DakeDekaane reveals a gun and shoots NoHitter!DakeDekaane wrote:
Shoot: NH
If there is any mistakes please inform me.Setsuen wrote:
Setsuen wrote:
Votecount 1.2
With 9Alive, it takes 5 to lynch
StaticNoiseBird[0]
CalignoBot[1]-StaticNoiseBird
NoHitter[1]-BRBP
BRBP[1]-CalignoBot
Gumica[1]-Drezi
rEdo[0]
fartownik[1]-NoHitter
DakeDekaane[0]
Drezi[1]-rEdo
Not voting:,fartownik,DakeDekaane,Gumica
Damn, way too many good things happen to scum...Setsuen wrote:
The mod decides to revive DD because this set-up is apparently scum-sided.
I don't always suggest something stupid. I'm just normally opposed to the status quo way of doing this thing.BRBP wrote:
Still waiting for NH to suggest something stupid like a massclaim.
C'mon man, it's been 15 hours already, I know you want to.I can't sleep unless I get to know whether I was already caught by CB or if he's still in RVS.
lol wut.fartownik wrote:
The mod just scumslipped GG no re
no. I'm pretty sure sample PM said to PM me about the shot. <.<fartownik wrote:
@mod: if the Mafia Vigilante posts his kill action in the thread instead of PM, would it still work?
BRBP wrote:
Requesting mod to prod drezi, SNB and gumica.
:^)
NH gets scumpoints for setting up for my eventual future death from the DayvigNoHitter wrote:
Oh farto gets town points for that question.
No, I'm pretty sure I'm not leaving home for the next several days.BRBP wrote:
Gumica wrote:
Being this punctual on prods this early on? what are you? Alien v2 (reffering to last newbie), who wins by prodding others?
jkjk. Anyways, sorry for not responding within 24h, I was working at a job, so I didn't had any time avaliable for forum. :^)Thanks for contributing, see you again in 24 hours...Static Noise Bird wrote:
Sorry, was gone for some time, and didn't have time to check this particular thread yet. But I'm here now.
They have Day chat for Day1 only.BRBP wrote:
Does scum have daychat?
Can doc target the same person every night?
Can doc target himself?
If there is any mistakes please inform me.Setsuen wrote:
Vote Count 1.4
With 9Alive, it takes 5 to lynch
StaticNoiseBird[0]
CalignoBot[1]-StaticNoiseBird
NoHitter[1]-BRBP
BRBP[1]-CalignoBot
Gumica[1]-Drezi
rEdo[1]-DakeDekaane
fartownik[1]-NoHitter
DakeDekaane[1]-rEdo
Drezi[0]
Not voting:,fartownik,Gumica
next time I host another game, it might be 10P with 7towns,2mafia & 1alien who wins by probing/prodding everyone who's alive.BRBP wrote:
Thanks for contributing, see you again in 24 hours...
Scum vibes.DakeDekaane wrote:
Shoot: NH
Town vibes.rEdo wrote:
Unvote
Vote: DakeDekaaneDamn, way too many good things happen to scum...Setsuen wrote:
The mod decides to revive DD because this set-up is apparently scum-sided.
I'm not liking this post. The way his thoughts travel from sentence to sentence looks off.NoHitter wrote:
I don't always suggest something stupid. I'm just normally opposed to the status quo way of doing this thing.BRBP wrote:
Still waiting for NH to suggest something stupid like a massclaim.
C'mon man, it's been 15 hours already, I know you want to.I can't sleep unless I get to know whether I was already caught by CB or if he's still in RVS.
Still finding a way to see if we can rig the setup for a town win though.
I don't really agree, but this is town thinking. BRBP's post after this one is making me wary, though.BRBP wrote:
fartownik wrote:
@mod: if the Mafia Vigilante posts his kill action in the thread instead of PM, would it still work?Are you saying you didn't think of that question immediately when DD said "shoot: NH"?NoHitter wrote:
Oh farto gets town points for that question.
Whether the vig shot actually works or not when posted in thread makes no difference, you can't "test" it in any way since the real scum could just submit their action via PM, or even cancel it if the person being tested happens to be the scum vig.
Stop giving your scumbuddy town points
Explain yourself here.DakeDekaane wrote:
It'd be too stupid to post action in thread being a Mafia Dayvig, at least I'm happy we have smart scum between us.
Explain yourself here too.DakeDekaane wrote:
also big FoS on rEdo
Town posting.Drezi wrote:
@BRBP: farto and NH being scums together might be a bit far fetched, actually NH looks more like town to me, connecting himself to his scum buddy at this point already wouldn't make much sense imo.
@Dake: yeah that would be the natural deduction, not sure why you'd go ahead to state it explicitly in that case.
This looks too reserved to me. Not liking it.DakeDekaane wrote:
not sure if farto is still trolling or claiming for sure
Role fishing. Scummy.BRBP wrote:
I really can't see why real BP would spontaneously claim it D1 when nobody has any real town-reads on him. I can see why scum or non-VT town would claim it, though.
Would you like to explain that claim farto?
I'm still a complete newbie, so I guess I hadn't seen enough previously. Doesn't change the fact, that this really is the first time I see one, and you guessed it blindly.BRBP wrote:
I had daychat in most of the games I played as scum.Static Noise Bird wrote:
Oh and also, not sure why would BRBP ask about scum daychat, as if he knew about it, now that it exists. I don't think that's a common theme in mafia games, thus that's rather suspicious.
Who are you leaning on for scum atm.Drezi wrote:
I dont buy that logic for suspecting rEdo either.
I'm leaning towards BRBP town for now, since this pro-town behavior would be hard to keep up as scum in the long run.
Get used to that. It ain't anywhere different from any other games I played.BRBP wrote:
How is it any different from gumica (who I constantly see in "users browsing this forum")?DakeDekaane wrote:
rEdo is scum for the mere fact of taking advantage of the mod "scumslip" to put a vote there, also for being a lurksack.
NH and farto - all im seeing is some reaction testing, trolling around basically, yet one is null-scum, the other is null-town? pretty big contrast based on what we've seen so far.CalignoBot wrote:
List of Players:
3.NoHitter --- Null-Scum
4.BRBP --- Null-Scum
6.rEdo --- Null-Town
7.fartownik --- Null-Town
8.DakeDekaane --- Scum
Check rEdo's reaction when voted.CalignoBot wrote:
What makes rEdo's lurking worse than anyone else's lurking?
Maybe it's by the things you post, perhaps? "Scumslipping" for lols and such, you know.DakeDekaane wrote:
I always find funny how everyone scumread me in the start of a game.
Scum slip when mod is WIFOM master who no one knows whether he is WIFOMing or not. #pro.DakeDekaane wrote:
rEdo is scum for the mere fact of taking advantage of the mod "scumslip" to put a vote there, also for being a lurksack.
If there is any mistakes please inform me.Setsuen wrote:
Vote Count 1.5
With 9Alive, it takes 5 to lynch
StaticNoiseBird[0]
CalignoBot[1]-StaticNoiseBird
NoHitter[1]-BRBP
BRBP[1]-CalignoBot
Gumica[0]
rEdo[2]-DakeDekaane,Drezi
fartownik[1]-NoHitter
DakeDekaane[1]-rEdo
Drezi[0]
Not voting:,fartownik,Gumica
It wasn't a stupid question. If the mod agreed on that one, we'd have Dake 50% confirmed as Town. It was worth a shot, really.Static Noise Bird wrote:
fartownik - Suspicious claim (not referring to the mafia one btw) and a stupid damn question. Would suspect for both reasons.
Pretty nice, exactly my thoughts. Seems odd that BRBP didn't manage to think that through.rEdo wrote:
farto's claim is obviously just to create WIFOM, I don't even know why BRBP tries to fish a role from him.
On the contrary. Having content from every single player in the game early is the single best way to start the game off. It doesn't matter if your only views up to that point are pulled from your ass, as it's still content that can be responded to and added upon.Drezi wrote:
You.
1) That question
Feels forced is all, I see no reason for town to hurry my views based on what we have so far.
:^)Drezi wrote:
2) Your contribution looks pretty constructive at first sight, ends up being rather vague upon further inspection.
These points:Being vague is actually generally how I play this game. I'm attempting to lessen this in order to be less of a frustrating person to play with, but I still maintain that restricting certain info can result in more information later than otherwise.CalignoBot wrote:
List of Players:
3.NoHitter --- Null-Scum
4.BRBP --- Null-Scum
6.rEdo --- Null-Town
7.fartownik --- Null-Town
8.DakeDekaane --- ScumThe NoHitter point was explained in the post directly above it. The fartownik null-town read was gut.Drezi wrote:
NH and farto - all im seeing is some reaction testing, trolling around basically, yet one is null-scum, the other is null-town? pretty big contrast based on what we've seen so far.The role fishing post and the other post that gave me pause about him is enough to overturn the positive point in his favor.Drezi wrote:
]BRBP - his first quote you say is town thinking, but becomes null-scum right after that because of role fishing, this ends up being ambiguous in the end any way I look at it, why not offer a straight opinion right away?Explain.Drezi wrote:
rEdo - town vibes you say, well what you quoted is 100% neutral I'd say.Drezi wrote:
DD - scumcall outright just yet is too harsh in my eyes.
On the contrary. Having content from every single player in the game early is the single best way to start the game off. It doesn't matter if your only views up to that point are pulled from your ass, as it's still content that can be responded to and added upon.Drezi wrote:
You.
1) That question
Feels forced is all, I see no reason for town to hurry my views based on what we have so far.
Being vague is actually generally how I play this game. I'm attempting to lessen this in order to be less of a frustrating person to play with, but I still maintain that restricting certain info can result in more information later than otherwise.Drezi wrote:
2) Your contribution looks pretty constructive at first sight, ends up being rather vague upon further inspection.
These points:CalignoBot wrote:
List of Players:
3.NoHitter --- Null-Scum
4.BRBP --- Null-Scum
6.rEdo --- Null-Town
7.fartownik --- Null-Town
8.DakeDekaane --- Scum
The NoHitter point was explained in the post directly above it. The fartownik null-town read was gut.Drezi wrote:
NH and farto - all im seeing is some reaction testing, trolling around basically, yet one is null-scum, the other is null-town? pretty big contrast based on what we've seen so far.
The role fishing post and the other post that gave me pause about him is enough to overturn the positive point in his favor.Drezi wrote:
]BRBP - his first quote you say is town thinking, but becomes null-scum right after that because of role fishing, this ends up being ambiguous in the end any way I look at it, why not offer a straight opinion right away?
Explain.Drezi wrote:
rEdo - town vibes you say, well what you quoted is 100% neutral I'd say.
[/quote]Drezi wrote:
DD - scumcall outright just yet is too harsh in my eyes.
I don't slip during reactions. Heck how would ANYONE even know if I slipped when I can WIFOM everything?rEdo wrote:
Also, if you guys really want to base your reads on mod's reactions, then... I actually feel sorry for you >_>" My vote was just to see how DD reacts, and here I am happy with my vote.
If there is any mistakes please inform me.Setsuen wrote:
Vote Count 1.6
With 9Alive, it takes 5 to lynch
StaticNoiseBird[0]
CalignoBot[0]
NoHitter[2]-BRBP,CalignoBot
BRBP[0]
Gumica[0]
rEdo[L-2]-DakeDekaane,Drezi,NoHitter
fartownik[0]
DakeDekaane[1]-rEdo
Drezi[0]
Not voting:StaticNoiseBird,fartownik,Gumica
Explain this.NoHitter wrote:
@brbp
Why go for a lurker lynch when there are clearly more suspicious people ATM?
Unvote: DakeDekaaneNoHitter wrote:
Redo's answer to dake's remarks is even more interesting. They bear a bit of straw grasping a bit, and instead of directly commenting, goes to attack Dake in a "you did something more suspicious" tone.
updated.Static Noise Bird wrote:
@Setsuen: I'm pretty sure I had unvoted CalignoBot earlier.
>36h ago; You're implying you are in favour of rEdoDrezi wrote:
I dont buy that logic for suspecting rEdo either.
>34h ago; still being in favour of rEdoDrezi wrote:
rEdo - town vibes you say, well what you quoted is 100% neutral I'd say.
>33h; You see, here you switched from CB (your biggest scumread) to rEdo (your townread).Drezi wrote:
Actually, let's do this - I'm okay with flipping rEdo, since hes the most controversial person right now (CB and BRBP defending kinda, DD strongly accusing him).
Unvote: Gumica
Vote: rEdo
it was just an RVS vote, a bad reason for a scumread, my read is not automatically the opposite - it's nullDrezi wrote:
I dont buy that logic for suspecting rEdo either.
i'm dismissing an unjustified TOWN read here - still null for me as can be seen in the comment exactly.Drezi wrote:
rEdo - town vibes you say, well what you quoted is 100% neutral I'd say.
(also rEdo)CalignoBot wrote:
Unvote: DakeDekaaneNoHitter wrote:
Redo's answer to dake's remarks is even more interesting. They bear a bit of straw grasping a bit, and instead of directly commenting, goes to attack Dake in a "you did something more suspicious" tone.
Vote: NoHitter
Dake's first reason for voting rEdo was the single most straw-grasping thing in the entire thread thus far and the second reason applies to half of the playerlist.
This entire set of reasoning gives me an entirely bad feeling all around. He's not trying to find scum with this. He's trying to twist a situation to make it look like he is.
Deadline is in 49hr 40min from this post.BRBP wrote:
Mod when is the deadline?
If there is any mistakes, please inform me.Setsuen wrote:
Vote Count 1.7
With 9Alive, it takes 5 to lynch
StaticNoiseBird[0]
CalignoBot[0]
NoHitter[1]CalignoBot
BRBP[0]
Gumica[0]
rEdo[L-2]-DakeDekaane,Drezi,NoHitter
fartownik[0]
DakeDekaane[1]-rEdo
Drezi[1]-Gumica
Not voting:StaticNoiseBird,fartownik,BRBP
And this is everything you've got to say?NoHitter wrote:
I'm voting rEdo because of how he replied and reacted to Dake.
Except that justification doesn't really work with the context of what actually happened. The scenario I posted before shows that Dake's attack was ridiculously weak, and rEdo had already voted for Dake before that point. I don't understand at all how responding by attacking is grasping at straws or not directly commenting on the attack on him itself is scummy in this situation.NoHitter wrote:
(also rEdo)
I think you're the one twisting my words here.
I'm voting rEdo because of how he replied and reacted to Dake.
Who are you even talking to?Static Noise Bird wrote:
While on the other hand, changing opinions by looking at the game more properly shouldn't be considered a scummy move, Drezi was an improbable scum (while being a probable one for the sheer fact that they played as a "town" well), and now they are just being murky, mainly for changing their opinions. When doing so, don't be so damn mysterious and try to steer away from the fact that you are not willing to explain things properly, if you want to be taken seriously - justify your suspicions and reasonings et cetera. Is CB your scumpartner, perhaps? Semi-defending attitude at him, while trying to get rEdo hanged, while still "suspecting" both. Elaborate, for God's sake. I'm probably getting scumpoints for being curious, too, am I right?
BRBP still needs to talk more, too. I'm not going to throw a shitty lurker vote in that direction, unlike they did at a particular ex-lurker, though.
Gumica, kind of (first part of first sentence), public jabber, Drezi and more public jabber. I don't think you have even read the post.CalignoBot wrote:
Who are you even talking to?Static Noise Bird wrote:
While on the other hand, changing opinions by looking at the game more properly shouldn't be considered a scummy move, Drezi was an improbable scum (while being a probable one for the sheer fact that they played as a "town" well), and now they are just being murky, mainly for changing their opinions. When doing so, don't be so damn mysterious and try to steer away from the fact that you are not willing to explain things properly, if you want to be taken seriously - justify your suspicions and reasonings et cetera. Is CB your scumpartner, perhaps? Semi-defending attitude at him, while trying to get rEdo hanged, while still "suspecting" both. Elaborate, for God's sake. I'm probably getting scumpoints for being curious, too, am I right?
BRBP still needs to talk more, too. I'm not going to throw a shitty lurker vote in that direction, unlike they did at a particular ex-lurker, though.
SNB shoots a gun! The gun backfires!Static Noise Bird wrote:
Shoot: DD
If there is any mistakes, please inform me.Setsuen wrote:
Vote Count 1.8
With 9Alive, it takes 5 to lynch
StaticNoiseBird[0]
CalignoBot[0]
NoHitter[2]CalignoBot,rEdo
BRBP[0]
Gumica[0]
rEdo[L-2]-DakeDekaane,Drezi,NoHitter
fartownik[0]
DakeDekaane[0]
Drezi[1]-Gumica
Not voting:StaticNoiseBird,fartownik,BRBP
With context of everything rEdo has posted this game, post your thoughts on it.NoHitter wrote:
@Caligno
If you look closely at what rEdo did before he attacked Dake though. He was more or less passive regarding his reads. Then suddenly when Dake voted him, he immediately attacked him. Attacking someone who attacked you is not scummy, but how rEdo's temperament changed suddenly is what bothered me.
If there is any mistakes, please inform me.Setsuen wrote:
Vote Count 1.9
With 9Alive, it takes 5 to lynch
StaticNoiseBird[0]
CalignoBot[0]
NoHitter[L-2]CalignoBot,rEdo,fartownik
BRBP[0]
Gumica[0]
rEdo[L-2]-DakeDekaane,Drezi,NoHitter
fartownik[0]
DakeDekaane[0]
Drezi[2]-Gumica,StaticNoiseBird
Not voting:,BRBP