forum

what rank is considered 'good'

posted
Total Posts
90
Topic Starter
daikichi
a while back when i was grinding to 2000 pp, I remember someone saying that 2000pp wasn't hard to achieve and it was 'casual' ( i myself thought that 2000pp would be quite a feat). that made me question what isn't 'casual' and what is considered good.

what rank/pp do you think is considered 'good',̶ ̶a̶n̶d̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶ ̶c̶a̶s̶u̶a̶l̶?

i'd say 3000pp :o
xxdeathx
it's all relative..
nrl
"Casual" isn't a descriptor for rank quality, it's a descriptor for time investment. Any person of any rank can be "casual."
Karuta-_old_1
when your rank is lower than your pp
Topic Starter
daikichi

[MY] yummy90 XP wrote:

when your rank is lower than your pp
interesting way to put it!

makes sense.
B1rd
3000 isn't good. maybe 4000.
theramdans
rank doesnt fully represent your actual skill
Gumpy
Well it get's lower everyday since more and more people rank up.
winber1
8k pp
GoldenWolf

Narrill wrote:

"Casual" isn't a descriptor for rank quality, it's a descriptor for time investment. Any person of any rank can be "casual."
You could even say the actual #1 is casual since he doesn't even play that much
PLAYER WITH RSI
imo under 1k
I Give Up
#171,354 and under.
Noffy
A player being casual or having a good rank are two separate things. A player with a great rank may barely touch the game, and vice versa where somebody can play constantly but not necessarily consider themselves good. What ranks are considered good depends on each player's view. When you're rank 300k, 100k seems incredible, when rank 150k, 70k seems impossible and so on. At the same time to call people of any rank a bad player isn't very true because that would imply that their ability to improve is already locked... In a game like osu! it becomes very difficult to classify anybody as "good" or "bad" because of the wide range of difficulties and high number of players. Really it just depends on one's own view as to whether they are good or others are good or bad.
Rewben2
#1
silmarilen
i personally think top10k is pretty good already
Synpoo
ya top 10k is pretty dece
cheezstik
Top 10k checking in, can confirm not good. Maybe top 2-3k.
silmarilen
yeah and once you get to top3k you will still say you're not good.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
B1rd

silmarilen wrote:

i personally think top10k is pretty good already
now I have a goal so senpai will finally notice me

silmarilen wrote:

yeah and once you get to top3k you will still say you're not good.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
yeah, if you can fc like 80% of them you're not bad. But if you can do that, that's probably at least 3.5K pp.
VoidnOwO
Top 2,5k ppv1 :^)
Almost
Nah, top 100 ppv1 is where it's at.
cheezstik

silmarilen wrote:

yeah and once you get to top3k you will still say you're not good.
if you can fc 4.5+ star maps with like 98% accuracy then you're pretty good already.
My best right now is actually 5.03 star no-mod with 98% acc (huehue brag more) but regardless, I wasn't being completely serious anyway. Ofc everyone has a different definition of 'good'.
timemon
I would consider people who have 3,306 pp or higher "good".



pls dont hurt me
Arnold0
Definitely more than 10k as I'm 10k and I still think I'm realy bad :lel:
I'd say something like being able to play AR8+DT and FC with good accuracy or something like that, rank is sometimes not realy a good indicator.
41236
.
Yano
Sub Rank 500

Overall ppl who can read AR5-AR10.3 and can play HR and DT.

A good example is WubWoofWolf

"Good" is above "average".

In my eyes:
A average person can pass AR 8,9,10 Maps and maybe FC 1/4 of these.

A good person can FC more than 7/8 AR 8,9,10 Ranked Maps


Just my opinion.
Rio-
I'd consider Top 3k are good.
Varetyr
Can't agree more with silm here, you guys either have extremely low self esteem or don't bother watching what's happening around you because if you're ~10k, you're probably far above the REAL "average" players, therefore "good" already.
chainpullz
Rank 0. If you haven't broken down the barrier of natural numbers with your sheer awesomeness then you don't deserve the title "good." You can settle on the title "not as bad as some people" if you would like though.
GoldenWolf
Saturos shall never be forgotten
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply