So recently there has been some metadata rule confusion regarding sets that have two or more markers, e.g. (Live Ver.) (Cut Ver.) etc.
Currently the metadata rules only explicitly specify that if the map contains (Cut Ver.) and (Sped Up Ver.) markers then these two markers can be combined into a single marker (Sped Up & Cut Ver.)
While other cases of combined markers are not as common, why are we not implementing this same logic to maps that otherwise may contain two or more markers? Only applying this special circumstance to one specific case seems kind of counterintuitive.
Therefore I propose we replace this rule with a new one that has broader terms:
"If your map contains two or more markers you may combine them into one marker."
This new rule provides more clarity for standardizing maps that contain two or more markers while preserving the intent behind the original rule.
p.s: typing out proposals on mobile is hard
Currently the metadata rules only explicitly specify that if the map contains (Cut Ver.) and (Sped Up Ver.) markers then these two markers can be combined into a single marker (Sped Up & Cut Ver.)
While other cases of combined markers are not as common, why are we not implementing this same logic to maps that otherwise may contain two or more markers? Only applying this special circumstance to one specific case seems kind of counterintuitive.
Therefore I propose we replace this rule with a new one that has broader terms:
"If your map contains two or more markers you may combine them into one marker."
This new rule provides more clarity for standardizing maps that contain two or more markers while preserving the intent behind the original rule.
p.s: typing out proposals on mobile is hard