request ~
Good luck with this map! Love the CTB~
[Easy]
Maybe AR8 would be a better choice for this hard? it feels like it could use a bit more speed especially with some of the 1/2s, and also could help reading on stuff like 00:01:102 (2,3,4,5,6) - .
- 00:10:936 (2) - I think this rhythm feels a bit awkward, and so does the spacing a bit. how about move this slider 1/2 earlier for better polarity? and you'd extend it, obviously
- 00:31:268 (4) - remove finish from tail?; or, add finish to the head of the next slider
- 00:35:935 (1) - highly recommend shortening this slider by 1/2, because beginners are going to let go early due to expecting a different rhythm than what you have here
- 00:42:936 (2) - remove finish? i don't feel much of an accent here
- 00:51:269 (1) - add whistle to head; and i'd also recommend doing that to every 8/1 beats
- 01:20:602 (1,2) - this also feels weird, since first it gives more impact to click on 01:21:602 - instead of 01:22:102 - because there's actually something in the music to denote it. I think something like this could be a better alternative.
- 01:23:602 (2,1) - add NC to (2) and remove it from the next circle, (1). it helps identify this as a triangle pattern, and would look nicer with the followpoints
- 01:27:268 (1) - whistle instead of finish? its a very soft note, and finish is too strong for it imo
- 00:17:602 (1,2,3) - this curve is kinda weird? even though i feel its really my own preference, i think overall it'll look more friendly with a slighter curve, like this
- 00:17:935 (3) - as mentioned before, people aren't fond of this ^.^ so yeah
- 00:23:602 (1) - change to a 1/1 slider that starts 1 beat before, so you can get the vocal beat while still feeling smoother
- 00:26:269 (1) - same here
- 00:29:936 (3) - yeah, again with the multiple reverses, but i have a nice idea which would require a bit of rearranging. here: link
- 00:31:935 (2) - and btw, this slider could be better if it curved in the same direction as (1) does: link
- 01:20:602 (2,3,4) - put finishes on the heads of each of these three sliders? sounds epic
Maybe AR8 would be a better choice for this hard? it feels like it could use a bit more speed especially with some of the 1/2s, and also could help reading on stuff like 00:01:102 (2,3,4,5,6) - .
- 00:01:019 (3) - you should remove this imo, triples that start on a white line in some cases don't feel natural and with the music, and this is one of those cases
- 00:29:935 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - it would look a bit nicer if you spread them out so that they're not touching
- 00:30:935 (1,2,3) - and btw, if you had done a change here why not just do that to the whole pattern so that they're alternating?
- 01:03:269 (2,3,4,5) - i really like this <3
- 01:08:602 (3) - you could split this into 2 reverse sliders, just so players don't get bored from holding this, or even make a small stream? https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2152280 note: i moved (3) to make a triangle
- 01:20:602 (1,2,3) - as said in normal diff, finishes on heads?
- 01:26:102 (2,3,2,3) - i think it would look nicer, flow more smoothly and be a bit more forgiving while putting on accent on the correct beats, if you make the (2,3) pairs into 1/2 sliders.
- 00:05:602 (4) - you could move this further away from (3), just to show the variance in rhythm
- 00:13:936 (7,8) - make the tail and (8) lower in volume, because you did so before
- 00:16:602 (7,8) - ^
- 00:21:602 (5,1) - add NC to (5) and remove from the slider, it would 00:21:602 (5,6,7,8,1) - one whole pattern by itself and it really should be this way, because you do so on the same beats with 00:23:936 (1,2,3,4,5) -
- 01:11:769 (3,4,1) - how about ctrl+g (3,4), then removing (1) and adding a reverse to (4)?
- 01:20:602 (1,2,3,4) - same about the finishes
Good luck with this map! Love the CTB~