worth the necroPolymelia wrote:
if anyone see's this i got a new computer AND SUPER PUMPED TO TRY OSU IGHT
forum
Upset and Disappointed
posted
Total Posts
68
Gonna take this chance to ask b1rd who in the blue hell pays for an OS since windows 98
because legitimate OS is easier and smoother.VioletMaid wrote:
Gonna take this chance to ask b1rd who in the blue hell pays for an OS since windows 98
haha okB1rd wrote:
because legitimate OS is easier and smoother.VioletMaid wrote:
Gonna take this chance to ask b1rd who in the blue hell pays for an OS since windows 98
Zenarai
I'm not sure who told you there was a direct correlation between fps and accuracy...Zenarai wrote:
Hitting almost all 100s below 600 fps.. No idea how wolf for example records with 240 and still manages to get good score o_o
240fps is plentyZenarai wrote:
Hitting almost all 100s below 600 fps.. No idea how wolf for example records with 240 and still manages to get good score o_o
I run osu on an old pc that was handed down from a friend. After slapping an extra ram chip into it and installing windows 7 it ran like a treat. Osu runs fine on this and this pc is around 7/8 years old! If osu lags on your pc then you must be using something that belongs in a museum.
Having low fps makes it harder to achieve good accuracy, since the lower the fps, the less accurate the game detects the keyboard input. Also, the pointing device latency with low fps makes aiming harder, which can also indirectly make getting good accuracy harder.buny wrote:
I'm not sure who told you there was a direct correlation between fps and accuracy...Zenarai wrote:
Hitting almost all 100s below 600 fps.. No idea how wolf for example records with 240 and still manages to get good score o_o
The difference between 60fps and 240fps is much more significant than, for example, 240fps and 960fps. It is possible to surpass even the most accurate plays ever done with only 200fps.
just because it's "much more significant" doesn't mean it's a big difference, but you've worded it as if you implied it was.Full Tablet wrote:
Having low fps makes it harder to achieve good accuracy, since the lower the fps, the less accurate the game detects the keyboard input. Also, the pointing device latency with low fps makes aiming harder, which can also indirectly make getting good accuracy harder.
The difference between 60fps and 240fps is much more significant than, for example, 240fps and 960fps. It is possible to surpass even the most accurate plays ever done with only 200fps.
It's not.
I am sad now...Tuxdude143 wrote:
I run osu on an old pc that was handed down from a friend. After slapping an extra ram chip into it and installing windows 7 it ran like a treat. Osu runs fine on this and this pc is around 7/8 years old! If osu lags on your pc then you must be using something that belongs in a museum.
Thats subjective.
In your oponion its not a big difference, but from my experience i tend to get a head ace quickly when only playing at 60 fps. My usual max FPS is around 150. I find this difference massive in games like osu!
In your oponion its not a big difference, but from my experience i tend to get a head ace quickly when only playing at 60 fps. My usual max FPS is around 150. I find this difference massive in games like osu!
he stated that he had trouble with accuracy under 600 fps, it's not like his accuracy would magically become better if his fps was above 600Full Tablet wrote:
Having low fps makes it harder to achieve good accuracy, since the lower the fps, the less accurate the game detects the keyboard input. Also, the pointing device latency with low fps makes aiming harder, which can also indirectly make getting good accuracy harder.buny wrote:
I'm not sure who told you there was a direct correlation between fps and accuracy...
The difference between 60fps and 240fps is much more significant than, for example, 240fps and 960fps. It is possible to surpass even the most accurate plays ever done with only 200fps.
of course it'd make a massive difference if he meant 60 fps, but then the comment on wolf's records w/240 fps would be invalid
vsync.png
I play on 120 fps just fine 
How can you even tell the difference between 240 and 600 without the number on the bottom?
The guy was most likely just spamming bs, he got banned anyways. Ironically for streaming 300bpm perfectly on OD 9.
How can you even tell the difference between 240 and 600 without the number on the bottom? The guy was most likely just spamming bs, he got banned anyways. Ironically for streaming 300bpm perfectly on OD 9.
eh every time i read stuff like this i want to build a fast pc cuz i play with around 30 fps at the moment in Osu! lol :')
but then again i want to save up some money first too x)
but then again i want to save up some money first too x)
I refuse to belive that there PC's that much worse than mine.Asiangodx2 wrote:
eh every time i read stuff like this i want to build a fast pc cuz i play with around 30 fps at the moment in Osu! lol :')
but then again i want to save up some money first too x)
over 10 year old hardware...