Hi everyone, I'm a new mapper and I have a workflow question that I can't seem to get right.
Let's say that I map a selected difficulty and I submit it via the new Beatmap Discussion. I get some mods and maybe there is one that suggests something which is a breaking change for a difficulty that needs to be changed in multiple parts or entirely remapped from scratch. In that case, what is the best practice to make the changes/a new diff and submit it so that others can check the difference and provide new feedback?
I thought about making a new diff and then sharing the .osz file with the person who made the mod, but I feel that kind of defeats the purpose of Beatmap Discussion.
In my case, I created a new diff and submitted it, got new feedback, copied it onto the old diff, and deleted the new one. Now the deleted diff shows in the modding discussions, but I feel it's hard to track the history and check what changes have already been made.
What do you think?
Let's say that I map a selected difficulty and I submit it via the new Beatmap Discussion. I get some mods and maybe there is one that suggests something which is a breaking change for a difficulty that needs to be changed in multiple parts or entirely remapped from scratch. In that case, what is the best practice to make the changes/a new diff and submit it so that others can check the difference and provide new feedback?
I thought about making a new diff and then sharing the .osz file with the person who made the mod, but I feel that kind of defeats the purpose of Beatmap Discussion.
In my case, I created a new diff and submitted it, got new feedback, copied it onto the old diff, and deleted the new one. Now the deleted diff shows in the modding discussions, but I feel it's hard to track the history and check what changes have already been made.
What do you think?