forum

[osu!mania] Terminal 11 - Counter Clockwise Chant Pattern by Phil

posted
Total Posts
3

Should Terminal 11 - Counter Clockwise Chant Pattern be Loved?

Yes
86
91.49%
No
8
8.51%
Total votes: 94
Polling ended
Topic Starter
RandomeLoL
Main thread: [osu!mania] Project Loved: March 2023

Terminal 11 - Counter Clockwise Chant Pattern by Phil
140.8 – 183.04 BPM, 3:39 | 4.68★ – 5.76★

Captain's description (by RandomeLoL):
It's been a while since we've seen Phil around Loved. After 5, we'd like to welcome them back! And what better set to do this with than their interpretation on Terminal 11 - Counter Clockwise Chant Pattern.

Don't be too fooled, however. Both difficulties are the same, structure-wise that is. The difference is that Xaywise adds some very short long notes to make sure players are keeping their trigger fingers on point. Suffice to say, make sure to release the notes as quickly as possible! Anyway, the rest of the chart is as uncomfortable and fun as you can get with Terminal 11's works! Quirky, weird rhythms, and even quirkier, weirder patterns. The combination of these two makes this tech set quite fun if you're into it.

We hope that our returning mapper has a good impression on the community!

Please use this thread to discuss why you believe this map should or should not enter the Loved category!
Shoegazer
Xay has nothing to do with this map -- any credits to his name should be removed. "Xaywise" is just a nod to him because he's made so many T11 maps and Xay has been a huge mentor to Phil while he was starting out in charting. Timebomb was made because I asked Phil to make a no-short LN map as a backup pick for MWC 2021, but that didn't happen.
Topic Starter
RandomeLoL
This has been brought up and I'm asking to see if we can get the newspost changed. I can edit this later. Sorry for the mishap, was told incorrectly.

-> Got the OK to get things changed. I've changed the description and creators in this thread. Those should be the ones now used in the Newspost likewise.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply