forum

US Air Force suffers collateral damage because of PS3 update

posted
Total Posts
18
Topic Starter
Nachy
Source




When Sony issued a recent PlayStation 3 update removing the device's ability to install alternate operating systems like Linux, it did so to protect copyrighted content—but several research projects suffered collateral damage.

The Air Force is one example. The Air Force Research Laboratory in Rome, New York picked up 336 PS3 systems in 2009 and built itself a 53 teraFLOP processing cluster. Once completed as a proof of concept, Air Force researchers then scaled up by a factor of six and went in search of 2,200 more consoles (later scaled back to 1,700). The $663,000 contract was awarded on January 6, 2010, to a small company called Fixstars that could provide 1,700 160GB PS3 systems to the government.

Getting that many units was difficult enough that the government required bidders to get a letter from Sony certifying that the units were actually available.
Dirt cheap computing

Another grotesque waste of taxpayer dollars? Exactly the opposite, according to research lab staff. Off-the-shelf PS3s could take advantage of Sony's hardware subsidy to get powerful Cell processors more cheaply than via any other solution.

"The Advanced Computing Architectures team at the Information Directorate considered several alternatives to arrive at the configuration of the proposed system, including the Sony BCU-100, IBM Blade Q22, and IBM PowerXCell 8i CAB accelerators cards," said the Air Force last year. "In particular, the performance capabilities of the Cell Broadband engine were examined in considerable detail on each of the algorithms."

The team also looked into using dual-quad-core Xeon servers for its cluster, going so far as to do a "detailed study of Xeon multithreading and SSE4 optimization on image processing intensive tasks." The hardware worked well, and it eventually came to serve as subcluster headnodes that sit between the PS3 cluster itself and the control terminals.

But building the entire cluster out of Xeons would cost "more than an order of magnitude greater than the PS3 technology." The team also looked into advanced GPGPUs but found that they worked best to "accelerate a subset of our algorithms, particularly the frontend processing and backend visualization, but lag the PS3 in the bulk of the calculations where processes need to intercommunicate and share memory beyond what is supported efficiently by the GPGPUs."
The initial test cluster (source: US Air Force)

The result was the 500 TeraFLOPS Heterogeneous Cluster powered by PS3s but connected to subcluster heads of dual-quad Xeons with multiple GPGPUs.

The Air Force team ordered the hardware, spent days unboxing it and imaging each unit to run Linux, and then... Sony removed the Linux install option a couple months later. (One can only imagine what happened to those 2,000 PS3 controllers and other unneeded accessories.)
Does it matter?

Sony's decision had no immediate impact on the cluster; for obvious reasons, the PS3s are not hooked into the PlayStation Network and don't need Sony's firmware updates. But what happens when a PS3 dies or needs repair? Tough luck.

We checked in with the Air Force Research Laboratory, which noted its disappointment with the Sony decision. "We will have to continue to use the systems we already have in hand," the lab told Ars, but "this will make it difficult to replace systems that break or fail. The refurbished PS3s also have the problem that when they come back from Sony, they have the firmware (gameOS) and it will not allow Other OS, which seems wrong. We are aware of class-action lawsuits against Sony for taking away this option on systems that use to have it."

A similar issue will confront academic PS3 clusters, which have sprung up in labs across the country. In 2007, a North Carolina State professor built himself a small cluster that he cobbled together after "he spent a few hours one day in early January driving from store to store to purchase the eight machines."

The University of Massachusetts has 16 machines networked into a cluster called the "Gravity Grid," used to look at gravitational waves and black holes. According to the physicists at UMass, the PS3's "incredibly low cost make it very attractive as a scientific computing node, i.e., part of a compute cluster. In fact, it's highly plausible that the raw computing power-per-dollar that the PS3 offers is significantly higher than anything else on the market today."

All such projects will last as long as the machines survive or used machines are still available, but new hardware can't be added and refurbished machines can't be used. A class-action lawsuit has recently targeted Sony for removing a promised feature retroactively, though the issue is unlikely to be decided anytime soon.

We asked Sony for comment on how its decision would affect scientific computing clusters, but received no answer before publication.
A love affair with off-the-shelf consumer hardware

Such are the dangers of relying on consumer-grade hardware sold with a very different set of concerns from those that bedevil the scientists, especially in an era where firmware updates routinely alter functionality. But the Air Force, for one, has no plans to stop.

"The gaming and graphics market continues to push the state of the art and lowers the cost of High Performance Computing, FLOPS/WATTS per dollar," the Air Force Research Laboratory told Ars. "This is important for embedded HPC, our area of expertise.

"The HPC environment is rapidly changing; leveraging technology that is subsidized by large consumer markets will always have large cost advantages. This gives us the experience (lesson learned) to develop HPC with low-cost hardware, benefitting the tax payer, Air Force, Air Force Research Lab while utilizing limited DoD budgets."
adam2046
Ah, there he is.
Arusha Shuna
now THIS is news
TKiller
well, news like this one were obvious since moment Sony said "no more Linux on PS3". Not only scientifical orhanizations bought PS3 systems for calculation processings. Won't talk for everyone but even firm my father works in bought a pair of PS3s for their Linux-based cluster and what that firm does is managing federal and regional advertising.

Heh, looks like back to good old Xeons, huh?
Azure_Kite
I guess it was fun while it lasted, and all good things come to an end.
Loginer
Why don't Sony start producing PS3s without the components necessary for gaming (GPU, Blu-Ray drive etc.) and market them as cheap GNU/Linux computers? That'd at least solve part of the problem.
TKiller

Loginer wrote:

Why don't Sony start producing PS3s without the components necessary for gaming (GPU, Blu-Ray drive etc.) and market them as cheap GNU/Linux computers? That'd at least solve part of the problem.
That won't solve any problems for SONY, this only will solve problems for those who buy PS3 for Linux reasons (and actually bring more problems for SONY).

Also, lawsuit against SONY should be mentioned, http://www.sankakucomplex.com/2010/05/0 ... -billions/

The law firm handling the case is claiming the console’s high price was due to the inclusion of Linux support, most probably in an effort to increase the size of the final settlement:

“This class definition reflects, in part, that Sony commanded a much higher price for the gaming console based on the functionality of the ‘Other OS’ feature at the time of its launch and trumpeted the ‘Other OS’ feature in its subsequent marketing.

As a result, consumers paid much more for a product than they should otherwise have been charged now that Sony has disabled the ‘Other OS’ feature.”
I find this quite retarded because PS3 systems price for customers was already lower than manufacturing costs.
Loginer

TKiller wrote:

Loginer wrote:

Why don't Sony start producing PS3s without the components necessary for gaming (GPU, Blu-Ray drive etc.) and market them as cheap GNU/Linux computers? That'd at least solve part of the problem.
That won't solve any problems for SONY, this only will solve problems for those who buy PS3 for Linux reasons (and actually bring more problems for SONY).
The reason they removed the Other OS feature in the first place is because it could be exploited to play pirated PS3 games. A PS3 that can't play games by design would solve that problem. As for making money, the manufacturing cost of a PS3 is far lower than that of most computers used in clusters, so they'd still be attractive if they were sold at profit (which they already are, IIRC).
Rokodo
Why would a company such as SONY continue producing consoles at a loss anyway? I doubt SONY would even be content with breaking even at this stage in the PS3's life cycle.
Having said that, we should look back at the original Mini...

...the Mini generated a very slim profit for BMC at the start because it was sold at 'very near cost' to keep it cheap
http://ca.autos.yahoo.com/p/1451/ten-th ... about-mini
Cuddlebun
NachoPiggy should start publishing his own newspaper

The Nacho Times
Azure_Kite

Todesengal wrote:

NachoPiggy should start publishing his own newspaper

The Nacho Times
YES
NoHitter

Todesengal wrote:

The Nacho Times
Why not?
Zekira
The Nacho Times
Support
Loginer
I'd definitely read that feed.
Azure_Kite
^
LuigiHann

Loginer wrote:

Why don't Sony start producing PS3s without the components necessary for gaming (GPU, Blu-Ray drive etc.) and market them as cheap GNU/Linux computers? That'd at least solve part of the problem.
Games are their only source of profit on the entire PlayStation brand. If people aren't buying games, Sony is losing money by selling the systems...
TKiller

LuigiHann wrote:

Loginer wrote:

Why don't Sony start producing PS3s without the components necessary for gaming (GPU, Blu-Ray drive etc.) and market them as cheap GNU/Linux computers? That'd at least solve part of the problem.
Games are their only source of profit on the entire PlayStation brand. If people aren't buying games, Sony is losing money by selling the systems...
Exactly.
Loginer

LuigiHann wrote:

Loginer wrote:

Why don't Sony start producing PS3s without the components necessary for gaming (GPU, Blu-Ray drive etc.) and market them as cheap GNU/Linux computers? That'd at least solve part of the problem.
Games are their only source of profit on the entire PlayStation brand. If people aren't buying games, Sony is losing money by selling the systems...

TKiller wrote:

LuigiHann wrote:

Games are their only source of profit on the entire PlayStation brand. If people aren't buying games, Sony is losing money by selling the systems...
Exactly.
Read my second post.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply