forum

what rank is considered 'good'

posted
Total Posts
90
show more
B1rd

silmarilen wrote:

i personally think top10k is pretty good already
now I have a goal so senpai will finally notice me

silmarilen wrote:

yeah and once you get to top3k you will still say you're not good.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
yeah, if you can fc like 80% of them you're not bad. But if you can do that, that's probably at least 3.5K pp.
VoidnOwO
Top 2,5k ppv1 :^)
Almost
Nah, top 100 ppv1 is where it's at.
cheezstik

silmarilen wrote:

yeah and once you get to top3k you will still say you're not good.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
My best right now is actually 5.03 star no-mod with 98% acc (huehue brag more) but regardless, I wasn't being completely serious anyway. Ofc everyone has a different definition of 'good'.
timemon
I would consider people who have 3,306 pp or higher "good".



pls dont hurt me
Arnold0
Definitely more than 10k as I'm 10k and I still think I'm realy bad :lel:
I'd say something like being able to play AR8+DT and FC with good accuracy or something like that, rank is sometimes not realy a good indicator.
41236
.
Yano
Sub Rank 500

Overall ppl who can read AR5-AR10.3 and can play HR and DT.

A good example is WubWoofWolf

"Good" is above "average".

In my eyes:
A average person can pass AR 8,9,10 Maps and maybe FC 1/4 of these.

A good person can FC more than 7/8 AR 8,9,10 Ranked Maps


Just my opinion.
Rio-
I'd consider Top 3k are good.
Varetyr
Can't agree more with silm here, you guys either have extremely low self esteem or don't bother watching what's happening around you because if you're ~10k, you're probably far above the REAL "average" players, therefore "good" already.
chainpullz
Rank 0. If you haven't broken down the barrier of natural numbers with your sheer awesomeness then you don't deserve the title "good." You can settle on the title "not as bad as some people" if you would like though.
GoldenWolf
Saturos shall never be forgotten
- Marco -
Probably 10k :)
chainpullz

GoldenWolf wrote:

Saturos shall never be forgotten
Or WWW if I'm remembering correctly.
Karuta-_old_1

Varetyr wrote:

Can't agree more with silm here, you guys either have extremely low self esteem or don't bother watching what's happening around you because if you're ~10k, you're probably far above the REAL "average" players, therefore "good" already.
I think I am good but I need to be"better"
kevpwns
IMO hard to judge with rank, some people at 2k are worse than 10k players (like me :^)). I would say top 100 is good, all subjective
Vuelo Eluko
around ~500 and up

But personally I think anyone above 5kpp deserves to call themselves good too
winber1

Riince wrote:

But personally I think anyone above 5kpp deserves to call themselves good too
ahaha that's a funny joke

can you tell it again
-JaZe-
Good is just a bit better than you

Vuelo Eluko

winber1 wrote:

Riince wrote:

But personally I think anyone above 5kpp deserves to call themselves good too
ahaha that's a funny joke

can you tell it again
just going off my tons of spectating of hundreds of different people good and bad
jasian
I say 4k+ pp is 'good'.
pooptartsonas
Anyone better than me. It's a dynamic skill metric!
Jahnsin
In my opinion I think 42069 PP is considered good
[CSGA]Ar3sgice
1
tecu
Anyone better than myself.
Xayne
This thread taught me that no one wants to admit they are good. "Good" is just above "Average". There are over a million ranked players. Based on that, I'd say the top 10 or even top 5% could easily say they are "Good". That's the top 100k and 50k respectively. "Good" does not mean "Great".
jesse1412
At least 7k pp. 8k is when you're certainly good.
silmarilen
lewa says he's bad, so 8k isnt good enough.
I Give Up

Xayne wrote:

There are over a million ranked players.
But only like 1/4 actually still play from time and time, and only those above #100k are casual/regular players. It's not a huge player base.
Xayne

KukiMonster wrote:

Xayne wrote:

There are over a million ranked players.
But only like 1/4 actually still play from time and time, and only those above #100k are casual/regular players. It's not a huge player base.
That's oddly depressing to read.
silmarilen
there are about 700-800k people with at least 1pp. this means they have played in the past 3 months. given that a lot of them are just people who tried out the game once and didnt enjoy it, or people who quit. you can safely assume that there are no more than 500k active people, possibly even less.
even then being in the top10k is a massive feat.
especially considering there are people who have been playing for a while (over a year) and still havent managed to get into top10k
-Soba-

KukiMonster wrote:

Xayne wrote:

There are over a million ranked players.
But only like 1/4 actually still play from time and time, and only those above #100k are casual/regular players. It's not a huge player base.
Why do you get to decide the line for who is casual/regular
In Vitro
Top 1000 is what I consider good. Because let's be real, if you're average at games and give osu a bit of effort you will easily break 10k.

Then the average players stall between ~2-4k since time invested in the game effectively translates to pp/rank gain until somewhere around this level. Until talent/skill decides who moves on. If good is considered above average, then above average (including players actually trying) should be around sub 1k.


Of course these are just my opinions.
chainpullz

Kayneighn wrote:

Top 1000 is what I consider good. Because let's be real, if you're average at games and give osu a bit of effort you will easily break 10k.

Then the average players stall between ~2-4k since time invested in the game effectively translates to pp/rank gain until somewhere around this level. Until talent/skill decides who moves on. If good is considered above average, then above average (including players actually trying) should be around sub 1k.


Of course these are just my opinions.
I don't think you have a different definition of average than the formal definition. Most players of games are shitty casual players thus the skill level of the average player is that of a shitty casual player. You just don't interact with shitty casuals enough to realize just how many of them there actually are. Osu! is no different in this respect. You will probably never interact with many players below like rank 40k unless you actively seek them out. The equivalent of top 20k (which is probably about top 10%) is the wedge of people you would consider make up all of the players in the games and thus you are finding that the average player in these games is the equivalent of top 10k here. So yes, if you ignore the vast majority of most games' player base this statement is true.
cheezstik

silmarilen wrote:

there are about 700-800k people with at least 1pp.
This is a pretty interesting fact, shows how many people have basically just given up before really even starting to play the game, which seems to be way more than people who actually actively play the game. I started at rank 2.6M 8 months ago with <1 PP (Decimal), so that means there are now probably more than 2M+ people ranked with 0.X PP, and a slightly lesser amount with only 1 PP.
xasuma
#10 000 and less is good . But that is it though, just "good" .
Almost

Kayneighn wrote:

Top 1000 is what I consider good. Because let's be real, if you're average at games and give osu a bit of effort you will easily break 10k.

Then the average players stall between ~2-4k since time invested in the game effectively translates to pp/rank gain until somewhere around this level. Until talent/skill decides who moves on. If good is considered above average, then above average (including players actually trying) should be around sub 1k.


Of course these are just my opinions.
I think if anyone bothered trying, top 1k is pretty easy as well. You don't even need to have talent.
gregest
rank 0
winber1
if i am basically the only mentally retarded semi-troll on this subforum it means we don't have enough active players

fact
silmarilen

cheezstik wrote:

silmarilen wrote:

there are about 700-800k people with at least 1pp.
This is a pretty interesting fact, shows how many people have basically just given up before really even starting to play the game, which seems to be way more than people who actually actively play the game. I started at rank 2.6M 8 months ago with <1 PP (Decimal), so that means there are now probably more than 2M+ people ranked with 0.X PP, and a slightly lesser amount with only 1 PP.
you forgot the part where not playing for 3 months also sets your pp to 0 until you play again
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply