I'll stick with my mom's Palm TX, thanks. Seriously, I wish I had a Palm TX, and I'd definitely use it over this... THING! Aren't there better Tablet PCs already out there anyways?
Wi-Fi comes standard. 120 extra for 3G.Loginer wrote:
(you need to pay $120 extra for Wi-Fi).
Reminds me of that old old onion video:Loginer wrote:
Apple can release anything and people will just mindlessly praise it, no matter how useless it is.
Many modern netbooks have about 7-8 hours of battery life, so 10 hours isn't that much of a stretch.Ph0X wrote:
I personally call BS on the 10hour battery life. Any laptop can run a maximum of what, 2-3 hours? No way a little thing like this with a huge monitor can run 10hours straight.
"Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Keyboard"Ph0X wrote:
Reminds me of that old old onion video:
"Apple Introduces Revolutionary New Laptop With No Keyboard"@1:35: "I'll buy almost anything that's shiny and made by apple.."
Uhh...
For sure. And I couldn't help but feel cheated if I didn't get 3G. The draw of this is portability, after all.Loginer wrote:
My bad. The prices are still ridiculous, though.
Because it's APPLEEphemeral wrote:
Oversized i-phone with an exorbitant price tag
Why does this warrant such hype again?
that is why i HATE apple productsBagnoGamer wrote:
I lol'd.
The fun is in the journey.phill wrote:
I love how worked up people get over this shit. If you don't want it, don't buy it.
fix'd ?BagnoGamer wrote:
Apple is all shit and nothing else.
Except I'm still at school and have to deal with my peers raving about this expensive paper weight.phill wrote:
I love how worked up people get over this shit. If you don't want it, don't buy it.
Actually, now that I think about it, you're right. Nice aesthetics, but horrible technical design.strager wrote:
Reminds me of the Wii.
And the jokes on the name, mostly.nardi11011 wrote:
Actually, now that I think about it, you're right. Nice aesthetics, but horrible technical design.strager wrote:
Reminds me of the Wii.
Seriously, did the person who made this use "pixelerate" on purpose or something? iPhone can run all these crazy 3d games at crazy framerates, and i don't get why osu has to be so painfully laggy and horrible looking on it. I understand porting a game isn't an easy task but still~ :<nuudles wrote:
hmmm...
http://luunatic.com/osupad.png
I did this. That's the actual osu! iPhone compiled and running on the iPad Simulator. Basically, when running in Compatibility mode, you can either run it at a small size, or you can run it where it essentially doubles all the pixels (hence why it looks so pixely). That's how it would look running directly without targeting the actual iPad.Ph0X wrote:
Seriously, did the person who made this use "pixelerate" on purpose or something? iPhone can run all these crazy 3d games at crazy framerates, and i don't get why osu has to be so painfully laggy and horrible looking on it. I understand porting a game isn't an easy task but still~ :<
Look, if they'd create device made up of poop (literally), many people would want to get it no matter what.awp wrote:
Bagno did indeed say it best:
the fact that people buy this shit - not just buy it, but rave about it, and look forward to it,and kill for it, is a testament to Apple's marketing department's capability.
I probably would have read it if it was about what I had thought it was about...0_o wrote:
i-need-to-talk-to-you-about-computers-ive-been
SHANGHAI (AFP) – The unveiling of Apple's iPad tablet computer was one of the most anticipated technology events in recent years, but a similar looking device has been on sale in China for nearly six months.
The touchscreen iPad look-alike marks a new milestone by Chinese manufacturers: cloning a product before it had even been announced, mused Shanghaiist.com, a Shanghai city blog, and Shanzhai.com, a tech blog dedicated to Chinese copies.
But Shenzhen Great Loong Brother Industrial Co. -- makers of the Chinese device, which resembles an over-sized iPhone -- said Apple appeared to be the copycats.
"We don't understand. Why did they make the same thing as us?" Huang Xiaofang, an executive at the company, told AFP.
The iPad-like "P88" was launched in August and was on show last year at the Internationale Funkausstellung consumer electronics fair in Berlin, she said.
"We launched it earlier," she said.
Although thicker and heavier than the iPad, the P88's specifications boasts a slightly larger screen, faster processor, larger memory and, unlike the iPad, has USB ports, according to the manufacturer.
But its battery life is only 1.5 hours compared to the iPad's 10 hours.
Apple's first iPads will ship worldwide at an entry-level price of 499 dollars in two months.
But for gadget fanatics who cannot wait, Huang said the P88 is available now on Great Loong Brother's web site.
TOKYO (AFP) – Apple's new tablet PC is not the first product to be called the "iPad". Japan's Fujitsu says it launched one years ago, and the name has also been used for small engines and even bra inserts.
Amid the hype about Apple's latest offering, the device has been hailed as an "iPhone on steroids" and a "Kindle killer" that will upstage electronic book readers, but also mocked on chatrooms for evoking a feminine hygiene product.
Now it looks like Apple could have a trademark dispute on its hands.
Fujitsu Ltd. said its US subsidiary in 2002 launched the "iPad", a sleek handheld multimedia device with a 3.5-inch screen, used by retail store clerks to keep inventory data, scan barcodes and manage business operations.
Fujitsu's device has an Intel processor and a Microsoft operating system and supports both Wi-fi and Bluetooth connections.
In 2003, Fujitsu's US arm made a trademark application for the "iPad" name with the US Patent and Trademark Office, which is still pending and not yet registered, said Fujitsu spokesman Masao Sakamoto in Tokyo.
He said Fujitsu was yet to decide on how it may react to the launch of Apple's tablet computer, saying: "As we are now sorting out the facts, we have not decided on what action we may take."
A possible feud between Apple and Fujitsu has sparked debate on Japanese chatrooms, with one observer proposing: "Let's apply for as many 'i' such-and-such names as possible! We'll make money in the future!!"
Apple has been embroiled in trademark disputes with other companies before, including Cisco Systems, which launched its "iPhone" before Apple. The two companies settled the dispute in 2007, agreeing to share the name.
Professor Teruyuki Inoue, an IT sector expert at Daito Bunka University, said the "iPad" issue is unlikely to turn into a full-blown legal battle.
"They will probably have talks to settle this, given that the customers for their products do not overlap, and for the sake of their business ties in the future," Inoue told AFP by telephone.
He said he was not surprised the two companies had doubled up on the name, saying: "Everybody can think of an easy name like 'iPad.' It's not creative."
Indeed several other companies worldwide have had the same idea.
Germany's Siemens uses the trademark "iPad" for small engines and motors.
The Swiss-based microchip maker STMicroelectronics has reportedly also registered "IPAD", short for "Integrated Passive and Active Devices."
In Canada, the Ontario-based company Coconut Grove Pads Inc. has since 2007 made a line of bra inserts and shoulder pads called the "iPad", according to an online report by the Globe and Mail daily.
A Japanese company that makes a product of the same name -- pronounced "ai pad" when transcribed from the Japanese -- is Awaji-Tec, a manufacturer of adult nappies with a high-tech twist.
The company says its nappies feature an electronic device that can send a signal to a remote caregiver when it needs to be changed.
"We have been selling this elderly care product for the past five years, said Yasuaki Mori, who works at Awaji-Tec's special sensors division. "It would be regrettable if people thought we had copied the name."
Meanwhile in China, a company has used a different name -- the "P88" -- for an iPad look-alike, with a slightly larger screen, faster processor and larger memory but battery life of only 1.5 hours compared to the iPad's 10 hours.
It marks a new milestone by Chinese manufacturers -- cloning a product before it had even been announced -- mused Shanghaiist.com, a Shanghai city blog, and Shanzhai.com, a tech blog dedicated to Chinese copies.
But the makers of the P88, Shenzhen Great Loong Brother Industrial Co., said Apple appeared to be the copycats.
"We don't understand. Why did they make the same thing as us?" Huang Xiaofang, an executive at the company, told AFP. "We launched it earlier."