I don't think a list would work, It's extremely hard to make a comprehensive set of rules that will cover everything. It's all subjective, in some situations a certain thing will be ok, and on others not. In the end it's the sum of a lot of things that determines if it is 'appropriate' or not, and that is impossible to quantify with set rules. The best you can do is have some guidelines, and have the QAT or whoever make a ruling when it's unclear. And honestly, ambiguous rules like 'no panty shots' do more harm than good.
In my opinion, moderate amount of sexual themes should be ok. Mild sexual themes , that you can already find in popular media, don't do any harm to children so I don't see why it's important to be so intolerant of anything of that nature. Because you're not really protecting anyone or anything.
In my opinion, moderate amount of sexual themes should be ok. Mild sexual themes , that you can already find in popular media, don't do any harm to children so I don't see why it's important to be so intolerant of anything of that nature. Because you're not really protecting anyone or anything.
No. There is no reason to be so politically correct. Why do we need to be worried if people are 'offended' or not?Wafu wrote:
- Humiliation of any race or country (obviously, this might have exceptions - If song said "I slog one's guts out as a German worker", that would actually not be that offensive - Most people know that German products are really good quality and that they really are perfectionists when it comes to work, I think regular guy from there would just smirk a little ignoring it completely, but if I actually say "As dumb as Czech government" (Just for example said my country because I did not want to be offensive to anyone, all is just example), then it would be offensive to those who actually like that government, but actually the thing about German is imo adequate - it is nothing what should really offend certain person.