tbh, I also came with that sc source, but w\e it wont take much time to lowercase, hope you guys can make some kind of agreement :3
Frankly speaking, it does matter. If we let this slip through, I really do not know what people start to put in their title and artist from now on and from the viewpoint of the QAT, how to judge what is minor and what is not, leading the limit being pushed far and even further away. Eventually, everything returns to the metadata standard several years ago.MkGuh wrote:
Does that even matter? I mean, it is just a capitalization question, no one sees/care about that and also doesn't change nothing while searching the map. Honestly, this one being right/wrong I don't see a reason to disqualify just because of that. The important things about the title is there, this is what should matter.
If you mean the artist, sure. There are still 4-5 days the map being ranked.Aleks719 wrote:
i've send a tweet to them, let's see what they reply.
IamKwaN wrote:
Sorry, I guess I have to disqualify this until a response from the mapper or confirmation from the artist is heard.
Please let me know if you want to change the title or wait for artist's confirmation, sorry for any convenience.
the name does seem likeHe only made a guess, it doesn't prove anything. Just a guess: you can agree with it, you can not agree with it. If file's name would be "Various artists - Track 1", does it mean it's a metadata? c'mon.
the name does seem likeThe name IS 2015 in 10 Minutes, download yourself to check.
He only made a guess, it doesn't prove anything. Just a guess: you can agree with it, you can not agree with it.I have proved it.
If file's name would be "Various artists - Track 1", does it mean it's a metadata? c'mon.Yes, if there is nowhere we could find the metadata. Look at this: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/429454 .
Uploaded file's name is not a source.Link them.
I remember many topics where QAT don't count file's name as a source since it's not "printed" or "mentioned" anywhere.
I don't care Stefan, problem is another: Kwan disqualified map without a proof.I refuse to repeat.
as i told, i don't accept name of uploaded file as an official source. that's all you have and it's very very weak line of your attack on capitalized letter.IamKwaN wrote:
the name does seem likeThe name IS 2015 in 10 Minutes, download yourself to check.
uploaded file is not a source. that's it.He only made a guess, it doesn't prove anything. Just a guess: you can agree with it, you can not agree with it.I have proved it.
nope.If file's name would be "Various artists - Track 1", does it mean it's a metadata? c'mon.Yes, if there is nowhere we could find the metadata. Look at this: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/429454 .
as you said before we don't compare map, each case is different.Uploaded file's name is not a source.Link them.
I remember many topics where QAT don't count file's name as a source since it's not "printed" or "mentioned" anywhere.
dig old maps with date of approval 2-3 years ago, if you have nothing else to doI don't care Stefan, problem is another: Kwan disqualified map without a proof.I refuse to repeat.
File sharing service with slogan "Build, engage, and monetize your online audience"? Man, are you joking?IamKwaN wrote:
Change it to 2015 in 10 minutes then.
https://www.hive.co/downloads/download/ ... spotlight/
okay, let's start from you.Loctav wrote:
What's your source of metadata then, Aleks?
Also their facebook page is a valid source. Stick to that. Or don't get it ranked.
Have you ever thought of the consequences behind if we adopt this?Yeah, perfectly. It's valid only for tracks without proved source. With FB page i can only say the name is "2015 (?)n 10 Minutes". and it's better than you give. In addition, osu is not sensitive to capitalizing. Searching engine doesn't work with2-letter words.
You can't trust older maps, simply because metadata wasn't checked as much than now, same maps who share same song/artist.Vass_Bass wrote:
Exuse me, why there's another map 2015 in 10 Minutes with big "M" in it and there's no unrank? no offical name, no metadata and only one persoon just decided to unrank it? it does'n even matter in searching
it's really wrong. even you unrank it, you really need to fix another version of map
(also 2013 and 2014 has different names with I and i in it) so where's the truth?
2015 in 10 Minutes is correct, would you mind reading what we have gone so far before commenting?Vass_Bass wrote:
Exuse me, why there's another map 2015 in 10 Minutes with big "M" in it and there's no unrank? no offical name, no metadata and only one persoon just decided to unrank it? it does'n even matter in searching
it's really wrong. even you unrank it, you really need to fix another version of map
(also 2013 and 2014 has different names with M and m in it) so where's the truth?
I hope everyone has similar thinking like yours.Lizzy wrote:
also, if the D&T's facebook page is verified, just take the name from that source, what is the big fucking problem here omg
Read what I reply to Vass_Bass.Lizzy wrote:
besides, it should be noted, there are an array of ranked 20xx in 10 minutes maps on this forum, and they have all been mapped by aleks. I would have a hard time believing that D&T would deviate from their previous compilations' titles like that. If anything, those maps should have been unranked too. nobody pointed all this out to be an issue in the past, so why make a big deal like this now?
I mean tracks on their channel, not mapsNozhomi wrote:
You can't trust older maps, simply because metadata wasn't checked as much than now, same maps who share same song/artist.Vass_Bass wrote:
Exuse me, why there's another map 2015 in 10 Minutes with big "M" in it and there's no unrank? no offical name, no metadata and only one persoon just decided to unrank it? it does'n even matter in searching
it's really wrong. even you unrank it, you really need to fix another version of map
(also 2013 and 2014 has different names with I and i in it) so where's the truth?
Metadata in osu! doesn't work that way. You need to use the official metadata provided by the artist.theReaL_Gatorix wrote:
Is all of this bickering really hinging upon a simple capitalization issue? Really easy English grammar... every word in a title is capitalized except if it's a preposition or an article.. 2015 in 15 Minutes should suffice.
Maybe a simple [google:1337]Google[/google:1337] search will tell you literally every result contains the same capitalization pattern? I mean, really? Where is the error/illegitimacy in that? Seriously?