This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2016 at 22:14:11

Artist: DragonForce
Title: Cry for Eternity
BPM: 140
Filesize: 17016kb
Play Time: 08:08
Difficulties Available:

1. 9.7 (6,7 stars, 3086 notes)
2. Anguish (6,7 stars, 3086 notes)
3. unscaled jump part (6,66 stars, 290 notes)

Download: DragonForce - Cry for Eternity
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Through the fire and the flames, breaking the chains
Into the night we go
Torment and pain trample the slain
Soldiers of death we know

pay attention to absolute spacing, stuff like 00:41:399 (1,2,3,6) - 00:41:699 (4,7) - 00:42:299 (7,1) - is way too close compared to 00:41:699 (4,5,6) -
00:47:099 (7) - this doesn't even blanket 00:46:649 (4) - but it's also too close to it, should place it somewhere in the center of 00:46:499 (3,4,5,6) - with a straight slider to make it look good
00:45:599 (3) - should really make sliderends like this clickable, it's really anti climatic now
00:48:599 (1) - no emphasis on that?
00:50:399 (3,4,5) - feels underspaced, compare it to this 00:51:449 (4,5,6) -
00:55:499 (5) - slider ends on strong note again
00:56:249 (1,2,1,2) - back and forth patterns like that don't look as good as back and forth patterns where notes overlap almost completely or don't overlap at all (right now it overlaps just a bit which is ugly)
00:57:599 (6,8) - ^ same here, it overlaps in a weird way that looks bad
00:58:349 (2,3,4) - this looks weird, if you make rhythms like these either have the circles follow the sliderpath to the end or disjoint the circles from the slider
01:01:349 (5) - this both flows bad and looks bad, placing it in this 01:00:599 (1) - position would be good for example
01:01:499 (6,7,8) - place these between 01:01:799 (1,2) - and get used to spacing things like that
01:08:999 (5) - nc and maybe even space this away from the stream if you want
01:11:399 (1) - just nc everything on the downbeat in this section, you won't get as lost then and it will actually make sense, right now things like 01:18:599 (5) - 01:16:199 (1) - have no emphasis
01:24:299 (8) - this is randomly far away visually, stands out a lot cause of absolute spacing
01:29:399 (1) - 01:29:699 (5) - these need some emphasis
01:31:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this pattern fits really well on these parts, should do this more
01:44:999 (9) - should do something like here 01:40:199 (1) -
01:47:699 (1) - just nc everything here every 2 notes
03:06:599 (13) - nc
03:48:599 (1) - spinner in the middle of a section like this doesn't really fit
03:52:199 (6) - the beginning of this slider is ugly, treat it like a stream, it's too straight there at one point where it should have a circular curve
04:11:999 (5) - ^
04:12:599 (1) - nc every 2 white ticks in this section, it's a clusterfuck right now
04:53:469 (1,2,3) - this is 1/6 4 notes
05:45:281 (8) - placing it there isn't a good idea, reverse arrows block circles, especially cancer on hidden
05:52:781 (6,7,8,9,10) - looks like you tried emphasizing the last note but it turned out weird
06:30:131 (1,2) - these 2 notes on those groups don't really fit, sounds much better without them
06:34:481 (5) - nc and space that
06:54:881 (2) - 06:56:081 (3) - nc
06:59:681 (2,3) - ^
07:01:181 (1) - this grouping is different again from the last time

Mazzerin wrote:

pay attention to absolute spacing, stuff like 00:41:399 (1,2,3,6) - 00:41:699 (4,7) - 00:42:299 (7,1) - is way too close compared to 00:41:699 (4,5,6) - yea
00:47:099 (7) - this doesn't even blanket 00:46:649 (4) - but it's also too close to it, should place it somewhere in the center of 00:46:499 (3,4,5,6) - with a straight slider to make it look good fulfilled absolute spacing somehow else
00:45:599 (3) - should really make sliderends like this clickable, it's really anti climatic now yea
00:48:599 (1) - no emphasis on that? added emphasis
00:50:399 (3,4,5) - feels underspaced, compare it to this 00:51:449 (4,5,6) - more spacing added
00:55:499 (5) - slider ends on strong note again yea
00:56:249 (1,2,1,2) - back and forth patterns like that don't look as good as back and forth patterns where notes overlap almost completely or don't overlap at all (right now it overlaps just a bit which is ugly) yea
00:57:599 (6,8) - ^ same here, it overlaps in a weird way that looks bad yea
00:58:349 (2,3,4) - this looks weird, if you make rhythms like these either have the circles follow the sliderpath to the end or disjoint the circles from the slider yea
01:01:349 (5) - this both flows bad and looks bad, placing it in this 01:00:599 (1) - position would be good for example did something else with the same purpose
01:01:499 (6,7,8) - place these between 01:01:799 (1,2) - and get used to spacing things like that got changed with the changes above
01:08:999 (5) - nc and maybe even space this away from the stream if you want yea
01:11:399 (1) - just nc everything on the downbeat in this section, you won't get as lost then and it will actually make sense, right now things like 01:18:599 (5) - 01:16:199 (1) - have no emphasis changed as much as i could without messing up the whole part
01:24:299 (8) - this is randomly far away visually, stands out a lot cause of absolute spacing i think (2) still fits in there
01:29:399 (1) - 01:29:699 (5) - these need some emphasis yea
01:31:349 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this pattern fits really well on these parts, should do this more 2lazy to remap, will keep in mind if i ever map DF again
01:44:999 (9) - should do something like here 01:40:199 (1) - yea
01:47:699 (1) - just nc everything here every 2 notes yea
03:06:599 (13) - nc yea
03:48:599 (1) - spinner in the middle of a section like this doesn't really fit the guitar is really weird and mapping it as a stream feels wrong
03:52:199 (6) - the beginning of this slider is ugly, treat it like a stream, it's too straight there at one point where it should have a circular curve tried my best but a slider with a shifting rotation will always have atleast one point without a curvature
04:11:999 (5) - ^ actually fixed that one
04:12:599 (1) - nc every 2 white ticks in this section, it's a clusterfuck right now yea
04:53:469 (1,2,3) - this is 1/6 4 notes nah the guitar is just really inconsistent, (1) is played 1/6 earlier, (2) and (3) are played as a delayed 1/6 double afterwards, there is no 4th note
05:45:281 (8) - placing it there isn't a good idea, reverse arrows block circles, especially cancer on hidden yea
05:52:781 (6,7,8,9,10) - looks like you tried emphasizing the last note but it turned out weird yea
06:30:131 (1,2) - these 2 notes on those groups don't really fit, sounds much better without them idk otherwise theres this huge pause with the bass drums still in them
06:34:481 (5) - nc and space that yea
06:54:881 (2) - 06:56:081 (3) - nc yea
06:59:681 (2,3) - ^ yea
07:01:181 (1) - this grouping is different again from the last time yea

yea=accepted