nice map
star
star
forum
Yuki Makishima - Yokan (TV Size)
posted
Total Posts
71
Why has no one noticed the faulty timing...?
...I don't mean to offend, but the timing is very faulty on this one...
Offset: -503
BPM: 123.00 (contrary to what MixMeister says, this is actually correct)
Fix up the other timing points afterwards.
Since you posted this map on my queue and you crossed the deathline... I will have to put modding on hold.
...I don't mean to offend, but the timing is very faulty on this one...
Offset: -503
BPM: 123.00 (contrary to what MixMeister says, this is actually correct)
Fix up the other timing points afterwards.
Since you posted this map on my queue and you crossed the deathline... I will have to put modding on hold.
Topic Starter
pete2528 wrote:
nice map
star
azuki wrote:
good map
i love your hitsounds
Thank you, pete2528 and azuki
Topic Starter
Zekira wrote:
Why has no one noticed the faulty timing...?
...I don't mean to offend, but the timing is very faulty on this one...
Offset: -503
BPM: 123.00 (contrary to what MixMeister says, this is actually correct)
Fix up the other timing points afterwards.
Since you posted this map on my queue and you crossed the deathline... I will have to put modding on hold.
I fixed offset and bpm. XD
Thank you very much.
Blue = design/minor issues. you do not have to change these if you don't want to
Orange = moderate issues. it would be best if you change these, but you may be able to get away with not changing it
Red = major issues. you need to change these
timing seems fine to me
[EASY]
its all good
[NORMAL]
fine
[HARD]
no problems!
very nice map. definately rankable in my eyes
star'd
Orange = moderate issues. it would be best if you change these, but you may be able to get away with not changing it
Red = major issues. you need to change these
timing seems fine to me
[EASY]
its all good
[NORMAL]
fine
[HARD]
no problems!
very nice map. definately rankable in my eyes
star'd
Topic Starter
Doomsday93 wrote:
Blue = design/minor issues. you do not have to change these if you don't want to
Orange = moderate issues. it would be best if you change these, but you may be able to get away with not changing it
Red = major issues. you need to change these
timing seems fine to me
[EASY]
its all good
[NORMAL]
fine
[HARD]
no problems!
very nice map. definately rankable in my eyes
star'd
Thank you!
Hi ^^
- Easy:
- Easy:
- .Suggestions:
00:14:862 (1) - how about ending it at 0:17:057?
01:19:253 (1) - how about ending it at 1:21:448?
- .Opinions:
Abit hard, in my opinion
.Suggestions:
00:14:862 (1) - how about ending it at 0:17:057?
01:19:253 (1) - how about ending it at 1:21:448?
- .Suggestions:
00:14:862 (1) - how about ending it at 0:17:057?
01:19:253 (1) - how about ending it at 1:21:448?
Topic Starter
I changed ends of all spinner.Card N'FoRcE wrote:
Hi ^^
- Easy:- Normal:
- .Suggestions:
00:14:862 (1) - how about ending it at 0:17:057?
01:19:253 (1) - how about ending it at 1:21:448?- Hard:
- .Opinions:
Abit hard, in my opinion
.Suggestions:
00:14:862 (1) - how about ending it at 0:17:057?
01:19:253 (1) - how about ending it at 1:21:448?Great job ^^
- .Suggestions:
00:14:862 (1) - how about ending it at 0:17:057?
01:19:253 (1) - how about ending it at 1:21:448?
Thanks for your mod and star
:3 nice map, nice vid, nice background <3, nice *star
Topic Starter
Thank you!EEeee wrote:
:3 nice map, nice vid, nice background <3, nice *star
Overall:
00:08:052 --->> 00:12:066 too loud.try volume~50%~
00:23:064 --->> 00:48:027 ^
00:50:022 --->> 01:04:049 ^
01:05:083 --->> 01:16:032 ^
01:18:003 (1,2) - ^
00:48:052 (1) - volume ~70%~
[Hard]
00:28:076 (9) - new combo?
00:32:066 (7) - ^
nice map.
star*
00:08:052 --->> 00:12:066 too loud.try volume~50%~
00:23:064 --->> 00:48:027 ^
00:50:022 --->> 01:04:049 ^
01:05:083 --->> 01:16:032 ^
01:18:003 (1,2) - ^
00:48:052 (1) - volume ~70%~
[Hard]
00:28:076 (9) - new combo?
00:32:066 (7) - ^
nice map.
star*
Topic Starter
Thanks for your mod and star!gdeath wrote:
Overall:
00:08:052 --->> 00:12:066 too loud.try volume~50%~
00:23:064 --->> 00:48:027 ^
00:50:022 --->> 01:04:049 ^
01:05:083 --->> 01:16:032 ^
01:18:003 (1,2) - ^
00:48:052 (1) - volume ~70%~
// I got it. But I setted default volume to 70%. under 60% is a little bit silence.
[Hard]
00:28:076 (9) - new combo? // fixed
00:32:066 (7) - ^ // fixed
nice map.
star*
go go ~ 
Topic Starter
panic_on wrote:
star~
Thank you, panic and siriruS i R i R u wrote:
go go ~
[General]
WAIT, well I found a lot of those timing points that land directly on notes... maybe you could move them 1/4 before (I won't point out where since there are quite a number of them)
...that's it for now.
Well in particular an example here is timing section I saw in [Easy], the one in 17:057. Maybe you could at least move it 1/4 before?Larto wrote:
ARGH. DON'T PLACE TIMING SECTIONS THAT ONLY CHANGE THE SAMPLE SET OR THE VOLUME DIRECTLY ON NOTES. AT LEAST 1/4 BEFORE THEM.
WAIT, well I found a lot of those timing points that land directly on notes... maybe you could move them 1/4 before (I won't point out where since there are quite a number of them)
...that's it for now.
Topic Starter
I know. I didn't place audio timing point at right on circle or start of slider.(except gradually changing volume section)Zekira wrote:
[General]Well in particular an example here is timing section I saw in [Easy], the one in 17:057. Maybe you could at least move it 1/4 before?Larto wrote:
ARGH. DON'T PLACE TIMING SECTIONS THAT ONLY CHANGE THE SAMPLE SET OR THE VOLUME DIRECTLY ON NOTES. AT LEAST 1/4 BEFORE THEM.
WAIT, well I found a lot of those timing points that land directly on notes... maybe you could move them 1/4 before (I won't point out where since there are quite a number of them)
...that's it for now.
I put it on only at the end of slider and the end of spinner. No problem at these cases.
I personally would suggest you to redo the whistle hitsounds of easy. It sounds very randomly to me.
Topic Starter
~_~? whistle made by almost same rule to Normal and Hard.ccbp wrote:
I personally would suggest you to redo the whistle hitsounds of easy. It sounds very randomly to me.
If you felt like randomly, because maybe there is not exist many notes.
Anyway thanks for your star and suggestion
[Easy]
00:39:074 (4) - This might look slightly better if you line the startpoint up with that of 1.
00:51:069 (2) - Same, but with the endpoint.
[Normal]
00:05:035 (5) - Stack under the endpoint of 3?
00:38:003 (3) - I don't really like this slightly elevated slider, lol.
[Hard]
Quite good and fun.
Starred!
00:39:074 (4) - This might look slightly better if you line the startpoint up with that of 1.
00:51:069 (2) - Same, but with the endpoint.
[Normal]
00:05:035 (5) - Stack under the endpoint of 3?
00:38:003 (3) - I don't really like this slightly elevated slider, lol.
[Hard]
Quite good and fun.
Starred!
Topic Starter
Thanks for your mod and star!Kytoxid wrote:
[Easy]
00:39:074 (4) - This might look slightly better if you line the startpoint up with that of 1. // fixed
00:51:069 (2) - Same, but with the endpoint. // fixed
[Normal]
00:05:035 (5) - Stack under the endpoint of 3?
00:38:003 (3) - I don't really like this slightly elevated slider, lol.
[Hard]
Quite good and fun.
Starred!
Ya~Nice map~ 
The whistle was a little bit loud for me ,turn volume of them down?
[Easy]
Fine~
[Normal]
Fine~
[Hard]
00:51:20(4)-I'd like it end here 00:51:69 and remove 5~
01:00:72(x)-Add a note here?
01:06:81(4)-End here 01:07:30 remove 5?
01:16:33(x)-Add a note here?
Nothing else~
Star~
The whistle was a little bit loud for me ,turn volume of them down?
[Easy]
Fine~
[Normal]
Fine~
[Hard]
00:51:20(4)-I'd like it end here 00:51:69 and remove 5~
01:00:72(x)-Add a note here?
01:06:81(4)-End here 01:07:30 remove 5?
01:16:33(x)-Add a note here?
Nothing else~
Star~
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
kino77 wrote:
Ya~Nice map~
The whistle was a little bit loud for me ,turn volume of them down? // adjusted volume in whole time again.
[Easy]
Fine~
[Normal]
Fine~
[Hard]
00:51:20(4)-I'd like it end here 00:51:69 and remove 5~ // This slider is based on vocal, and 5 is clap pattern. not changed.
01:00:72(x)-Add a note here? // each parts in chorus have not continuous beats, so not changed.
01:06:81(4)-End here 01:07:30 remove 5?
01:16:33(x)-Add a note here?
Nothing else~
Star~
Thanks for your mod and star!WyndII wrote:
[M0D]
um.... you know, the song is obviously from an anime but why did you put 'anime' in tags? Just put the title of the anime~ orz // removed tag. title is in source.
jk.
[Hard]
So since osu editor is acting weird o.o (please check the timeline and that particular note in that particular timeline lol.)
00:01:936 - click the repeating arrow here, put a whistle? // added
00:02:911 ^ // ^
00:03:039 (3) - do the same in this slider. // ^
00:08:765 - this section is freaking loud. // adjusted volume
Lower the volume a bit please.
00:42:017 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - <3 this part~ //
00:58:003 (7) - why not put finishes on this kind of parts i think it gives moar power to the chorus. and i meant these 00:58:003 (7,1) - // uh.. I see, but whistle works well.
loved it!~
[Normal]
I find similiraties with hard...
but it's fine~ X]
[Easy]
easy.
i hereby give an awesome star to this map~
lol xD
Topic Starter
Thank youscar1410 wrote:
Star~
Stared <3
Nice map
Nice map
Topic Starter
Mystearica wrote:
Good luck with your map, and in the future.
Thank you! Mystearica and quintitemquintitem wrote:
Stared <3
Nice map
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
Thank you!xxheroxx wrote:
Mod Info's:
Green: Suggestions.
Orange: I think you should fix this.
Red: You must fix this.
Starts Suggestions:
All seems ok.
[Easy]
It's ok
[Normal]
It's ok
[Hard]
It's ok
Nice map
Starred~
Thank you!Nharox wrote:
[Overall]
Add the first timing section on 00:00:472! // not necessary
[Hard]
Flawless map, it's really good but you should add kiai time on 00:49:740 (1).
[Easy & Normal]
00:49:740 - Add a note here and a timing section with kiai time (if you want to).
Both maps are good too.
[Easy]
fine
[Normal]
fine
[Hard]
(suggestion) 00:03:039 (3) - to me this look much better under (2), atm to me its looks a lil odd
______________________
very nice maps, well worth a star
fine
[Normal]
fine
[Hard]
(suggestion) 00:03:039 (3) - to me this look much better under (2), atm to me its looks a lil odd
______________________
very nice maps, well worth a star
Topic Starter
Thank you!jericho2442 wrote:
[Easy]
fine
[Normal]
fine
[Hard]
(suggestion) 00:03:039 (3) - to me this look much better under (2), atm to me its looks a lil odd // fixed
______________________
very nice maps, well worth a star
star first
this map is~ super fine, i wonder when will BATS look at this.
Easy:
01:16:570 (3) - new combo for lyrics?
Normal:
01:03:643 (1,2) - it fits the lyrics better if your remove 1's new combo and add a new to 1
Hard:
The combos at some parts confuse me, but it is fine overall
---
Nice map.
01:16:570 (3) - new combo for lyrics?
Normal:
01:03:643 (1,2) - it fits the lyrics better if your remove 1's new combo and add a new to 1
Hard:
The combos at some parts confuse me, but it is fine overall
---
Nice map.
Topic Starter
Thanks for your mod and star!blissfulyoshi wrote:
Easy:
01:16:570 (3) - new combo for lyrics? // fixed
Normal:
01:03:643 (1,2) - it fits the lyrics better if your remove 1's new combo and add a new to 1 // fixed
Hard:
The combos at some parts confuse me, but it is fine overall
---
Nice map.
Also thanks to Suck and WyndII
ΦuΦ
Bubbled.
Bubbled.
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
Topic Starter
Are you sure those are why you can't rank this map?JarJarJacob wrote:
Set preview point at 00:49:025. Offset is 1,468. Kiai at the chorus would be nice.
I wonder you read history of replies.
1. That preview point is loud. So I setted it at start of song. This point is also chorus.
2. Notes exist before offset what you said. Then offset can be minus value.
3. I don't use Kiai time at this map.
It doesn't matter. Besides, your offset was wrong to begin with.ykcarrot wrote:
2. Notes exist before offset what you said. Then offset can be minus value.
I've got this offset: 230
You have to resnap all notes on all difficulties.
You have to resnap all notes on all difficulties.
Topic Starter
Zekira wrote:
Why has no one noticed the faulty timing...?
...I don't mean to offend, but the timing is very faulty on this one...
Offset: -503
BPM: 123.00 (contrary to what MixMeister says, this is actually correct)
Fix up the other timing points afterwards.
Since you posted this map on my queue and you crossed the deathline... I will have to put modding on hold.
OK, Please look at this pic.
As you know, every song have phrase. Offset must posit at start of phrase.
If you catch offset correctly, long white tick will be start of a phrase.
If set offset at 230ms(osuplayer111's one), timing maybe good. Just +2ms difference.
But metronome sounds be weird. Because, actually 230ms is not start of a phrase.
How about JarJarJacob's one(1,468ms)?
Yes, this point is start of phrase. But too late from current long white tick. (+20ms)
Then should I set offset at 1,448ms or 1,450ms?
My answer is 'NO'.
If I set any timing point at 1,2,3(pink circles) → FAIL (mean, I can't set any timing points before 1st offset)
Zekira is right.
No problem at Current offset.
Okay.... 
First off, the current offset is balanced. Everyone here seems to keep saying "Oh well the song starts here at xx:xx:xxx". True that is where the lyrics start BUT, that doesn't always mean the offset is there. If you pay more attention to how the song starts, you sense it feels like that other .5 seconds is cut out of the song which adds to the need of the negative offset. Negative offsets can be used when the real starting point of the song is not within the actual normal playing audio range in the beatmap. Try checking the other beatmaps that had to use below 0 offsets before bashing about it please. I'm SERIOUS.
And also, kiai time is OPTIONAL, not a demand to make the map rankable. This map "could" use kiai, but can still go without it as well.
On the sidenote, didn't find any errors from modding.
First off, the current offset is balanced. Everyone here seems to keep saying "Oh well the song starts here at xx:xx:xxx". True that is where the lyrics start BUT, that doesn't always mean the offset is there. If you pay more attention to how the song starts, you sense it feels like that other .5 seconds is cut out of the song which adds to the need of the negative offset. Negative offsets can be used when the real starting point of the song is not within the actual normal playing audio range in the beatmap. Try checking the other beatmaps that had to use below 0 offsets before bashing about it please. I'm SERIOUS.
And also, kiai time is OPTIONAL, not a demand to make the map rankable. This map "could" use kiai, but can still go without it as well.
On the sidenote, didn't find any errors from modding.
Topic Starter
This map has been deleted on the request of its creator. It is no longer available.
"Tokimeki" at the tags is unnecessary, since it's also at the Source field, but since that's the only "issue" I see in this map, I don't see why it can't be ranked.
Topic Starter
Thank you! Sinistro