Azer wrote:

open to any mods!

VINXIS wrote:

genedarl

1. 03:57:395 (1,2,3) - wow id space these aLO t farther cuz tht jsut looksat max 1/2 spacing lo after that super slow slider i don't think there's the need to tbh (
2. 04:01:848 (1,2,1) - that angle to the slider is rlyl weir d . . .. . sam
3. 04:17:551 (3) - missing htisound thing lo lo
4. 04:47:434 (2,3,1,2,3) - somethign about this rhythm feels RLLY OFF 2 play tbh but idk wot... . . . que?

Remilia_CO wrote:

Really good map XD hard to find something to say.

SelentiaV2

1. 00:52:942 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I feel making jumps on the heavy sounds
   
   might be better
2. 01:00:208 - 01:15:208 - make the DS larger?
3. 02:00:676 (3) - 02:04:426 (2) - 02:23:176 (3) - 02:53:176 (3) - NC for SV changing?
4. 03:57:395 (1,2,3) - DS of these three notes feels awkward. I would replace them with three
   
   sliders and with different SV for each slider.
5. 05:06:770 - 05:07:708 - this part I think it needs a higher SV. and the following similar
   
   parts same.

Good luck XD

Remilia_CO wrote:

Really good map XD hard to find something to say.

SelentiaV2

1. 00:52:942 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I feel making jumps on the heavy sounds might be betterprefer it this way, follows the sidechaining
2. 01:00:208 - 01:15:208 - make the DS larger? needs to be small for buildup
3. 02:00:676 (3) - 02:04:426 (2) - 02:23:176 (3) - 02:53:176 (3) - NC for SV changing? did some of them

Good luck XD

Remilia_CO wrote:

[

SelentiaV2

1. 03:57:395 (1,2,3) - DS of these three notes feels awkward. I would replace them with three sliders and with different SV for each slider. Didn't replace with sliders but made DS higher
2. 05:06:770 - 05:07:708 - this part I think it needs a higher SV. and the following similar parts same. I think it's actually high enough there

sukiNathan wrote:

drum-hitclap has a few ms of delay you can cut off more or less intended
also you have a couple of unused images, unless you plan to make a storyboard may or may not in the future, i messed around a while back but wasnt satisfied, prob not gonna happen so i deleted the images

Azer
02:59:680 (1) - I think it would be much nicer to have something clickable instead of a super short spinner here, I mean it's a 1/8 tick away from the aimod warning which I'm assuming is why you extended it lol changed
02:46:497 (2,3,4) - the movement between 3 and 4 feels like an awkward deceleration to me with the wide angle and huge movement after 2→3; I think giving 02:46:614 (3,4) - more direction change would feel a lot better hard to change, plays fine imo
02:23:176 (3) - looking at the visual context that you've set up with previous sliders, I think doing something more edgy than a clean loop would be more fitting for such a wubby sound i think a loop is edgy enough
02:26:575 (2,1,1,1,1,1,2,3) - seems backwards how this entire pattern transitions into more simple shapes at 02:28:333 (1,2), which is closer to the peak of the build up compared to 02:26:575 (2,1,1,1) - which has more safdljkadklj shapes drums disappear during last 3 and bass holds the note, i feel its more appropriate this way
02:29:036 (3) - I think you could shorten this by a tick and add a circle; it would feel much more impactful and accent 02:29:739 (1) better the forced jump has more impact
02:53:176 (3) - same thing mentioned before a
00:04:192 (1,2,3,4) - you could place a NC on 3 with the way you've set up the pattern to emphasize it; it would also differentiate from the previous groupings of 4 sliders (applies to other patterns too)
actually wait you've already done it once, but only for 00:26:692 (1,2,1,2) lol, you should make it consistent added a ton of ncs
02:38:879 (3) - could NC this too to be consistent with all other similar patterns okkkk
02:05:833 (1,2) - these curves feel out of place imo; reducing them might be more suitable done

as oko said I think the V2 is unnecessary, remove it or come up with another name w/e OK FINE I HOPE YOU LIKE THIS ONE
get a few more mods and I'll recheck later

sukiNathan wrote:

kevin
03:35:598 (3) - any reason to not have a NC here? added
04:29:036 (1) - same thing mentioned for azer at 02:29:036 (3) idk a hittable note there doesen't really fit with the synth losing power
04:59:036 (1,1) - 2 pretty different sounds but the exact same shape, why not spice up the second one edgy sliders here we go

Broccoly wrote:

03:15:208 (1,2,3,4) - i thought these were 1/2 sliders placed 1/2 beats apart at first due to their spacing. Placing them just a bit closer would be better imo. good point here, fixed
04:16:614 (1,2,1,2,1) - i didn't quite like the linear flow here. I would change the flow of the latter 1,2 circles into something else to better express the music there.. something like this maybe ehh i think current flow actually works pretty good there, i don't really see the need to change it
04:34:583 (2) - ctrl g looks fun ye it does

zeborg wrote:

01:53:645 (1,2) - stack feels odd .-. huh? its the same as all the others
02:45:208 (1,1,2) - irregluar spacing (imo) seems fine


(double stack notes make me cry)

1. drum-hitclap has delay, Please use this (remove delay
   http://puu.sh/qnmEj/ac007d7b1a.zip

1. OD +1?
2. 00:07:708 (8) - You didn't take the sound on here 00:09:700 - . also seems overmapping 00:07:825 - . try to use one circle instead of 1/4 slider to 00:07:708 -
3. 00:29:973 (2) - How abour this pattern ? new sound from here 00:30:208 -
   
4. 00:47:083 (5) - add a new combo same your previous pattern
5. 01:20:364 (5,6) - prefer to use ctrl + g flow :p
6. 01:23:762 (4) - I feel this jump is a little hard for reading, try this?
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 02:48:489 (3) - forgot to add a new combo like 02:18:489 (1) -
8. 04:15:442 (2) - ^ 02:15:442 (1) -
9. 04:37:473 (2) - it's should be 1/6 sounds like 02:15:442 (1,2,3) - .
   
10. 04:38:411 (2,3) - I have a sense of discomfort with this rhthm, try to take this sound on here 04:38:528 - ?
    

alacat wrote:

yo

[General]

1. drum-hitclap has delay, Please use this (remove delay
   http://puu.sh/qnmEj/ac007d7b1a.zip thanks!

[This song is about a magic love]

1. OD +1? sure
2. 00:07:708 (8) - You didn't take the sound on here 00:09:700 - . also seems overmapping 00:07:825 - . try to use one circle instead of 1/4 slider to 00:07:708 - changed
3. 00:29:973 (2) - How abour this pattern ? new sound from here 00:30:208 -
   i like it as it is but a lot of people have said this so ill change it
4. 00:47:083 (5) - add a new combo same your previous pattern done
5. 01:20:364 (5,6) - prefer to use ctrl + g flow :p changed
6. 01:23:762 (4) - I feel this jump is a little hard for reading, try this?
   
   SPOILER

   
   changed
7. 02:48:489 (3) - forgot to add a new combo like 02:18:489 (1) - changed

Good luck, Azer thanks <3

iyasine wrote:

hi Azer Kevin~ , thanks for mod req

[This song is about a magic love]

1. 00:00:208 - add note ? i dont like starting with circle and its quiet anyway, its ok
2. 01:16:379 (2) - whistle ? synthesizer flow changed
3. 01:40:286 (1) - try this ~ x:239 y:177 i prefer it like it is
4. 02:25:286 (4) - additions Normal changed previous one too
5. 02:45:676 - 02:46:145 - whistle~ (02:00:676 - 02:01:145 - pattern) changed

good luck( ˘ω˘ ) thanks for modding!

alacat wrote:

[This song is about a magic love]

1. 04:15:442 (2) - ^ 02:15:442 (1) - added
2. 04:37:473 (2) - it's should be 1/6 sounds like 02:15:442 (1,2,3) - . oh yeah, fixed!
   
3. 04:38:411 (2,3) - I have a sense of discomfort with this rhthm, try to take this sound on here 04:38:528 - ? I think I get what you mean here, however i still prefer to follow the whole synth sound with one slider!
   

iyasine wrote:

hi Azer Kevin~ , thanks for mod req

[This song is about a magic love]

1. 03:48:723 (5) - sampleset Normal good catch
2. 05:14:739 (2,3) - try this design , 04:32:786 (1) - 04:33:723 (1) - pattern interesting suggestion, done
   
   img