Don't look at the image above, it's a falsehood and fluke.
Here's a link to the benchmark;
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime
What's your reaction time osu?
forum
What is your reaction time?
posted
Total Posts
86
Topic Starter
Don't look at the image above, it's a falsehood and fluke.
Here's a link to the benchmark;
http://www.humanbenchmark.com/tests/reactiontime
What's your reaction time osu?
Interesting tool!
I wasn't even really trying.
You guys might want to click Save score so that you also get a percentage.
Well, I wouldn't be surprised if lots of them were from desperate people sending cheated results.Kouya- wrote:
279, my reaction time is so slow compared to top scores haha xD
299 ms
Memory I got 16,229 at level 11.
Memory I got 16,229 at level 11.
average 247, kinda happy with that
231 ms
I was higher when I wasn't in full screen.
Memory was 19,841 at level 10
I was higher when I wasn't in full screen.
Memory was 19,841 at level 10
Topic Starter
Interesting! Didn't know about the percentage.Nabile wrote:
I wasn't even really trying.
You guys might want to click Save score so that you also get a percentage.Well, I wouldn't be surprised if lots of them were from desperate people sending cheated results.Kouya- wrote:
279, my reaction time is so slow compared to top scores haha xD
didnt we already have such a thread
yeah we did but it's probably like 5 years old already
Topic Starter
Oh no, Mods are awake.LoliFlan wrote:
didnt we already have such a thread
Nice.silmarilen wrote:
yeah we did but it's probably like 5 years old already
Topic Starter
CptBlackBird wrote:
2fast4u
So.... FAST!
Must be a record
!
Topic Starter
Faster than me.Meow2 wrote:
I like your avatar by the way.
Topic Starter
Oh snap!Garpo wrote:
I see your 1 try and I raise you mine.
OH SNAP!FuZ wrote:
^)Garpo wrote:
I see your 1 try and I raise you mine.
how canFuZ wrote:
also,
humph
116
Conor wrote:
How dare you ignore my 11ms totally not pre-clicked screenshot that beats the totally legit 34ms reaction time click.Alucard wrote:
You're #1 in my book.
Totally not edited results. :3
Thank you !Conor wrote:
♪ You're an excellent clicker! ♪Nabile wrote:
Totally not edited results. :3
Seriously though, it's sad a perfectly fine thread had to be ruined by cheaters and foul play.
Well, hopefully people are going to keep posting honest results from now.
good enough, i guess
Topic Starter
Haha I forgot to update, however we're adding a new rule as well, thanks to Conor's feedback.Conor wrote:
How dare you ignore my 11ms totally not pre-clicked screenshot that beats the totally legit 34ms reaction time click.Alucard wrote:
You're #1 in my book.
Only screenshots of the 5/5 attempts for average.
I'm sure someone will find a way to edit the text though... sad life : L
Well i improved it to 176 but didnt took a screenshot, you can see it in the leaderboardConor wrote:
FuZ would currently be the fastest since he used all 5 tries and ended up with 192ms average (184ms on his last click attempt).
Anyway there's still a possibility to use the prediction "cheat" even with 5 attempts since a fail doesn't count as 1 attempt, this design is kinda shitty
I think you should remove that "fastest player" on your first post Alucard, if people see that they can be highlighted on the first post by doing a good score there will be more exploited scores imo, some people are taking these kind of things too seriously
Topic Starter
FuZ wrote:
Well i improved it to 176 but didnt took a screenshot, you can see it in the leaderboardConor wrote:
FuZ would currently be the fastest since he used all 5 tries and ended up with 192ms average (184ms on his last click attempt).
Anyway there's still a possibility to use the prediction "cheat" even with 5 attempts since a fail doesn't count as 1 attempt, this design is kinda shitty
I think you should remove that "fastest player" on your first post Alucard, if people see that they can be highlighted on the first post by doing a good score there will be more exploited scores imo, some people are taking these kind of things too seriously
Yeah I guess you're right.
It was fun while it lasted, even if it was short haha.
Topic Starter
Conor wrote:
If you want to use that rule then Garpo doesn't have the fastest recorded time since it was done in 2/5 attempts (his average from those 2 attempts was 172ms). FuZ would currently be the fastest since he used all 5 tries and ended up with 192ms average (184ms on his last click attempt).Alucard wrote:
Haha I forgot to update, however we're adding a new rule as well, thanks to Conor's feedback.
Only screenshots of the 5/5 attempts for average.
I'll never forget my legit standalone 114 though. Sadface. A lot of the results you're going to see are going to be preclicks or edited/hacked in some way or whatever. Be smart about what you choose I guess. Good luck for the rest of this thread.
114 is epic!
Thanks for stopping by and the advice.
i got 34000 at level 12 on memory
yet my memory sucks
guess it's all that hidden mod practice
yet my memory sucks
guess it's all that hidden mod practice
Topic Starter
OzzyOzrock wrote:
i got 34000 at level 12 on memory
yet my memory sucks
guess it's all that hidden mod practice
Haha, I'm sure your memory is great.
Also, I LOVE your avatar!
retry
Topic Starter
Yes you do!Harumi wrote:
that was fun
Topic Starter
Not bad! Better than what I can manage on 50 tries.Akatsukie wrote: