YeY Ranked! o/♥
forum
nano.RIPE - Nanairo Biyori (TV Ver.)
posted
Total Posts
120
ㄷㄷ;; 여튼 첫랭 축하드립니다!![ Yuki ] wrote:
좋아!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 드뎌 랭크다!!!!!!!!!!!오오 테러다~~~야어우야뉴녀노내노노너너너야우냐모냐뉴야도댜노냐너내어우앶 랭크다!!!!!!!!
랭크 파괴하자!!!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~카레 랭크다~~~~~~~~~~~오오오오오ㅗ오오오오오오오오오ㅗ오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오오에에에에에에에에에에에애애애애애애ㅐ오아오아오아와오아
추카추카추카추카추카추카추카추타투패쿠채누처 ;랭크추카추카추키추카추카하하하하라하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하하라하
랭크 축하드립니다!
첫랭 축하합니다~
Sorry but maybe rank BAT didn't find this. I mean in Insane, distance wrong, I know it is insane but it seems be unrankble and difficult to a player can pass via first time.
Img
You can see distance from 00:17:718 (6) to 00:18:837 (7) and 00:19:061 (8) to 00:19:172 (9) seem be similar but one is 1/2 rhythm and one is 1/4
Any BAT can see this?You can see distance from 00:17:718 (6) to 00:18:837 (7) and 00:19:061 (8) to 00:19:172 (9) seem be similar but one is 1/2 rhythm and one is 1/4
I agree with Oyatsu. Although it's an insane diff, it seems bad spacing.
I played with none/dt mod,seem that it's readable for me both(maybe due the to music), so I think it's not an unrankable issue. but it's good to fix the spacing(if you are not on purpose).
unranked because of misplaced note on Insane diff
My Insane diff?
카렌님의 인세인에 문제가 발견되었습니다.HabiHolic wrote:
My Insane diff?
No, In Insane diff not Habi's Insane diff lol xDHabiHolic wrote:
My Insane diff?
Can't we have a bg with better quality than the current one, please? .w.
Oh yeah, forgot mentioning this. Since it's the same picture, using Vicho's one might be nice..Leader wrote:
Can't we have a bg with better quality than the current one, please? .w.
BG 퀄 향상을 부탁합니다. orz
저도 오모이 요시노 3번 언랭처먹음 ㅅㅂ
간단한 문제로 보이니까 수정하면 바로 리랭크 될거에요 ~_~
간단한 문제로 보이니까 수정하면 바로 리랭크 될거에요 ~_~
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ진짜 랭크 파괴됨ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ계획대로군 후훗 
New BG and removed the anti-jump pattern in 'Insane'.
and now re-ranked
good good good :33
Stack Leniency 0 on Hard difficulty is unrankable. Please set it back to 7.
WTF it was 0?????????????????????????????
I though it was 2 orz
I though it was 2 orz
Meh,,p3n wrote:
Stack Leniency in Hard is fine (value set in editor) and the desired effect works fine for the triplets.
Stack leniency hasn't been a rule for 8 months, so it's not a reason to unrank this.Melophobia wrote:
Stack Leniency 0 on Hard difficulty is unrankable. Please set it back to 7.
Thread discussing stack leniency
but there is another reason.Charles445 wrote:
Stack leniency hasn't been a rule for 8 months, so it's not a reason to unrank this.Melophobia wrote:
Stack Leniency 0 on Hard difficulty is unrankable. Please set it back to 7.
Thread discussing stack leniency
need to break the rule if use stack leniency 0 because minimum is 0.2 in the editor. how do you feel about this?Ranking Criteria wrote:
Do not manually edit anything in an .osu file that cannot be changed through the Editor. The only exceptions are .osu-specific storyboards and skin-related options such as SliderBorder and SliderTrackOverride.
.....
Sorry.. ( Melophobia , Charles445 , NewRulerNA )
Stack leniency 0 > 0.2 ~ 0.7
Change?
Sorry.. ( Melophobia , Charles445 , NewRulerNA )
Stack leniency 0 > 0.2 ~ 0.7
Change?
By unrankable I meant the value couldn't be below 2 unless the mapper manually changed the .osu file. I'm aware that the rule has been switched to a guideline but there's still a guideline regarding stack leniency which must not be violated unless it makes sense. Stack leniency is essentially meant to be used for a specific pattern where the stacking feature doesn't work properly, but in the said difficulty there's only ordinary stacks and the value of stack leniency is beyond the intended usage, which doesn't make any sense and warrants an unrank imo.Charles445 wrote:
Stack leniency hasn't been a rule for 8 months, so it's not a reason to unrank this.Melophobia wrote:
Stack Leniency 0 on Hard difficulty is unrankable. Please set it back to 7.
Thread discussing stack leniency
Well, what's done is done. I've talked with the mapper and apparently they agreed to the stack leniency change and we've fixed source since it was slightly incorrect. Let's rerank this quickly.
조아저씨 너무하잖앜ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ[ Yuki ] wrote:
ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ진짜 랭크 파괴됨ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ계획대로군 후훗
비위 문제는 아니고 명백한 언랭 사유 때문입니다. :3__M A S__ wrote:
랭곡 하나 만들기 참 힘듬..
뱃 비위도 맞춰줘야하고..
으앙 ㄷㄷ
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
I've just seen this map and now I'm thinking that,
it would be good if some basic hitsounds could be added before reranking again
the points below are so basic that no reason is needed to be given imo
but still, I'm not forcing anything cause these are of course not unrankable issue
Easy
00:19:509 - finish
00:48:166 - ^
00:55:330 - ^
Normal
00:18:613 - finish
00:55:330 - ^
01:00:703 - ^
01:26:673 - ^
01:09:210 - clap
01:23:539 - ^
Zzz's Hard
00:12:345 - whistle
00:22:419 - ^
00:18:613 - finish
01:00:031 - ^
01:21:748 - remove whistle
Insane
00:18:613 - finish
00:47:046 - ^
01:23:986 - ^
01:26:673 - ^
00:53:875 - clap (?)
Habi's Insane
00:32:942 - finish
00:47:046 - ^
00:46:151 - move finish to 00:46:598 - (?)
That's all
Good luck
it would be good if some basic hitsounds could be added before reranking again
the points below are so basic that no reason is needed to be given imo
but still, I'm not forcing anything cause these are of course not unrankable issue
Easy
00:19:509 - finish
00:48:166 - ^
00:55:330 - ^
Normal
00:18:613 - finish
00:55:330 - ^
01:00:703 - ^
01:26:673 - ^
01:09:210 - clap
01:23:539 - ^
Zzz's Hard
00:12:345 - whistle
00:22:419 - ^
00:18:613 - finish
01:00:031 - ^
01:21:748 - remove whistle
Insane
00:18:613 - finish
00:47:046 - ^
01:23:986 - ^
01:26:673 - ^
00:53:875 - clap (?)
Habi's Insane
00:32:942 - finish
00:47:046 - ^
00:46:151 - move finish to 00:46:598 - (?)
That's all
Good luck
Topic Starter
all doneZero__wind wrote:
I've just seen this map and now I'm thinking that,
it would be good if some basic hitsounds could be added before reranking again
the points below are so basic that no reason is needed to be given imo
but still, I'm not forcing anything cause these are of course not unrankable issue
Easy
00:19:509 - finish
00:48:166 - ^
00:55:330 - ^
Normal
00:18:613 - finish
00:55:330 - ^
01:00:703 - ^
01:26:673 - ^
01:09:210 - clap
01:23:539 - ^
Zzz's Hard
00:12:345 - whistle
00:22:419 - ^
00:18:613 - finish
01:00:031 - ^
01:21:748 - remove whistle
Insane
00:18:613 - finish
00:47:046 - ^
01:23:986 - ^
01:26:673 - ^
00:53:875 - clap (?)
Habi's Insane
00:32:942 - finish
00:47:046 - ^
00:46:151 - move finish to 00:46:598 - (?)
That's all
Good luck
sounds much better now
bubble repaired
bubble repaired
habis insane
01:03:837 (1) - make a proper triangle here
01:18:166 (3) - move it to 436;204
hard
00:19:061 (4,1) - this is quite hard to read because you dont know how much repeats this has. http://puu.sh/6UBFJ.jpg this is better
01:27:345 - this is very bad because the spinner start is not tactile at all and the 5th note doesn't make sense. you have two choices http://puu.sh/6UBPQ.jpg or http://puu.sh/6UBR5.jpg
normal
00:48:166 (1) - too close note after a spinner. you'll need more time to recover, this is a normal diff (00:47:270 - move spinner end here?)
01:01:151 (1) - same (you can remove the first slider after spinner, will help)
easy
00:19:509 (1) - same stuff, too close after spinner. (00:18:613 - move end here?)
00:33:837 (1) - try to place this closer to the screen center to make it easier to play it after spinner
00:47:046 - finish sound is here, place spinner end here?
01:01:151 (1) - same as normal, remove this slider to make it easier to play after spinner
01:03:837 (1) - make a proper triangle here
01:18:166 (3) - move it to 436;204
hard
00:19:061 (4,1) - this is quite hard to read because you dont know how much repeats this has. http://puu.sh/6UBFJ.jpg this is better
01:27:345 - this is very bad because the spinner start is not tactile at all and the 5th note doesn't make sense. you have two choices http://puu.sh/6UBPQ.jpg or http://puu.sh/6UBR5.jpg
normal
00:48:166 (1) - too close note after a spinner. you'll need more time to recover, this is a normal diff (00:47:270 - move spinner end here?)
01:01:151 (1) - same (you can remove the first slider after spinner, will help)
easy
00:19:509 (1) - same stuff, too close after spinner. (00:18:613 - move end here?)
00:33:837 (1) - try to place this closer to the screen center to make it easier to play it after spinner
00:47:046 - finish sound is here, place spinner end here?
01:01:151 (1) - same as normal, remove this slider to make it easier to play after spinner
Topic Starter
grumd wrote:
habis insane
01:03:837 (1) - make a proper triangle here
01:18:166 (3) - move it to 436;204
hard
00:19:061 (4,1) - this is quite hard to read because you dont know how much repeats this has. http://puu.sh/6UBFJ.jpg this is better
01:27:345 - this is very bad because the spinner start is not tactile at all and the 5th note doesn't make sense. you have two choices http://puu.sh/6UBPQ.jpg or http://puu.sh/6UBR5.jpg
normal
00:48:166 (1) - too close note after a spinner. you'll need more time to recover, this is a normal diff (00:47:270 - move spinner end here?)
01:01:151 (1) - same (you can remove the first slider after spinner, will help)
easy
00:19:509 (1) - same stuff, too close after spinner. (00:18:613 - move end here?)
00:33:837 (1) - try to place this closer to the screen center to make it easier to play it after spinner <<There is a time after a spinner, so it will be ok...
00:47:046 - finish sound is here, place spinner end here?
01:01:151 (1) - same as normal, remove this slider to make it easier to play after spinner
ok i guess ranked again
리랭 축하드려요~
또다시 언랭으로.. ..
Topic Starter
다시한번더 감사합니다 ㅎㅎW h i t e wrote:
리랭 축하드려요~
후..많이..힘드네요..OverPower wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1333375
랭크하시겠다니 진짜로 랭크하셨네요!!
축하드려요~
감사 ㅎㅎ
..........Fast wrote:
또다시 언랭으로.. ..
MAAAAAAAAAAAAAS
아주좋소
