. But um..
04:41:034 (7) - How about stacking it on 04:42:586 (7) - ?
Azer wrote:
this is pretty sick
I agree with these, pretty cool xDxDarxen wrote:
Please rank this beauty