1. Normal appears to be missing preview point?
2. Not sure about the normal-hitnormal, soft-hitnormal2, soft-slidertick2... The start of the sound seems really quiet and gives the feeling of delay. You can cut the start by at least 10ms without affecting how it sounds.

1. 00:05:920 (3) - Would be nice to curve it a little more imo: http://puu.sh/m7oxI/75abc3550b.jpg
2. 00:44:358 (4,5,1) - This flow feels awkward to me. Maybe you can try something like this: http://puu.sh/m7oHt/b1bb4cb061.jpg
3. 02:01:467 (2,3,4,5) - Esoteric rhythm. Nobody playing a Normal diff will understand this. I recommend choosing a rhythm that goes with vocals instead.
4. 03:06:154 (2) - I think the slider feels better to play in this orientation: http://puu.sh/m7oY8/53b69e11da.jpg
5. Anything I said also applies to copy-pasted parts where relevant.

1. 01:42:483 (3,4,1) - Proportion of jumps seems weird here, because (3,4) is larger than (4,1). Puts a strange accent on (4) where there shouldn't be. Emphasis should be on (1), hence (4,1) should be larger to feel more natural. Alternatively, you can try changing the direction of (1) to make it feel stronger.

1. 00:40:139 (2) - This just doesn't flow well. It plays a lot nicer when reversed.
2. 03:08:029 (5) - This circle really kills it. The emphasis on (4) in the song could be highlighted really well if you deleted (5). http://puu.sh/m7pEX/5b1f7a93ac.jpg
3. 04:18:107 (1) - What is this supposed to be? Mistletoe?

Little wrote:

[General]

1. Normal appears to be missing preview point?
2. Not sure about the normal-hitnormal, soft-hitnormal2, soft-slidertick2... The start of the sound seems really quiet and gives the feeling of delay. You can cut the start by at least 10ms without affecting how it sounds. damn cutting does sound better as a hitsound lol

[Normal]

1. 00:05:920 (3) - Would be nice to curve it a little more imo: http://puu.sh/m7oxI/75abc3550b.jpg
2. 00:44:358 (4,5,1) - This flow feels awkward to me. Maybe you can try something like this: http://puu.sh/m7oHt/b1bb4cb061.jpg
3. 02:01:467 (2,3,4,5) - Esoteric rhythm. Nobody playing a Normal diff will understand this. I recommend choosing a rhythm that goes with vocals instead.
4. 03:06:154 (2) - I think the slider feels better to play in this orientation: http://puu.sh/m7oY8/53b69e11da.jpg
5. Anything I said also applies to copy-pasted parts where relevant.

[Hard]

1. 01:42:483 (3,4,1) - Proportion of jumps seems weird here, because (3,4) is larger than (4,1). Puts a strange accent on (4) where there shouldn't be. Emphasis should be on (1), hence (4,1) should be larger to feel more natural. Alternatively, you can try changing the direction of (1) to make it feel stronger.

[Noel]

1. 00:40:139 (2) - This just doesn't flow well. It plays a lot nicer when reversed. i like the effect of antiflow here imo fits the song well
2. 03:08:029 (5) - This circle really kills it. The emphasis on (4) in the song could be highlighted really well if you deleted (5). http://puu.sh/m7pEX/5b1f7a93ac.jpg
3. 04:18:107 (1) - What is this supposed to be? Mistletoe?

gl

Xexxar wrote:

Ok Sanic Modding Activated:

Noel

hi qt

ok

00:00:530 (1,2,3,4) - why not do a similar thing but create a bit of symmetry in the pattern (EX: http://puu.sh/m6V3u/1d8fbcbf4e.jpg would look a bit better no?

00:03:342 (3) - move 3 over so its equal distance from 4 and 5 for a more visual consistent pattern?

00:04:748 (3,4,5) - creating a triangle between 4 and 3 and 5's slider start would look better for visual coherence current looks better to me :3

00:28:420 (1,2,3) - same, move 3 up to be closer to 1's start ^

00:47:873 (2,3,4) - I feel like this would look better with a little bit of curve to it it is :3 just very little lol

01:31:936 (4) - i feel like would be more impactful as a single note to mark the start of break ahhjust doesnt feel right ><

01:49:983 (2) - slider shape seems a tad bit random but you do you dunno o_O

01:58:420 (1,2,3,4) - square is uneven if you'd like to fix welp i tried lol

02:54:436 (4) - make this into 2 notes. Its more satisfying to click the last sound before break (same as before basically) wana keep consistency and i prefer releasing a break with something easy

03:04:982 (8,1) - emphasis seems confused, jump to 8 is greater than jump to 1, but 1 is more emphatic.

04:03:810 (2,3) - i feel like these are a bit too curved think its ok o-o

04:18:108 (1) - SANTA IS COMING a+ slider

Hard

01:41:780 (1,2,3,4,1) - i feel like this could be evenly spaced because theres no real emphasis reason for the beats to be not even, would look better

01:56:311 (4) - it seems like you avoid alot of curved sliders in your maps but i think this would definitely be a good spot for one. I havent been pointing alot out because i felt it was your style, but one thing I like to do is bridge two straight sliders with a curved, maybe you'd like that hmm just doesn't seem right to me o-o

02:18:811 (4) - moving this more to the right would make 1 more impactful which i think is more appropriate same with 02:19:748 (2,2) -
i think the 1 is the stronger beat not sure how to explain it but it just feels more right to me as it is >< playing wise anyway

02:54:436 (4) - click emphasis !!!

im too bad at normals to comment on normals

Kamio Misuzu wrote:

Hi~ m4m from your queue:3
[General]
cancel the countdown

[Noel]

1. 00:07:678 (6) - delete the whistle? for instruments o-o
2. 01:00:529 (1) - add a whistle? try thishttp://puu.sh/m627X/cd76608636.wav
3. 01:15:530 (1) - ^
4. 02:23:029 (1) - ^
5. 02:38:030 (1) - ^
6. 03:30:998 (1) - ^
7. 01:09:670 (1) - try this
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:23:264 (2) - delete this one? this is for flow connection
9. 01:29:358 (1,2) - ^
10. 02:54:436 (4) - change the tail's drum-finish into drum-whistle? nah drum finish sounds better
11. 03:30:060 (3,4) - slider? prefer circles here
12. 03:44:592 (1) - delete for flow connection

[Hard]
nothing to say....

[Normal]

1. 02:31:233 (2) - 1/2slider+note? like this one 01:08:733 (2,3) -

Orz can't find anything to say..very nice map

And，merry christmas!

• [General]

1. tag add kibbxxxxx ?
   
   [Normal]
   
2. 01:39:436 (3) - DS , why it's normal addition lol
   
3. 03:23:263 - add a 1/2 slider same as Hard diff 2 note ?
   
   [Noel]
   
4. 00:59:592 (2,3,4) - 01:00:295 (2,3,1) - 02:22:092 (2,3,4) - 02:22:795 (6,7,1) - PP here …… stack easy to FC ???
   
5. 03:06:154 (3) - i prefer use 2 note
   
   can't write more 【
   
   
   

Lily Bread wrote:

M4M from your queue.

[Metadata]
artist : ちょうちょ iirc choucho prefers 'choucho' rather than the japanese one


[Normal]
01:16:936 (3,4) - stack.
03:47:873 (3,4) - stack.
01:39:436 (3) - DS issue?
optional: a slider from - 00:50:920 - to - 00:51:389 - ? because the vocal is continued here. yeah i see what you mean but i don't want the chain of 1/2 rhythms to get too long so i use this to give them a break.
01:03:108 - ^.

01:40:608 - ^. and this is highly recommended, because - 01:40:842 - here has a drum beat. use slider to "overlap" it seems much better.

[Hard]
02:04:983 (2,3) - the flow here seems not so good. but i don't know how to change.

[Noel]
00:27:483 (2) - it's not necessary to jump here. the music is so quiet. it fits guitar imo
optional: add a spinner at - 01:31:467 -? now you mapped - 01:31:467 (3,4) - , but after - 01:32:405 - is empty, sounds a bit weird. still debating how to do this part tbh LOL
04:16:349 - a drum beat here?

pretty good mapset. good luck!

Narcissu wrote:

• [General]

1. tag add kibbxxxxx ?
   
   [Normal]
   
2. 01:39:436 (3) - DS , why it's normal addition lol
   
3. 03:23:263 - add a 1/2 slider same as Hard diff 2 note ?
   
   [Noel]
   
4. 00:59:592 (2,3,4) - 01:00:295 (2,3,1) - 02:22:092 (2,3,4) - 02:22:795 (6,7,1) - PP here …… stack easy to FC ??? i will consider, i like this structure better than stacking
   
5. 03:06:154 (3) - i prefer use 2 note
   
   can't write more 【
   
   

UndeadCapulet wrote:

Looks like I'm first here this year~

General

maybe try to find bigger bg now that we have fancy new size limit (yours is pretty small even for old limit)

---

Noel

1. 00:16:936 (3,1) - Maybe 1/1 slider would be nice here to match 00:15:061 (1) - , but up to you. Same for 00:20:686 (3,1) - , and then maybe 00:19:045 (4,1) - 1/2 as well. circles are better for drums here
2. 01:00:530 (1,2,3) - Should probably have this triangle play clockwise instead of counterclockwise, so it doesn't blend into the previous 00:58:889 (2,3,1,2,3,4,1) - pattern. Really emphasize the kiai.
3. 01:15:295 (3) - Think this would be much nicer making a smooth line, I don't think the diagonal motions fit here since it makes this more like a jump pattern. Same for 03:45:998 (3,4,1) - and I suppose 02:37:561 (2,3,1) - as well. (you'll probably reject this knowing you) fixed slightly, i dont want the spacing to be too small between the sliders.
4. 01:20:686 (6,1) - Maybe change to this rhythm to fit the vocals better. Same for 02:42:951 (6,1) - and 03:51:623 (7,1) - . i dont see how :S the antijump kinda works but i still think a slider is nicer
5. 01:29:826 (1) - Maybe delete this note since there's no drum beat, the double would be more fun to play imo ;-;
6. 01:30:530 (1,2,3,4) - hmm idk the break seems really randomly placed, I guess you're trying to map until the vocals stop, but since the instrumentals keep going and she holds a long vocal it doesn't really work, instead just stopping playing midway. Maybe delete these beats and just put one circle on the downbeat, or map the whole break out. Same for 02:53:030 (1,2,3,4) - , and all lower difficulties.
7. 02:30:061 (4,5) - Back at 01:07:561 (4) - you used a 1/2 slider, and I really think that fits the high pitched vocal better than basic jump placements.
8. 02:35:920 (6,1) - Swap NC to fit with your vocal NC patterning.
9. 03:38:498 (4) - Would move this to somewhere else so there's a stronger angle coming into the sliderhead, something like this maybe? But worked to fit w/ your visual style ofc
10. 04:00:998 (4,5,6) - Make these beats consistent with 01:29:826 (1,2,3,4) - in some way. Preferably just both being quads is best for me, but up to you what to do.

Pretty pleasant, tho I still think you overly rely on basic jump patterns to fill time, here a lot of your rhythming fits really well :3

---

Hard

1. 00:07:092 (3) - Converting to two circles would show off the next slider's sound better. i dont see much of an issue with this tbh, the slider just looks better imo
2. 00:10:842 (3,4) - Use 1/2 circle instead to match with your previous rhythming, it's more fun that way imo, you don't need to constantly change rhythms to keep people from being bored.
3. 01:14:592 (1,1) - I realize it would take a lot of restructuring, but I think stacking these would fit the song really really well, esp how you toggle kiai here too, a stop-and-start motion would be really nice. Same for 02:37:092 (1,1) - . the music isnt like completely silent so i went with spaced.

Ah, nice diff, I like how you use jumps in this, really good job teaching the mechanic.

oh and btw quads aren't too hard for a Hard

---

Normal

1. 00:08:030 (1,2) - Careful with arranges like this since new players mix up repeat arrows and numbers really easily, they could break here in a frustrating way. tbh i dont really see the problem with this stuff owo

Well, biggest thing is the breaks like I mentioned earlier.

---

Pentori wrote:

chirstmus que
[Noel]
hitsound suggestions apply to all diffs
00:07:561 (5,6,7,8) - sounds like a 1/6 trill from 00:07:795 - if u want to use that kind of snapping, if not u should simplify with a 1/4 reverse slider not a stream cus its more suited to those sounds did latter
00:22:561 - sound is more of a hit-hat sound rather than bell so maybe use different hitsounds. soft whistle + clap works i guess
00:58:889 (2,3) - ran out of room? lol. i reckon u should find somewhere to put this that continues ur patterning tried :<
00:59:592 (2,3,4) - idk about different triplet usage, just feels awkward to play when the only audible sound is on 00:59:592 (2) if u listen closely there is definitely sound in the music there, same applies to the latter one
01:04:748 (3,5) - free blanket
01:14:592 (1,2) - eh i reckon this looks/plays nicer if u swap nc musically i believe this fits better, also works nicer with the kiai fountain
01:28:889 - finish? might be a bit overpowering but works with music
01:29:944 (1) - ghost note? i cant hear anything
01:58:420 (1) - normal sampleset is strange here cos there r no bells, maybe u were going for normal addition?
01:58:420 (1,2,3,4) - looks uneven i did my best Dx
02:22:092 (2,3,4) - same as said earlier abt white tick triplet ^
02:37:092 (1,2) - could swap ncs here ^
02:51:389 - finish?
03:54:670 - 03:55:607 - 03:56:545 - ^
04:00:881 (1) - cant hear anything here
04:18:108 (1) - those ticks seem a little overpowering since they aren't actually in the music. maybe do like 20 / 15 / 10 / 5% vol starting from 04:18:576 - so the ticks dont stand out as obviously

other diffs r good

Pentori wrote:

#1
was gonna say get a bigger bg but u can do that b4 qualify if u want

[ Jewel Riko ] wrote:

[Noel]

01:21:858 (3) - I think this slider's bending is not very smoothly. I would suggest edit to like arc i don't really see whats too bad about my sliders, i kinda like em :S
02:32:170 (1) - ditto
02:40:373 (2,3,4) - The objects place a little weird... If I were you, I would do like this what's weird about it, i think it plays and flows fine o-o



Maybe I don't do very well... I think the space shorter, it would look prettier.

03:24:670 (2,3) - the space between the objects is too close its to group 2 and 3 as a pattern
03:41:545 (3) - 03:57:482 (1) - a little strange... ehh? why

I really like this song. XD
Since I'm too busy in examination, I just try to mod 1 difficulty....XDD
Good luck~~

Garden wrote:

General:
reminder for a bigger bg

Normal:
00:08:030 (1) - why inconsistent rhythm pattern compared with others?
01:30:061 (6) - what about turning this into a 1/2 slider, it follows 01:30:295 - drumsound and it's easier to approach than a circle since rhythm here is inconsistent, unlike the second kiai

Hard:
01:53:733 (2,3,1) - the uneven spacing here doesnt feel natural to me .. they sound same as 01:42:483 (3,4,1) -
02:59:826 (1,2,3) - a 1/4 reversed slider can be a nicer introduction to the next part after a break, triplets cause easy 100s but its up to u

Noel:
03:30:998 - wheres normal addition, same in other difs
04:17:170 (3,4) - i would suggest ctrl-g them, the anticlockwise movement with suddenly bumped-up spacing plays uhhh, ctrl-g would also make 04:17:639 (1,2) - equally emphasized

Pentori wrote:

thx