I'm gonna start this off by just saying (which most decent players probably already know) that most 5-6* and maybe some 7* have all one thing in common; LONG NOTE SPAM. It seems like most modern mappers just slap in a few thousand LNs and call it a day. It's uncommon to see 6* nowadays with no LN spam. Yes this does technically mean you could have higher star maps and clear them easier, but it gets *real* stale after. So what are your thoughts? Do you think that LN-based maps are good? Or do you think that LN-based maps are boring?
forum
o!m new hard maps suck
posted
Total Posts
3
Topic Starter
not a big fan of the ln meta but it's not really the mappers' faults
the reason you hardly see stuff above 6* without ln is because the star rating system is completely useless and for a pure rice file to be 6* it needs to be insanely difficult to where people are scared to rank it or just boring chord spam (super dense chordjacks or handstream)
meanwhile lots short ln spam makes files like blue zenith 6* without anyone breaking a sweat
the reason you hardly see stuff above 6* without ln is because the star rating system is completely useless and for a pure rice file to be 6* it needs to be insanely difficult to where people are scared to rank it or just boring chord spam (super dense chordjacks or handstream)
meanwhile lots short ln spam makes files like blue zenith 6* without anyone breaking a sweat