Looking for 3 star stream maps? Im new to osu and I need practice with streams!
Thanks
Thanks
forum
Good 3 Star Stream Maps
posted
Total Posts
109
I like these maps (all three star):
(3.97) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/26158
(3.95) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/375036
(3.71) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/87580
(3.76) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/143243
(3.70) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/46842
(3.61) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/315552
(3.65) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/125701 (Hard)
(2.86) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/83712 (2 stars but nice for finger control)
Some general advice would be to focus on your finger control in every map you play. Focus on good accuracy with triples and stacks as well as streams.
(3.97) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/26158
(3.95) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/375036
(3.71) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/87580
(3.76) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/143243
(3.70) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/46842
(3.61) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/315552
(3.65) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/125701 (Hard)
(2.86) https://osu.ppy.sh/b/83712 (2 stars but nice for finger control)
Some general advice would be to focus on your finger control in every map you play. Focus on good accuracy with triples and stacks as well as streams.
Minecraft wow
Mnecraft World of Warcraft?Kheldragar wrote:
Minecraft wow
i can't tell if this is is serious
I clicked the first 3 maps and they're like .1-.2 away from 4 starsBarusamikosu wrote:
I like these maps (all three star):
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/26158
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/375036
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/87580
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/143243
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/46842
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/315552
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/125701 (Hard)
https://osu.ppy.sh/b/83712 (2 stars but nice for finger control)
Some general advice would be to focus on your finger control in every map you play. Focus on good accuracy with triples and stacks as well as streams.
He said 3 stars; 3.99 is still 3.
I don't think I've seen any stream heavy maps really low in star rating but if you have anything easier please share so I can try it.buny wrote:
I clicked the first 3 maps and they're like .1-.2 away from 4 stars
ZenithPhantasm
I know you're trying to sound like a smartass, but 3.99 =/= 3, and rounded up it's 4Kheldragar wrote:
He said 3 stars; 3.99 is still 3.
I don't play low star maps at all, but I'd assume they'd just be ~130 bpm 5 notes at a time. The OP was pretty vague in specifying exactly what maps he wants, seeing as how nearly every map that has a stream in it is going to get its difficulty boosted a lot higher than 3 starsBarusamikosu wrote:
I don't think I've seen any stream heavy maps really low in star rating but if you have anything easier please share so I can try it.buny wrote:
I clicked the first 3 maps and they're like .1-.2 away from 4 stars
Learning first time know the basis, you've got only about 600 PlayCount. Improve your accuracy first before it starts 3 stars.
buny wrote:
I know you're trying to sound like a smartass, but 3.99 =/= 3, and rounded up it's 4Kheldragar wrote:
He said 3 stars; 3.99 is still 3.
So you saying 3 stars is only 3.0-3.49? Really,
Because last time I checked 3.6 has a 3 in it and only the client does a rounding. Or do you mean to say that there should only be 3.00 maps. 3.99 is still 3 stars whether you like it or not. What world do we live in where a 4 star map has a 3 in it; I guess that's why it's called 4 stars.
numbers don't even matter if op struggles with achieving S ranks on normals
learn the basics first before trying to stream
learn the basics first before trying to stream
I'll probably make a collection of burst maps for newbies at some point. Anyways, I wasn't expecting OP to S the maps the first time, but rather to improve his scores on them as he gets better (I have a lot of slowstream maps I started playing early and went from ~80% acc to S/SS over time).buny wrote:
I don't play low star maps at all, but I'd assume they'd just be ~130 bpm 5 notes at a time. The OP was pretty vague in specifying exactly what maps he wants, seeing as how nearly every map that has a stream in it is going to get its difficulty boosted a lot higher than 3 stars
Last time I checked, as dictated by common sense, when people ask for 3* maps they usually mean: I want stuff AROUND 3*. Note that 3.99 is much closer to 4* than 3*.Kheldragar wrote:
So you saying 3 stars is only 3.0-3.49? Really,
Because last time I checked 3.6 has a 3 in it and only the client does a rounding. Or do you mean to say that there should only be 3.00 maps. 3.99 is still 3 stars whether you like it or not. What world do we live in where a 4 star map has a 3 in it; I guess that's why it's called 4 stars.
So 3* is at the focal point of what they're looking for, and the range of maps they want are centered close to 3*, for example, 2.8-3.2. Unless stated otherwise ofc (I want at least 3* or higher maps, I want maps that aren't higher than 3*, etc.)
I've never interpreted asking for 3 star maps meaning around 3.00; it's always meant 3.00-3.99 because by common sense all of those maps are officially 3 stars.
When I say I play 5 stars NO ONE has interpreted that as also including 4.8+ because those maps are not 5 stars.
When I say I play 5 stars NO ONE has interpreted that as also including 4.8+ because those maps are not 5 stars.
There's a sorting mode (recently played, collections, by artist, etc...) called difficulty I believe and it sorts maps exactly the way I described. as in ~2.5-3.5 go under 3 stars, 3.5-4.5 go under 4, etc. etc. Because again, common sense. Osu agrees as well. So I'm not sure of what your interpretation of "official" is in this case.Kheldragar wrote:
I've never interpreted asking for 3 star maps meaning around 3.00; it's always meant 3.00-3.99 because by common sense all of those maps are officially 3 stars.
When I say I play 5 stars NO ONE has interpreted that as also including 4.8+ because those maps are not 5 stars.
When people say 3* they're referring to the maps that are similar in difficulty. Noone really uses this to mean "has 3 in the first digit" Because with this kind of criteria it's just not very useful when it comes to trying to communicate things about similar difficulties since you've essentially arbitrarily created a silly grouping range where the beatmaps that fall in that range that you've created are not sorted in much of a meaningful way.
My logic when picking maps was similar to the kind you see in multiplayer lobbies.
For example: In a "4☆ Host Rotation" lobby, I've never really seen anybody complain if somebody picks a 4.8-4.9 star map.
Well, sorry for starting a shitstorm.
For example: In a "4☆ Host Rotation" lobby, I've never really seen anybody complain if somebody picks a 4.8-4.9 star map.
Well, sorry for starting a shitstorm.
Official as in the DEFINITION of 3 stars being a map whose difficulty begins with 3.xx
There's no reason for your "common sense" to mean 3 stars means around 3 as opposed to every diff including 3. NO ONE I have ever met refers to 5.5 as 6 star instead of 5.
There's no reason for your "common sense" to mean 3 stars means around 3 as opposed to every diff including 3. NO ONE I have ever met refers to 5.5 as 6 star instead of 5.