Am I the only one that feels this way?
and IMO that's what made this thread useful. The OP was far more useless than anything else discussed in the thread, having made a statement with no justification behind it.Beuchi-chan wrote:
I've seen so many protobubbled maps that have a lot of mod posts after the protobubble post... Imo this is what makes MATs useless.
EEeee wrote:
hehehe, I <3 Modding, and i'm no MAT, wouldn't need it to do what i need to do
This is how you start discussions/troll.awp wrote:
The OP was far more useless than anything else discussed in the thread, having made a statement with no justification behind it.
Fixed.JarJarJacob wrote:
This is how you troll.awp wrote:
The OP was far more useless than anything else discussed in the thread, having made a statement with no justification behind it.
Or I could provoke a response in a thread by forcing a direct message. At the moment, I really don't know what to think about the MAT. I'm seeing what the community has to say and that, I thought, was the best way of doing it.Mogsworth wrote:
If you want to start a discussion, actually have some fucking justification behind it in the OP.
Since MAT is something between mapper and BAT, don't expect perfect results. If you find a pubble that should be popped, just mod it and bubble it later, it's a proto-bubble after all. Too many guys are popping pubbles but don't take care of the map afterwards.ztrot wrote:
sometimes it takes a troll's message to get others to really talk about what needs to be done.
I mean WTF is the MAT. It really doesn't do anything, it's just a Gaint subfourm of meaningless waste, most of the pubbles I have looked at are to be popped and it's like they give them out like stars.
Well, at the end of the day, it worked.JarJarJacob wrote:
I'm seeing what the community has to say and that, I thought, was the best way of doing it.
most likely because the map is no where near bubble standardsDangaard wrote:
Since MAT is something between mapper and BAT, don't expect perfect results. If you find a pubble that should be popped, just mod it and bubble it later, it's a proto-bubble after all. Too many guys are popping pubbles but don't take care of the map afterwards.ztrot wrote:
sometimes it takes a troll's message to get others to really talk about what needs to be done.
I mean WTF is the MAT. It really doesn't do anything, it's just a Gaint subfourm of meaningless waste, most of the pubbles I have looked at are to be popped and it's like they give them out like stars.
This.Derekku Chan wrote:
Beuchi and 0_o pretty much summed up my opinion on this matter: There are too many MATs that are pubbling non-bubble-worthy maps; There is no visual impact for normal users.
I agree that it's very ambiguous. I propose a change to the team name.JarJarJacob wrote:
I wasn't aware that the MAT were supposed to help people like that and I haven't seen other people approach them simply because they are MATs. Perhaps that should be made more clear somehow?
I'd say the main thing is that "MATs can give potential bubbles" but obviously that's where the problem lies.JarJarJacob wrote:
there's really nothing that the MAT does in that way that regular users don't.
They help me a lot. I can't expect any help from BATs without a pubble ;_; Unless the map is good, but it happens rarelyJarJarJacob wrote:
Am I the only one that feels this way?
awp wrote:
They're for assisting mappers, not for speeding up the ranking of a map.
So that means modders don't assist mappers?Zekira wrote:
awp wrote:
They're for assisting mappers, not for speeding up the ranking of a map.
Zekira wrote:
awp wrote:
They're for assisting mappers, not for speeding up the ranking of a map.
I really agree with this, as the name implies MAT (Mapping Assistance Team) They are experienced modder that assist mapper with their map0_o wrote:
I think the concept behind the MAT team is good: an experienced modder (MAT) gives map proto-bubbles to show the BAT team that someone who knows what they are talking about deems the map as quality. This in theory would make the BAT's lives easier since they would be able to focus on maps that have already passed through a quality assurance check, which means less modding and more bubbles/ranks.
If the name change to Quality Assurance Team won't that mean they really have to be more carefull with giving pubble0_o wrote:
Personall I think the Quality Assurance Team (QAT) would be more accurate than Mapping Assistance.
I think that something like this needs to be put into place to eliminate the excessive pubbling...Gens wrote:
Wasn't there any kind of penalty for MATs when a pubble is popped?
If this were to happen, it should only happen when something serious is missed. Pubbles are popped for trivial reasons all the time.Derekku Chan wrote:
I think that something like this needs to be put into place to eliminate the excessive pubbling...Gens wrote:
Wasn't there any kind of penalty for MATs when a pubble is popped?
I don't know how much difference a name change would make in reality, but even if it did have some subconscious influence, being more careful is a good thing, right?Sallad4ever wrote:
If the name change to Quality Assurance Team won't that mean they really have to be more carefull with giving pubble0_o wrote:
Personall I think the Quality Assurance Team (QAT) would be more accurate than Mapping Assistance.
I could be wrong here, but I'm pretty sure that in the introduction page for them, their purpose was to speed up and refine the process of ranking. If I'm wrong, then ignore me.awp wrote:
They're for assisting mappers, not for speeding up the ranking of a map.
Just like 0_o said in his last post, CDFA0_o wrote:
If this were to happen, it should only happen when something serious is missed. Pubbles are popped for trivial reasons all the time.
Please, tell me where you drew the conclusion "Because A, not B." Because the MAT are something, nowhere is it stated or implied that anything else isn't.Blue Dragon wrote:
So that means modders don't assist mappers?awp wrote:
They're for assisting mappers, not for speeding up the ranking of a map.
You can't blame the ineffectiveness of the MAT soley on the people in it. Most of us are actually very capable of the position; several are even BAT worthy. Sure there may be a few "weak links", but honestly, the reason why the system isn't working is because of the lousiness of the current makeshift pubble system. The fact that the active MAT brutally outnumber the active BAT right now doesn't help either - our not-so-useful pubbles are piling up faster than BATs can look at them (and not all of them do).Pasonia wrote:
The whole idea didn't flow because those in the MAT position are either not capable, or cannot be bothered to enforce the standards that they are expected to enforce.