Good. Put this thread to good use!KaaiYukiChan wrote:
i'm Full =3=
thanks for the slider foods XD
Yeah, it's feel very good when making 3-node(very simple) sliders. I love it so much :3LKs wrote:
I feel good with making 3-node(very simple) sliders :>
That's not the solution. What you want to do is get your slider anchors/nodes symmetric, then use the scale function, getting the shortest possible slider.Tshemmp wrote:
This slider ist not perfectly symmetric. Maybe you can move the second red node one grid down.
The scale tool should always be a last resort, because it's not entirely accurate. It throws points off ever so slightly.those wrote:
That's not the solution. What you want to do is get your slider anchors/nodes symmetric, then use the scale function, getting the shortest possible slider.Tshemmp wrote:
This slider ist not perfectly symmetric. Maybe you can move the second red node one grid down.
Blankets are definitely my bag at the moment. Every time I lay out some sliders, I wonder if I should make anything blanket. Of course, too many blankets become boring and using interesting, irregular construction that deliberately avoids potential blankets can be just as sexy in itself.Derekku wrote:
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
all of these slider blankets
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
I said random, didn't I?D33d wrote:
If that is a serious attempt at a slider, then you obviously haven't learned from the thread.
Random doesn't mean shitty.iYoonaRawrx wrote:
I said random, didn't I?D33d wrote:
If that is a serious attempt at a slider, then you obviously haven't learned from the thread.