Liking speedcore doesn't make you a weeb, lol. Its just a type of music. I mean, it is weird, but its kinda cool as well.Blue Dragon wrote:
this is why I don't post here anymore
this place is filled with 13yo weeaboos
forum
T+Pazolite sucks
posted
Total Posts
57
DeletedUser_3905941
Speedcore is good but some of them is like "hey look! i made a 743 bpm speedcore!", that is just too fast.Droplet wrote:
Liking speedcore doesn't make you a weeb, lol. Its just a type of music. I mean, it is weird, but its kinda cool as well.Blue Dragon wrote:
this is why I don't post here anymore
this place is filled with 13yo weeaboos
Or some of them just simply lack melody touch.
Oh.
The more you knowDroplet wrote:
Speedcore without melody is called splittercore.
Won't that be called terrorcore?Droplet wrote:
Speedcore without melody is called splittercore.
If its more than 1000bpm, it would be terracore.BigEarsMau wrote:
Won't that be called terrorcore?Droplet wrote:
Speedcore without melody is called splittercore.
And anything after 5000bpm is exacore
But still curious wouldn't that such a BPM considered as... Too fast for human ears?
As awful as the opening post is, it's a barely passable thread. I'd probably lock it if I don't see any improvement in the following posts.
I suppose all that I have to say is that everyone has their own taste and music will mean different things to different people. While there is more to be appreciated in some genres and pieces than others, this really just boils down to what you like and don't like. And that itself doesn't need much of a reason. I think t+pazolite is pretty fitting for a rhythm game like this. Maybe it's not something I'd listen to casually, but it would probably be better suited for osu! than a smooth classic song.
It just has its own merits.
I suppose all that I have to say is that everyone has their own taste and music will mean different things to different people. While there is more to be appreciated in some genres and pieces than others, this really just boils down to what you like and don't like. And that itself doesn't need much of a reason. I think t+pazolite is pretty fitting for a rhythm game like this. Maybe it's not something I'd listen to casually, but it would probably be better suited for osu! than a smooth classic song.
It just has its own merits.
Well, you stop being able to discern what is a beat and what is a chord or note or whatever it's called gradually. It's not necessarily like there's a line you cross or a certain bpm where you just stop realizing that you're just hearing a rapidly repeated sound.Rilene wrote:
But still curious wouldn't that such a BPM considered as... Too fast for human ears?
I'm just not sure about that at the first place.Brian OA wrote:
Well, you stop being able to discern what is a beat and what is a chord or note or whatever it's called gradually. It's not necessarily like there's a line you cross or a certain bpm where you just stop realizing that you're just hearing a rapidly repeated sound.Rilene wrote:
But still curious wouldn't that such a BPM considered as... Too fast for human ears?
t+pazolite is good for beatmaps
horrible music tho, unless you consider ear rape music
horrible music tho, unless you consider ear rape music
I actually find this pretty decent, but most are meh
Yeah that one is cool.
Its so disappointing when people claim that quality in music is not subjective, but then fail to provide the system they use to measure and quantify quality in music.
Or if that is too much to ask, at least provide sound reasoning as for why it shouldn't be completely subjective.
Everything else is just redundant and boring.
"It is not music it rhythm and beats layered over each other"... ok? Why should I accept the premise that this is a bad thing? I know its beats layered over each other, thats just stating the obvious. It's like someone saying: Look, the sky is blue. Why not make this interesting and say: The sky is blue and that is a bad thing because [...], therefore [...] ?
Or if that is too much to ask, at least provide sound reasoning as for why it shouldn't be completely subjective.
Everything else is just redundant and boring.
"It is not music it rhythm and beats layered over each other"... ok? Why should I accept the premise that this is a bad thing? I know its beats layered over each other, thats just stating the obvious. It's like someone saying: Look, the sky is blue. Why not make this interesting and say: The sky is blue and that is a bad thing because [...], therefore [...] ?
I think your issue stems from expecting too much from OP. The statement itself is more in line with trying to stir shit up rather than start a discussion.
really anyone in this thread had the chance to make it interesting.
I liked what you said in your post for example. Quality follows function. If you use a song for a rhythm-game, then the quality of the piece must be determined using different criteria compared to a song that parents use to make their children fall asleep.
So instead of calling a song bad or good across the board, we can just look how well it does in specific cases, which could have the potential to resolve this whole issue. In any way it seems like a useful way to think about it. Make categories and rate songs within them, while a rating in one category has absolutely no bearing on ratings in other categories.
I assign t+pazolite 10/10 points in the general rhythm game department, and 0/10 points in the general kids goodnight-songs department.
I liked what you said in your post for example. Quality follows function. If you use a song for a rhythm-game, then the quality of the piece must be determined using different criteria compared to a song that parents use to make their children fall asleep.
So instead of calling a song bad or good across the board, we can just look how well it does in specific cases, which could have the potential to resolve this whole issue. In any way it seems like a useful way to think about it. Make categories and rate songs within them, while a rating in one category has absolutely no bearing on ratings in other categories.
I assign t+pazolite 10/10 points in the general rhythm game department, and 0/10 points in the general kids goodnight-songs department.
Some people actually did, though. Just in a different, probably more enjoyable, and non-intellectual way.Railey2 wrote:
really anyone in this thread had the chance to make it interesting.
tyvmBrian OA wrote:
Some people actually did, though. Just in a different, probably more enjoyable, and non-intellectual way.Railey2 wrote:
really anyone in this thread had the chance to make it interesting.
nno u
honestly what the fuck kind of topic is this fuck off all of you