1. Easy (1.88 stars, 80 notes)
2. Hard (4.89 stars, 218 notes)
3. Normal (4.02 stars, 135 notes)
4. Skystar's Insane (4.98 stars, 223 notes)

Amamiya Yuko wrote:

http://puu.sh/6iugs.osu
史上最快insane

S o a p wrote:

wpcap 刚刚写了一串mod手一滑关了浏览器
[Hard]
统一widescreen suppot
这个HARD前面这么缓和的地方跳的都比kiai多，建议在kiai部分挑几个重音跳一下，比如01:15:331 (5) - 01:16:247 (7) - 这样的 改是改了，但感覺這還會在改回來，畢竟我這個hard偏難
01:05:713 (2) - 这个滑条应该在白线上 這裡原本想說跟vocal，不過在白線上好像好點 改咯
01:10:293 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 连打声音太大 建议改成50~60% 突出后面那个finish音fix
01:14:415 (2) - 滑条尾巴改成note吧？ 那滑條不就不見了嗎= =
00:59:759 (5) - 01:00:675 (2) - 这两个都是重音，你都没放跳，却在01:02:278 (6) - 这个音量减小的地方间距拉大，不懂 做這歌的時候沒聽啥重音，懶改
00:36:426 (1,2,3,4) - flow不太好吧，3和4ctrl+G试试 vocal給我的感覺是這樣，沒改 不過之後會再看看
00:39:632 (4) - 不太好看 調了下
00:48:563 (9) - 这里间距突然变了一小下没看懂为什么 好像也没什么意义 這裡沒變小@@

[Normal]
00:15:128 (2,3) - 间距不太对哦-0- fix
00:46:273 (6,7) - ^ 沒阿?
00:49:937 (4,5,1) - ^^

[Easy]
00:25:204 (3) - 没包好？有阿?

然后美丽

1. Mind finding a 16:9 BG if possible, since most players use a widescreen resolution for this game? Also, reduce the file size of the BG to around 200 KB to make the beatmap package's size smaller?
2. I feel that the second and third combo color are a bit similar...

1. 00:12:380 (5) - Umm, since two stanzas have already passed since the last NC, add one here? It might be too short since it's just one stanza, but I think it fits the song's rhythm.
2. 00:14:212 (1,2,3) - I personally find this kind of pattern jarring, because 00:14:212 (1,2) looks pretty far from each other, while 00:15:128 (2,3) is very close. Consider making a neater pattern by making 00:15:128 (2,3) spaced similar to 00:14:212 (1,2) maybe? At least make it look less clustered...
3. 00:17:876 (4,1) - Swap NC to follow the "NC-every-two-stanzas" pattern? I can't see any reason to break the pattern.
4. 00:21:540 (3) - I'd NC this since the music's rhythm kind of "restarts" here, then remove the NC at 00:23:372 (1) and add one at 00:25:204 (3).
5. 00:34:365 (1,3,1) - Uh, consider making the spacing between them the same? Again, it just feels weird to have them spaced differently...
6. 00:41:693 (1,2) - I know what do you want to do here, but I think the overlap looks bad... and can this be perfectly played by a new player? Because to be honest, I don't think so orz
7. 00:45:357 (3,4) - ^
8. 01:21:056 (4,5) - Uh, I don't think a stack is okay in an Easy diff... It's kinda hard to read for an Easy diff, IMO.

1. 00:09:861 (1,2) - Uh, what's with the inconsistent spacing? It's very hard to read and breaks the flow, seriously. Try another pattern, maybe?
2. 00:45:357 (5,1) - Swap NC? The combo pattern is broken here, btw. This should help making it consistent again.
3. 00:58:613 (4,5) - I understand what do you want to do here, but a spacing inconsistency like this in a Normal diff is confusing...
4. 00:59:759 (6,1) - Swap NC? The new stanza begins at 00:59:987, so I can't see why you're doing this...
5. 01:02:965 (1,2) - ^
6. 01:05:255 (6,1) - ^ (Applies to all similar cases.)

1. 00:01:388 - Why are you ignoring the instrument here? I think it's jarring since the sound is relatively loud, so why leave it unmapped? I'd be okay if there's anything at 00:01:617 to follow, but there nothing, not even any vocal.
2. 00:09:861 (3,4) - Ctrl+G makes these notes follow the song's rhythm more accurately. Try it?
3. 00:21:082 (5,6) - Uh, looking at the previous patterns, I fear this is going to throw off players because there's no way of knowing that the spacing changes here.
4. 00:23:601 (2,3) - ^
5. 00:32:991 (1,2) - ^. For this one, I guess to stack (2) below (1)'s head. It fits with the song and is definitely more readable.
6. 00:36:426 (1,2,3,4) - I think the flow here is forced... Try this?
7. 00:40:319 (5,6) - Same as 00:21:082 (5,6). I think this pattern is too advanced for a Hard diff...
8. 00:55:407 (1) - Try adding an NC because of the SV change, and add a clap at the end to emphasize the instrument?
9. 01:15:331 (1) - Add NC here to accentuate the music? It follows how the instruments here are played more correctly, IMO...

1. 00:13:067 - Remove the whistle here and add one at 00:13:296 instead? Fits the sounds of the instruments here better, at least in my opinion.
2. 00:20:968 - There is nothing here in the song, and it just doesn't flow along well with the music in any way, so please consider not to map this tick, as it'll make players confused with the conflict between the rhythm of your map and the song. I know overmapping is fine and even a great thing to do sometimes, but that doesn't apply here.
3. 00:21:197 - ^
4. 00:31:846 (5,6) - Consider making the spacing equal to 00:31:388 (3,4) since the strength of the instruments here and there are the same?
5. 00:40:090 - Uh, try to add something here to follow the vocal? I know you're trying to emphasize the instruments here, but it feels wrong because you mapped the vocal at 00:39:632 too.
6. 00:40:319 (2,3) - I feel like there's almost no way of knowing that these notes are spaced by 3/4 beats in the timeline, which makes it very difficult to play, and even when you managed to hit it correctly in time, this will break the flow while playing since the rhythm of the objects here is basically broken/inconsistent with what you've made before.
7. 01:02:964 - Might as well add a circle here to make a stream and to connect the instruments that you've mapped around here? I mean, the instrument and vocal here is very noticeable, and yet you decided to only map the weaker instruments at 01:02:849 and 01:03:078... I see no reason why should those two ticks be emphasized while ignoring that red tick.
8. 01:18:078 (5,1) - The music's rhythm "restarts" (like a stanza change) at 01:18:078, so maybe swap the NC?