#KRÓWKA
we did talk about it a little, but I did say the artist name is still not confirmed.....Krfawy wrote:
But I think it's ready so after a discussion with neonat I'm going to rebubble it once again.
#KRÓWCIA
Eastern artists must be written in the proper 'surname firstname' format (e.g. Japanese/Chinese/Korean). For artists which have a preferred romanisation, use this one. If you're unsure of your artist's name, then check previously ranked maps, Google, Wikipedia, or ask a BN for help.Note the "For artists which have a preferred romanisation, use this one", "Tsubaki" is the official romanisation used for her songs, even though "夕月椿" (Yuuzuki Tsubaki) is her real name, which is how it is written in the official japanese metadata used for her songs.
In this case, it's not even the composer (すみじゅん / sumijun) being cited as the artist, but the vocalist, so in my mind there should be no reason not to cite the source artist as the circle which Tsubaki is collaborating with, Halozy. This can be seen in other recent maps, e.g. here (Halozy, not 美里), here, here and every other Genryuu Kaiko map (again Halozy, not ほたる / Hotaru), etc.Ranking Criteria wrote:
Tracks created by composers belonging to doujin circles should list the circle's name as the main composer. The sole exception to this is when a composer of a given circle is well-known enough by their own name. In this case, their own composer name may be used instead.
pishifat wrote:
me when i want food but dont want to wake up my roommates
01:29:896 - there's no percussion stuff in the song yet you're using hardcore drum hitsounds. if you want to compliment the song, do it in a way that's not the same as when you had drum stuff since like the song is just different than those parts yeah, i went a bit overboard here, changed
easy
01:04:158 (4,1,2,1,2) - so you've got an sv change, which is fine, but then your spacing becomes something that could be confusing for scrubs. 4->1 and 1->2 are visually pretty similar, yet one's 1/1 and the other is 3/2. if you were to use higher spacing the slower sv section (like 1.2x) the issue would be nonexistent changed
normal
00:48:092 (4,5) - ending the strongest thing on a slidertail pleaseno. ctrlging those like 00:27:109 (4,5) - would be great changed
01:03:831 (5,1,2,1,2) - tbh kinda same thing as easy. even 1.1x would be fine changed
01:25:552 (1,1) - i know it's like only 1/2 away from the recommended recovery time but like usually maps get killed regardless of that. id prefer if you just use the same rhythm as easy but if you wanna risk it idc that much changed this part
advanced
00:15:552 (3) - 00:20:798 (3) - if you don't want to include 1/4 on this diff, just use 1/2 (which would be best). if you're okay with using 1/4, use 2 circles. don't use a blue tick 1/4 slider tho since it's like clicking on the weak thing + ignoring the strong thing + polarity ruined (since it plays like bleh) + ugh kill me just do it this was originally two circles but CB recommended me not to do that, tho he did not tell me to replace them by this so i think im just gonna keep those 2 circles like before
hard
01:13:340 (4) - could you not put a slidertail on the climax of the buildup thing
if you wanna follow vocals you could do efdxzc or if don't care about vocals you could do fdfdfs or sdfdsf so many options better than slidertail on loud stuff changed
lunatic
00:27:109 (4) - 00:48:093 (1) - combo consistency tho yep
i dunno what the drama is about metadata, but if it's a big deal you can just fix it after a qat says it's wrong
why you not look beatmap tsubaki - kyun kyun tamaran inaba-tan.......?neonat wrote:
Tsubaki is ENS, that so-called rule is stupid anyway. Tsubaki > Halozy anyway. ugh.
Also when it comes to listing the artist down, it's the Vocals, not the arrangement or composer, unless stated specifically on the spine.
this one is an old map, rules might have been different then, or not enforced as seriously as now.LigerZero wrote:
why you not look beatmap tsubaki - kyun kyun tamaran inaba-tan.......?
it does indeed play a little better with this, though you're probably the first one noticing it, so I have no idea if this is really a big deal.Azer wrote:
I think this needs a +10 offset, although it could just be me.