forum

Merge nK.ini (osu!mania) with skin.ini

posted
Total Posts
7
This is a feature request. Feature requests can be voted up by supporters.
Current Priority: +0
Topic Starter
Factorial
For simplicity purposes on skinning

The new skin.ini would be this:
Code
[General]
//General

[Colours]
//Colors

[Font]
//Numbering

[4K]
//4 Keys

[5K]
//5 Keys

[6K]
//6 Keys

[7K]
//7 Keys

[8K]
//8 Keys
Or this (based on Fullerene-'s reply):
Code
[General]
//General

[Colours]
//Colors

[Font]
//Numbering

[Mania4K]
//4 Keys

[Mania5K]
//5 Keys

[Mania6K]
//6 Keys

[Mania7K]
//7 Keys

[Mania8K]
//8 Keys
Fullerene-
http://smgi.me/?p=170#more-170

already in the works
Yandere-P
whoa, looking forward to that..!
Topic Starter
Factorial

Fullerene- wrote:

http://smgi.me/?p=170#more-170

already in the works
But I think that repeated [Mania] lines wouuld contradict each other...
deadbeat
from what i can tell, [Mania] sections will be sectioned by nKey. can't confirm though
Topic Starter
Factorial
Well, based Fullerene-'s reply this will be the format:
[Mania]
Keys: 5

[Mania]
Keys: 6

[Mania]
Keys: 7
I think it's contradicting because it is much more like declaring 2 different commands at the same time
[General]
Name: Skin X

[General]
Name: Skin Y

[General]
Name: Skin Z
smoogipoo
[nK] headers were considered however were abandoned as a result of my new skinning system in-place internally which makes parsing skins a lot easier using the "Keys: " style. I could use regex to parse the headers however I don't really like the idea of having dynamic headers as the system might be more prone to parsing errors thereafter. This might be a consideration I'll make in the future, but don't feel it's required for the time being. I understand the advantages in terms of readability of dynamic headers.

It will also be easier to parse layouts like 5+1 in the current case - [51K] is not really a good style imo as my goals for mania extend way beyond the possibility of just 10K in terms of extensibility (not saying 51K will be a thing, but I want to have that option available ;)).

"Keys: " doesn't look too bad right? I can obviously change the name as it's still WIP.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply