1. The Song Is About a Tragic War (5,41 stars, 1294 notes)

The Fetish wrote:

Hai cutie.

SPOILER

Hopefully you remember what I said about perfect stacks. There's only I few that I had issues reading but I'll go through and point out some stacks that need fixing along with everything else.

Notes like 00:03:022 (2) - And 00:04:942 (5) - In general you should probably stack normally below the slider ends. Just makes it look cleaner

00:04:462 (3,4) - Normal stack these, looks really weird at 0.15x spacing.

00:21:502 (2,3,6,7) - Don't see why you made the first set a perfect stack and the second a normal one, keep them both the same. Might be better to just c/p this and similar repeat sections and stacking them normally.

00:26:422 (5,1,3) - Move these up a tiny bit. Stack the 1 ontop the 3, the same way you did it with the next combo.

00:28:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - I feel like this section might look better if you just c/p this combo and then keep rotating it each time.

00:36:502 (1,2,3) - Spacing here is uneven.

00:38:422 (1,2,3) - ^ But this seems intentional, and it flows well so its fine either way.

00:41:302 (1,2,3) - Again, uneven spacing.

00:43:342 (1,2,3,4) - ^ (Fine either way)

00:44:182 (1,2,3) - ^ (Fine either way)

00:54:262 (3,4,5) - ^

00:56:182 (3,4,5) - ^

01:00:022 (3,4,5) - ^

01:08:182 (3) - Shape this slider so it doesn't overlap with the previous one at the end.

01:12:022 (1,2,3,4,5) - Might be better to space this evenly.

01:14:182 (2,3,4) - I had trouble seeing this stack when I first played this. Stack them normally instead.

01:16:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - This stream is so ugly, pls fix. Switch the spacing and combo every 4 notes as well.

01:24:022 (3,4,5) - Spacing.

01:26:182 (4,5,1) - ^

01:26:902 (3,4,5,6) - ^

01:28:822 (3) - Blanket this better.

01:39:382 (3,4,5) - Spacing.

01:40:582 (4,5,1) - ^

01:45:382 (4,5,1) - ^

01:46:102 (3,4,5) - ^

01:48:262 (4,5,1) - ^

01:50:902 (1,1,2,1) - The way this is stacked makes it seem like a normal stream, might be better to move 01:50:902 (1) - off the stack to make it more readable. Same goes for later on where you used the same pattern.

01:51:862 (2,3,4) - Readability issues with this one first time around as well. Stack normally.

01:53:302 (1,2,3) - Try and keep this triple identical to ^

01:54:982 (4,1) - Normal stack these.

02:02:182 (2,3,4) - Stack this normally like the last two, just for consistency sake.

02:04:102 (2,3,4) - ^

02:04:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Refer to what I said about the other stream.

02:12:022 (3,4,5) - Spacing.

02:13:942 (3,4) - Stack these a bit cleaner.

02:14:902 (3,4,5,6,1) - Spacing.

02:15:862 (1) - Id put the preview point right on top the white tick here personally. Also Mute the slider end w/ Soft sample.

02:23:542 (1,1,2,1) - Same as before, looks like a normal stream, unstack the first note.

02:24:382 (2) - Blanket looks a little off.

02:29:302 (3,4) - Stack these properly, same as I mentioned before.

02:30:262 (3,4,5,6,1) - Spacing.

02:38:902 (1,1,2,1) - Same issue as the last two.

02:44:182 (4,5,6,7,8) - Spacing.

02:49:462 (2) - Stack this under the slider end normally instead.

03:15:862 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - This is fine but it just needs fine tuning to make it a smoother circle.

03:25:462 (1) - Move this down to make a triangle with the previous two notes.

03:33:502 (2) - Stack normally under the slider.

03:33:622 (3) - I think this might look better if you blanket it around the previous slider instead.

03:39:382 (3) - Blanket isn't perfect.

03:41:782 (4) - Nothing wrong with this, but maybe try something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/3717246 (The 5 is a little off but you get the idea)

03:42:742 (1) - Stack this on the previous slider.

03:45:622 (6,7) - Normal stack should work better here.

03:48:022 (7,8,9) - Spacing.

03:52:822 (3,4,5) - Spacing is only off by a tiny little bit.

03:53:302 (6,7) - Stack normally.

03:53:542 (7,8,9) - Spacing off a little again.

04:15:382 (1,2,3) - Spacing.

04:19:222 (1,2,3) - ^

04:26:182 (2,3,4) - 04:28:102 (2,3,4) - Try and keep these two the same.

04:28:822 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Same as before, just needs smoothing out a bit.

04:36:022 (3,4,5) - Spacing.

04:37:942 (3,4) - Stack normally.

04:38:182 (4,5,1) - Spacing.

04:38:902 (3) - Start this combo stacked under 04:38:422 (1) -

04:38:902 (3,4,5,6,1) - Spacing.

04:47:542 (1,1,2,1) - Same as the last three.

04:51:382 (3,4,5) - Spacing.

04:51:622 (5,3) - Might look better to start the 3 stacked under the end of the 5.

04:53:302 (3,4) - Stack normally.

04:54:262 (3,4,5,6,1) - Spacing.

04:55:222 (3,4,5,1) - This is a similar case to a few other sections I've pointed out. With the equal spacing it looks like a stream, try spacing the slider differently that the triple, or just move it so it isn't in line.

04:57:142 (3) - Move this a tiny little bit so it isn't overlapping with the previous slider.

04:59:062 (4) - Fix blanket.

05:02:902 (1,1,2,1) - Same as all the others I pointed out.

Long post but most of it is pointing out spacing.

GL cutie. <3

Cheesecake wrote:

Heyyyy

[Love and War]

00:55:222 (3,4,5) - All of the patterns before and after flow nicely and then this triangle is a bit too sharp, consider changing it to a square
01:28:342 (1,2) - Blanket maybe
01:32:062 (7,1,3) - ^
01:35:782 (2) - Change this to the same angle as 01:35:542 (1) maybe?
01:36:022 (1,2,3) - Two blankets
01:39:862 (1,2) - Blanket
01:44:662 (1,3) - Blanket - adding this in here, you could try something like this to keep the aesthetic you're going for while also having it blanketed http://puu.sh/kwdAy/4f04c10409.jpg
01:46:942 (3,4) - Blanket
02:08:182 (2) - I can hear why this is in 1/16, but there's a bug that makes it easy to sliderbreak on these, where the timing window after is smaller than before since missing a repeat causes a sliderbreak, so you can change it for gameplay purposes but it's not really needed if you dont want to
02:17:302 (1,2) - ^
02:20:182 (1,3) - ^
02:27:862 (1,2) - ^
02:36:502 (1,2) - ^
03:55:222 (6,7) - ^
04:51:622 (5,1) - ^
04:59:302 (5,1,3) - ^

Great map and song

HighTec wrote:

boo
I have nothing to do in my holiday so here you go

free mod inc (Love And War)

General:
Change OD to fixed 8 or 8.5, the weird OD doesn't make sense to me (same for HP, change it to 6)
Maybe change the 'A' in the diffname to an 'a' for the fancy looks

00:28:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - This is just confusing, it sorta breaks the flow - Plays fine alternating :p
00:46:102 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Maybe play aroud with SV as well? - That'd be unneeded and i am lazy hehe
01:01:462 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - Same
01:16:102 (2,3,4) - Spacing is a little too big - Fixed!
01:42:742 (1,2) - Turn the second one so that they are mirrored, just plays better - This is the same as the ones before, just made the spacing a bit smaller
01:51:142 (1,2,1) - Little more spacing between these - Increased it a liiiitle bit
02:23:782 (1,2,1) - Same - Increased a little bit
02:39:142 (1,2,1) - I think you get it - This one seems fine tho
02:50:422 (4,5,6,7) - Maybe aim these more towards the slider coming next - Done!
02:54:742 (1,2) - Bad overlapping - Did this so it wouldn't stack perfectly for reading purpose
03:15:142 (5,6,7) - A little less perhaps - Done!
03:13:702 (5,3) - Bad overlapping - Fixed!
04:09:982 (2,3,2,3) - Mirror them? - This will do just fine i think
04:30:742 (9) - Space better please ;w; - What's wrong with this?
04:47:782 (1,2,1) - You know it - Done!
05:09:862 (4,1,2,3) - Maybe fill this up - It sounded empty indeed so i did this!

For questions on what I meant spam me on skype, osu or whatever you can think of

Such goodness, keep this up. I'd say go for ranked, you deserve it more than I do

Note: I singletapped everything and made my opinion based on that (no alternating please)
Thanks for the mod <3

1. All the doubles like 00:06:142 (1,2,3,4) are pretty bad as they give wrong emphasis, the white and red tics are more important than the blue tics, but they are stacked under them and you have to jump to the blue ones : \ You did it right at 00:02:422 (3,4,1) - 00:05:422 (2,3) and 00:10:102 (3,4,5) though
2. Also keep your NCs consistent in this first part, rn they are sometimes on the sliders, sometimes on the circle after and sometimes on the second note after - the last version makes the most sense to me, but you should keep it consistent either way
3. You mapped the part starting at 00:17:302 really inconsistent - Listen to the song more closely and try to see what beats are actually present - Here's my observation / suggestion: and
4. In the next part you seem to focus on the vocals, but it kinda breaks when you map some vocals on slidertails, e.g. 00:35:302 and 00:42:502 -, and especially when you overmap things like 00:36:022 (3,4) - 00:37:942 (3,4) -(here there's vocals on the second slider but not on the first!) and 00:45:622 (3,4) -(same again!).
5. 00:43:342 (1) - This overmapped beat gets the same emphasis as (2) and (3), although on those two thee are actual beats
6. 00:34:582 (1,2) - Not really bad but it's a bit weird as the vocals are somewhere between the head and tail of the second slider, so I'd recommend repeating the first one and then putting a circle afterwards, but I guess that would break your patterning ^^
7. 01:04:342 (1,2,3,4) - you give (1,2,3) the no emphasis but (4) extremely much which makes no sense as there's the upbeat at (3) which is way more important than (4), there's really nothing special on (4) except the vocals which are equally strong on all four beats. So either you give (3) more emphasis than (4) or give all of them the same as the vocals are very strong here so that would emphasize them well
8. 01:06:262 (1,2,3,4) - (2) getting more emphasis than (3) this time, just as wrong as the previous one
9. 01:10:102 (1) - Unlike the previous two sliders, this one has a drum-hit on its tail, so I'd shorten it and put a circle there
10. 01:10:582 (1,2) - Don't overmap those, the previous slider had vocals on them which justified the overmap, but these don't
11. 01:12:022 (1,2,3,4,5) - Not giving any emphasis at all this time lulz. Also, you at least gave (5) its well-deserved emphasis previously, but nothing here O.o
12. 01:14:182 (2,3,4) - Mapping this as a triplet gives the wrong impression that all three notes share something, which they don't - (1) only voice, (2) only drums, just (3) has both - I'd recommend replacing the first two with a 1/4-slider. Just to show the difference: 01:16:102 (2,3,4) is a good one as there's drumhits on all three of them
13. 01:16:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Give this stream more love instead of just mapping it in one chain with a bit of increasing spacing (although for the record there is actually nothing in the music that is increasing) and only minor direction changes that might look nice in the editor but don't do a thing ingame - Put some real edges in there, and maybe map 01:18:262 (5,6,7,8) as 1/4-sliders since there's actually different stuff happening than before
14. 01:20:662 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Why do you decrease spacing in the second combo when there's nothing changing? Space it out until 01:22:582 (1) where different stuff is happening - 01:21:622 (1,2,3,4,1,2) got almost the same spacing although it's two different kind of sounds. Apllies for the rest of the Kiai
15. Most of this Kiai plays really weird because the spacing is very inconsistent, there are a lot of places like 01:28:702 (2,3,4) and 01:29:542 (5,6,1) where you use the same distance for almost double the interval which feels really off
16. 01:32:662 (3,4) - This is especially low lol
17. Keep the spacing between the same things similar, like 01:42:742 (1,2) and 01:41:782 (1,2) it's really irritating like this
18. Damn the second Kiai, with the vocals, is pretty nice
19. I don't like 01:50:902 (1,1) very much though as it breaks the nice flow, but that's just my opinion
20. 01:51:862 (2,3,4) - Again you could turn the first two into a slider to separate them from the vocal on the last note
21. 01:52:342 (1,2,3,4) - this again ^^

Bonsai wrote:

omg the first time in forever that I accidentally write everything in the brwoser again and boom there I go accidentally refreshing the page losing everything.. x.x Just gonna try to write everything real quick again

coming from #modreqs btw, I like the song

1. All the doubles like 00:06:142 (1,2,3,4) are pretty bad as they give wrong emphasis, the white and red tics are more important than the blue tics, but they are stacked under them and you have to jump to the blue ones : \ You did it right at 00:02:422 (3,4,1) - 00:05:422 (2,3) and 00:10:102 (3,4,5) though - The emphasis in the beginning was completely random, thank you for waking me up!
2. Also keep your NCs consistent in this first part, rn they are sometimes on the sliders, sometimes on the circle after and sometimes on the second note after - the last version makes the most sense to me, but you should keep it consistent either way - I have no idea what inconsistencies there are
3. You mapped the part starting at 00:17:302 really inconsistent - Listen to the song more closely and try to see what beats are actually present - Here's my observation / suggestion: and - ???
4. In the next part you seem to focus on the vocals, but it kinda breaks when you map some vocals on slidertails, e.g. 00:35:302 and 00:42:502 -, and especially when you overmap things like 00:36:022 (3,4) - 00:37:942 (3,4) -(here there's vocals on the second slider but not on the first!) and 00:45:622 (3,4) -(same again!). - If you listen carefully to the sounds in the background you'll hear what im mapping to
5. 00:43:342 (1) - This overmapped beat gets the same emphasis as (2) and (3), although on those two thee are actual beats - I have no idea what you mean by this...
6. 00:34:582 (1,2) - Not really bad but it's a bit weird as the vocals are somewhere between the head and tail of the second slider, so I'd recommend repeating the first one and then putting a circle afterwards, but I guess that would break your patterning ^^
7. 01:04:342 (1,2,3,4) - you give (1,2,3) the no emphasis but (4) extremely much which makes no sense as there's the upbeat at (3) which is way more important than (4), there's really nothing special on (4) except the vocals which are equally strong on all four beats. So either you give (3) more emphasis than (4) or give all of them the same as the vocals are very strong here so that would emphasize them well - I gave (4) to (5) more emphasis, wasn't really paying attention to (3) to (4) though... Keeping this anyways
8. 01:06:262 (1,2,3,4) - (2) getting more emphasis than (3) this time, just as wrong as the previous one - I tried spacing (3) more, hope that helps?
9. 01:10:102 (1) - Unlike the previous two sliders, this one has a drum-hit on its tail, so I'd shorten it and put a circle there - I'll keep this
10. 01:10:582 (1,2) - Don't overmap those, the previous slider had vocals on them which justified the overmap, but these don't - The second slider is mapped on a drum though
11. 01:12:022 (1,2,3,4,5) - Not giving any emphasis at all this time lulz. Also, you at least gave (5) its well-deserved emphasis previously, but nothing here O.o - ???
12. 01:14:182 (2,3,4) - Mapping this as a triplet gives the wrong impression that all three notes share something, which they don't - (1) only voice, (2) only drums, just (3) has both - I'd recommend replacing the first two with a 1/4-slider. Just to show the difference: 01:16:102 (2,3,4) is a good one as there's drumhits on all three of them - You're right, changed it
13. 01:16:822 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Give this stream more love instead of just mapping it in one chain with a bit of increasing spacing (although for the record there is actually nothing in the music that is increasing) and only minor direction changes that might look nice in the editor but don't do a thing ingame - Put some real edges in there, and maybe map 01:18:262 (5,6,7,8) as 1/4-sliders since there's actually different stuff happening than before - I personally wasn't satisfied with any stream in my map. Your suggestion has brought up another idea though, thanks!
14. 01:20:662 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Why do you decrease spacing in the second combo when there's nothing changing? Space it out until 01:22:582 (1) where different stuff is happening - 01:21:622 (1,2,3,4,1,2) got almost the same spacing although it's two different kind of sounds. Apllies for the rest of the Kiai
15. Most of this Kiai plays really weird because the spacing is very inconsistent, there are a lot of places like 01:28:702 (2,3,4) and 01:29:542 (5,6,1) where you use the same distance for almost double the interval which feels really off - tried to make the spacing i little more consistent
16. 01:32:662 (3,4) - This is especially low lol - I did something different
17. Keep the spacing between the same things similar, like 01:42:742 (1,2) and 01:41:782 (1,2) it's really irritating like this - Fixed!
18. Damn the second Kiai, with the vocals, is pretty nice - Thanks <3
19. I don't like 01:50:902 (1,1) very much though as it breaks the nice flow, but that's just my opinion - That point is meant to pause the flow
20. 01:51:862 (2,3,4) - Again you could turn the first two into a slider to separate them from the vocal on the last note - I'll see what i i'll do with these
21. 01:52:342 (1,2,3,4) - this again ^^

I'll stop now because I'm really mad from writing almost all of this twice, I think most of this stuff repeats over the whole map anyways so just try to understand what I mean and look for similar stuff! ^^

Tenderz wrote:

[This song is about clicking circles]
00:01:942 (1,2,3) - Use constant 1.5x here, variable jump in the start plays forced - Changed the spacing to less than 1.5x in the beginning
00:03:262 (1) - Use 1.5x spacing for these notes, just like the rest, bigger than that feels like too much and forced
00:09:742 (1,2) - Remove this and make 00:10:102 (3,4) - a tripple just like 00:10:942 (2,3,4) - I'll stick to what i have
00:10:102 (2) - Remove whisle, I think it's a bit too loud - Just lowered the volume
00:20:662 (2,1) - Sudden change in hitsounds
You should probably try to stick with one way of hitsounding and try not to change it every 10 seconds. - Re-did the hitsounding there
00:33:382 (4) - Breaks flow with previous note, since they're slightly curved outwards, makes them kind of weird to follow for me - You're right, fixed~
00:33:622 (1,2) - These slow 1/2 sliders don't match the music, reference this part -> 00:35:542 (1,2,3,4) - Tried something else
00:52:102 (2) - Sudden difficulty upgrade, feels a bit out of place. You could probably keep it the slow way and make a bigger impact when the next part drops. The change may feel odd but the song also changes there
01:14:422 (4) - Since you can't really feel the impact of these sliders here I would juse make 01:14:182 (2,3,4) - equaly spaced - I think this is just fine
01:16:102 (2,3,4) - and here, etc.
01:18:022 (3) - I would keep this spaced at 1x max, but thats just me
01:33:142 (4,5,6,7) - Wiggle pattern makes these jumps a bit too intense for this part - Made it less wiggly
01:53:302 (1,2,3) - Make these regulary spaced tripples, no reason to do otherwise, as well for all the ones that come after this in this part - Alright alright
02:34:942 (3) - Maybe find another place for this, flow break here is a bit confusing Tried it again, plays fine. - kek
02:50:422 (4,5,6,7) - Maybe turn these more into a stair (aka less gap between these, angle a bit) - Done
02:58:102 (6) - Needless gap - Circles are now touching eachother
03:05:302 (1,2) - Fill the space between this - Done!
03:11:302 (6,7,8) - Don't space em like this, this really doesn't match anything in the music here
03:13:942 (1,2) - Align - Oops my bad, fixed!
03:35:062 (1,2,3) - This doesn't flow well - Tried something
03:56:422 (2,3,4,5) - Fix flow - Tried something
04:01:942 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Don't drop from 04:00:502 (1,1,1) - into a pattern like this, you should probably put something else here like 00:15:502 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - Done!
04:05:782 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - This fixed 1/4 mapping really falls out of place with all the other parts around it
You could however move it to 03:58:102 (1) because you start slowly there, and then build up to patterns like 04:09:742 (1,2,3) - and eventually 04:11:542 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Nah, I'll be keeping this
04:46:342 (2,3,4) - Fix flow, angle is too sharp - Tried something
05:09:622 (3,4) - These sliders are not aligned - Fixed??
05:10:822 (4,1) - A tripple would fit the music better - Done!

Most of these apply to multiple places, but I guess you'll figure it out

01:43:702 (1) - These parts were amazing <3

Very nice and fresh map, I'll make sure to bother you until you rank this \:D/
oh god

CypCypCyprian wrote:

omg the previous beginning was better