yeah fixed stuff
forum
OK Go - WTF?
posted
Total Posts
70
Topic Starter
Slider speed changes are so small that more than 3 unique speeds shouldn't cause a problem
Just saw the video..its..interesting~
All looks good
Bubbled
Just saw the video..its..interesting~
All looks good
Bubbled
It's called structure, and it's good.Natteke wrote:
My reaction would get me banned
EDIT: meh I get too worked up
structureperfectpatternsperfectslidersperfectperfect < fun
This map is great, but the copypasting is a kick in the nuts.
This map is great, but the copypasting is a kick in the nuts.
Structure and gameplay can coexist happily~
And structure enhances the enjoyability of a map.
I don't think this was overly copypasted. I can't find anything used more than twice. (Not counting symmetry/adjacent patterns. If you hate these, you're just a troll.)
Copypaste-phobia is a preference. Let's just leave it at that.
And structure enhances the enjoyability of a map.
I don't think this was overly copypasted. I can't find anything used more than twice. (Not counting symmetry/adjacent patterns. If you hate these, you're just a troll.)
Copypaste-phobia is a preference. Let's just leave it at that.
ctrl c+v -> ctrl h = still copypasting.MetalMario201 wrote:
Structure and gameplay can coexist happily~
And structure enhances the enjoyability of a map.
I don't think this was overly copypasted. I can't find anything used more than twice. (Not counting symmetry/adjacent patterns. If you hate these, you're just a troll.)
Copypaste-phobia is a preference. Let's just leave it at that.
Still, I don't find this that much over copy pasta'd.
I mean, m980 did it way worse.
I like this map btw~ it has some sexy patterns in it and the diff names are just <3.
9/10'd
Where are you getting this idea from? I pay attention to criticism, and you'll find when my maps get modded that I either make changes or offer a reason why not. (which is more than can be said for the majority >,>)Natteke wrote:
Well, you won't ever listen to other people's opinions, will you.
I try to make maps that will please as many as possible, but I won't do things I strongly believe make the map worse.
GladiOol wrote:
ctrl c+v -> ctrl h = still copypasting.
MetalMario201 wrote:
(Not counting symmetry/adjacent patterns. If you hate these, you're just a troll.)
I'm definitely not a hater but I'd just like to point this out:
00:12:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Four times the same
00:27:691 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ...
00:35:691 (2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ same as above
01:03:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Basicly four times the same
01:19:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Two times the same
01:28:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This part looks very familiar
02:22:491 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Two times the same
02:30:491 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Two times the same
02:38:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - This part looks familiar
02:46:091 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ...
02:54:091 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ same as above
It's ok to copy something but it gets too repetitive like this. You can also copy/paste and then rearrange the notes. I'd give the map a 7 if I'd vote.
00:12:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Four times the same
00:27:691 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ...
00:35:691 (2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ same as above
01:03:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Basicly four times the same
01:19:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Two times the same
01:28:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This part looks very familiar
02:22:491 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Two times the same
02:30:491 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Two times the same
02:38:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - This part looks familiar
02:46:091 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ...
02:54:091 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ same as above
It's ok to copy something but it gets too repetitive like this. You can also copy/paste and then rearrange the notes. I'd give the map a 7 if I'd vote.
SuperMaay wrote:
yesLesjuh wrote:
Love it <3
Lesjuh wrote:
This map is great, but the copypasting is a kick in the nuts.
that about sums up the whole map.Lesjuh wrote:
I'm definitely not a hater but I'd just like to point this out:
00:12:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Four times the same
00:27:691 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ...
00:35:691 (2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ same as above
01:03:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Basicly four times the same
01:19:091 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Two times the same
01:28:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - This part looks very familiar
02:22:491 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Two times the same
02:30:491 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Two times the same
02:38:291 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - This part looks familiar
02:46:091 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ...
02:54:091 (1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - ^ same as above
It's ok to copy something but it gets too repetitive like this. You can also copy/paste and then rearrange the notes. I'd give the map a 7 if I'd vote.
You trollraters are a joke. Lowest rated map ever, are you fucking kidding?
spaceMetalMario201 wrote:
map awareness
blank
2/10
Thanks for your insight!dNextGen wrote:
2/10
NotShinta wrote:
Thanks for your insight!dNextGen wrote:
2/10
You know your rating system is broken when a map that's a bit repetitive gets rated lower than Timebomb and FUCKING 'SMILE'
Mashley wrote:
You know your rating system is broken when a map that's a bit repetitive gets rated lower than Timebomb and FUCKING 'SMILE'
Ranked by LartoNotShinta wrote:
spaceMetalMario201 wrote:
Ranked by Larto
Topic Starter
best map quality : rating ratio ever
damn, I missed the fun part of discussion
Seems like "the quality" doesn't equally mean that the map is fun to play.RandomJibberish wrote:
best map quality : rating ratio ever
Topic Starter
I find it more fun than timebomb srsly
Yet you do bother.RandomJibberish wrote:
Ratings are innacurate and not worth paying attention to.
Edit: by the way I just noticed the timing is off lol
You shouldn't compare the rating on your map to a map that was ranked 3 years ago.
Think about it this way, no oneever hardly rates Timebomb anymore, so if it makes you feel better, the rating on it would probably have been worse than your map.
Your map has what, 35 something votes? give it a few days, if it's good the rating will get better.
Think about it this way, no one
Your map has what, 35 something votes? give it a few days, if it's good the rating will get better.
...no he doesn't? He's taking it better than most people would.Natteke wrote:
Yet you do bother.RandomJibberish wrote:
Ratings are innacurate and not worth paying attention to.
Can I join pointless rating convo too? 
ITT, downvoting trolls trying to defend their position
Topic Starter
ITT my post is misinterpreted as me caring due to being taken out of contextNatteke wrote:
Yet you do bother.RandomJibberish wrote:
Ratings are innacurate and not worth paying attention to.
At first I was like "wat" at the copy pasta and arguing and blah blah blah. However, the more and more I played this, the more and more I liked it. Perhaps not 9 or 10 in my book, but still fun and a bit challenging (at least for me trying to use multiple mods xp).
The only thing that concerns me now is the timing. It's definitely early just by listening to the metronome, and I was 10-15ms late when playtesting. +10 local offset seemed to work best for me, though, so I really suggest that an online offset be added.
EDIT: ohay, +10 is what Larto had in his diff :c
The only thing that concerns me now is the timing. It's definitely early just by listening to the metronome, and I was 10-15ms late when playtesting. +10 local offset seemed to work best for me, though, so I really suggest that an online offset be added.
EDIT: ohay, +10 is what Larto had in his diff :c
this thread wrote:
wahhhh why so low rating you guys suck get out of my osu
Blue Dragon wrote:
my map got rated low too can i complain ;_;
people wrote:
no get out
i dont like this way to complaining sth....(vote 1...) those slides are basic on the video ><
anyway...well done ><
Your map didn't get rated 6 or whatever, it was rated averagely. Yeah, I won't go further.Blue Dragon wrote:
this thread wrote:
wahhhh why so low rating you guys suck get out of my osuBlue Dragon wrote:
my map got rated low too can i complain ;_;people wrote:
no get out
btw favourite thread ever guys
NotShinta wrote:
Your map didn't get rated 6 or whatever, it was rated averagely. Yeah, I won't go further.
btw favourite thread ever guys
3.9 = averagely?
This 5.6 is like what happened with my map, it will get better anytime soon.
I think you should know what you're talking, bro.
+ego
star rating is srs bsns
Topic Starter
I like how everyone has assumed I care
I don't care about the rating of my map, I care about how the star rating system sucks
I don't care about the rating of my map, I care about how the star rating system sucks
Actually, I think the first verse could have used more than 1 pattern. I'm a massive symmetry supporter, but that was clearly overdoing it. That said, the rest of it is amazing. I'd love to see RandomJibberish give some Yellow Zebra or IOSYS song this treatment and see what happens to user ratings.
I'd love to see RandomJibberish give some Yellow Zebra or IOSYS song this treatment and see what happens to user ratings.DO IT!
But don't touch instrumental maps, lol.
Haru/Viotex instruments go go gotieff wrote:
I'd love to see RandomJibberish give some Yellow Zebra or IOSYS song this treatment and see what happens to user ratings.DO IT!
But don't touch instrumental maps, lol.
I'll get a heart attack. Thank you.dNextGen wrote:
Haru/Viotex instruments go go go