1. osu! forums
  2. osu!
  3. Feature Requests
This is a feature request. Feature requests can be voted up by supporters.
Current Priority: +0
show more
posted

Derekku wrote:

Make that "a correct multiple timing section mod" and I'll agree with you.
ah, yeah sure :o

Feno wrote:

Kudosu does need to be regulated, have like one or two BAT's be like "Kudosu Guards" and if someone sees abused kudosu, tell them and it'll be corrected.
There's no need for a specific person or team for managing kudosu. Now that MAT can gives bubble, BAT are more free?, so maybe they could go around an look for any abused kudosu or just give MAT a privilege to denied kudosu seeing MAT's are more active throughout the pending beatmap forum (don't know if they'll bother read the whole page to find any :P )
posted

Derekku wrote:

modder 1: bpm 120 and offset 760 plz
mapper: oh okay! =D ty! *gives kd*
modder 2: ofset 780 is better
mapper: oh... okay! *gives kd*
modder 3: no no 760 was fine :|
mapper: oh... *gives kd*
.
.
.
modder n: YOU'RE ALL WRONG, THE BPM SHOULD BE 119.98 AND OFFSET 770
modder: >x< *gives the 20th kd*

MAT/BAT/SOMEONE THAT ACTUALLY CAN TIME PROPERLY: bpm 120, offset 740 *bubble* *rank*
I would like to see this scenario and shout at everyone involved; is this a real case?
posted

Zekira wrote:

I would like to see this scenario and shout at everyone involved; is this a real case?
I exaggerated a little bit, but very similar cases happen all the time where multiple people bounce an offset back and forth while the mapper hands out kd to all of them.
posted

Derekku wrote:

Zekira wrote:

I would like to see this scenario and shout at everyone involved; is this a real case?
I exaggerated a little bit, but very similar cases happen all the time where multiple people bounce an offset back and forth while the mapper hands out kd to all of them.
This could be resolved by allowing mappers to deny previously given kudosu.
posted

0_o wrote:

This could be resolved by allowing mappers to deny previously given kudosu.
"Deny kudosu? o-o B-but they also gave me nice combo modding! ^-^"
posted
Well shit it's up to the mapper to discern stuff like that
...oh wait a minute, they probably won't be able to...
posted

tieff wrote:

long mod post!=good post.
posted
It sounds like a good idea to me.
1 is more or less the standard, while 2kd could be given to extraordinarily helpful posts.
posted
(example) modder :
Easy]
00:31:596 (1) remove new combo
[normal]
no prob
[Hard]
no prob too
[Insane]
this diff is too hard
orz ,don't stared , dis map sucks
noob mapper:
omg ty ty ty ilu <3 <3 i will give u 3 kudos <3 <3 <3
^this.
no suport
posted

Hyguys wrote:

(example) modder :
Easy]
00:31:596 (1) remove new combo
[normal]
no prob
[Hard]
no prob too
[Insane]
this diff is too hard
orz ,don't stared , dis map sucks
noob mapper:
omg ty ty ty ilu <3 <3 i will give u 3 kudos <3 <3 <3
Then someone will notice, tell a BAT, and their kudosu will be reduced/removed. Simple?
posted

Derekku wrote:

modder n: YOU'RE ALL WRONG, THE BPM SHOULD BE 119.98 AND OFFSET 770
BPM best be trollin.

Anyways, with a ranking system, very few mappers would actually follow it. It'd be more like "omg thanks for modin so much kduzou." and they'd give the maximum amount. Also then there's those stubborn people who go "wtf y I no get 2 kudozu."

;D.
Please sign in to reply.