_Gezo_ wrote:

I think this compilation has not enough senya
I think it needs more senya
(1000夜)

thanks support :3
omg 1000夜 o.O

why say se-nya when we can say sen-ya

No_Gu wrote:

congrats

• 
  
  SPOILER

  1. 00:11:403 (2) - (3)より大きい音量なのはちょっと変に聴こえる
  2. 00:33:717 (1) - 綺麗なスタックではあるんだけど、DS通りに置くよりはジャンプさせる方が楽しいと思う
     00:33:717 - にある強めのピアノの音の強調にもなるし、このあと１拍置いて曲調変わるからメリハリもつくんじゃないかなって
  3. 01:24:295 (1,2,3) - 曲の音量が小さくなってるからジャンプはあまり合わないんじゃない？特に(2,3)
  4. 01:39:415 (5,6) - ctrl+G? 個人的な感覚かもしれないけど、その方が01:39:415 (5,6,7,1) - がうまく流れるように感じた
  5. 01:41:628 (5) - (3)は綺麗にボーカル取れてるけどこっちはそうじゃないからちょっと違和感　画像みたいにスライダー前に単発２つ挟まない？
     
  6. 02:21:843 - 02:21:965 - この2箇所にnote追加？　02:23:672 (1) - ここからの連打でとってる音と同じ音が聴こえるからあったほうがまとまりはある気がする　配置は02:20:745 (3) - にスタックさせて大丈夫だと思う
  7. 03:17:849 (4) - (3)の位置の方が曲の音が強いから、そっちをジャンプさせるほうがいいと思う
     03:17:405 (2,3,4) - をSSみたいに一回入れ替えて試してみてー　http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1257922
  8. 03:18:738 (8) - (6,7)と同じようなドラムが鳴ってる位置だから、それを考えるとDS通りの方がいいのかなって思いますです
  9. 03:36:294 (5) - 03:34:738 - こっちはヒットサウンドどころかオブジェクトもないから、tickと終端のclap外したほうがパターンを作れていいと思う
  10. 04:13:337 (6) - 04:12:234 (2,3,4) - に重なってたからEDIT画面だとちょっとごちゃっとして見えた
      こんな配置とかお嫌い？　http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1257944
      

      308,356,252896,2,0,B|280:368|240:360|240:360|204:384,1,85,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
      160,240,253337,2,0,P|204:248|284:220,1,127.5,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

  11. 05:15:966 (2,3,4) - ジャンプを作る方向のせいかちょっとぎこちない？ 代わりにこんな配置どうだろう (2)は(4)をコピーして180度回転させただけ　http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1257991
      それと(4)終端のclap消す代わりに(3)に追加た方が綺麗ではあるなぁと思った
  12. 05:42:685 (7) - この単発を消して(6)を(5)にスタックとかどうだろう
      (5,6)スタックでドラム強調してそこから次のスライダーに流れが飛ぶからそっちのほうが曲に合いそう
  13. 05:56:055 (2,3) - ここも05:55:620 (3,1) - と同じようにドラムとボーカルに合わせて飛ばしてみるとか？ (3,4)をctrl+Gして次の単発をこう持ってきたりよければ一回試してみてー http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1258024
  14. 07:50:745 (4) -*注意、好みです：　ここにボーカルフォローで連打あったら音取りかっこよくならない？ 配置はこんな感じとか　http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1258045
      
  15. 08:15:453 (4,5,6) - 若干ではあるけど曲に合ってない3連打？ ここに作るよりは08:15:253 - に作ったほうが曲に合うように聴こえるし、08:15:653 (6,7) - 周りのドラムの音も綺麗に聞こえるから気持ちよくジャンプできる、”気がする”
  16. 10:19:318 (4) - 始端にclapを付けるパターンを維持するためにスライダー２つにしてもいいのかも、
      って言おうとしたけど曲にドラムの音がないから多分この２つ目のclapはミス？
  17. 10:29:395 (3) - ボーカルの強迫が終端にあるからちょっと変な音取りに感じる　音取りと配置の提案貼っつけときます！ https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1258097
      
  
  リクエスト通りちょっと大雑把目に！遅れて申し訳ないー
  日をまたいでmod書いてたからかなり支離滅裂なこと言ってるかもしれない
  もしそういう言い回しだとか見つけたら「この人アスペだなー」とかこっそり愚痴っちゃってください
  
  good luck~

DenoisoGoiso wrote:

satellite should have more ranked senya <3
senya <3333333
star \:D/

KSHR wrote:

modding

• 
  
  SPOILER

  1. 00:11:403 (2) - (3)より大きい音量なのはちょっと変に聴こえる
     OK
  2. 00:33:717 (1) - 綺麗なスタックではあるんだけど、DS通りに置くよりはジャンプさせる方が楽しいと思う
     00:33:717 - にある強めのピアノの音の強調にもなるし、このあと１拍置いて曲調変わるからメリハリもつくんじゃないかなって
     配置考え中
  3. 01:24:295 (1,2,3) - 曲の音量が小さくなってるからジャンプはあまり合わないんじゃない？特に(2,3)
     曲調は小さくなってるけど私はこれで合ってると思うからとりあえずキープで！
  4. 01:39:415 (5,6) - ctrl+G? 個人的な感覚かもしれないけど、その方が01:39:415 (5,6,7,1) - がうまく流れるように感じた
     あげてちょい落とすみたいな流れがすきなのでできればこのままで・・・
  5. 01:41:628 (5) - (3)は綺麗にボーカル取れてるけどこっちはそうじゃないからちょっと違和感　画像みたいにスライダー前に単発２つ挟まない？
     
     確かに・・・Fixed~
  6. 02:21:843 - 02:21:965 - この2箇所にnote追加？　02:23:672 (1) - ここからの連打でとってる音と同じ音が聴こえるからあったほうがまとまりはある気がする　配置は02:20:745 (3) - にスタックさせて大丈夫だと思う
     いれてみました
  7. 03:17:849 (4) - (3)の位置の方が曲の音が強いから、そっちをジャンプさせるほうがいいと思う
     03:17:405 (2,3,4) - をSSみたいに一回入れ替えて試してみてー　http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1257922
     音は確かにそっちのほうがフィットしますが流れがあまり好きじゃないので考えて見ます・・・
  8. 03:18:738 (8) - (6,7)と同じようなドラムが鳴ってる位置だから、それを考えるとDS通りの方がいいのかなって思いますです
     次の１に対してのspacingのつもりなので！
  9. 03:36:294 (5) - 03:34:738 - こっちはヒットサウンドどころかオブジェクトもないから、tickと終端のclap外したほうがパターンを作れていいと思う
     次に指摘を頂くと変えます！
  10. 04:13:337 (6) - 04:12:234 (2,3,4) - に重なってたからEDIT画面だとちょっとごちゃっとして見えた
      こんな配置とかお嫌い？　http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1257944
      

      308,356,252896,2,0,B|280:368|240:360|240:360|204:384,1,85,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
      160,240,253337,2,0,P|204:248|284:220,1,127.5,8|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

      5→6→1の流れは凄く好きで使いたいのですがそうすると次の２への流れが悪くなってしまうのでここも保留で・・
  11. 05:15:966 (2,3,4) - ジャンプを作る方向のせいかちょっとぎこちない？ 代わりにこんな配置どうだろう (2)は(4)をコピーして180度回転させただけ　http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1257991
      それと(4)終端のclap消す代わりに(3)に追加た方が綺麗ではあるなぁと思った
      スライダーの上にnoteをKSねるのはあまり好きじゃないのでキープで！２の流れは好きなんですが・・・hitsoundは修正しました！
  12. 05:42:685 (7) - この単発を消して(6)を(5)にスタックとかどうだろう
      (5,6)スタックでドラム強調してそこから次のスライダーに流れが飛ぶからそっちのほうが曲に合いそう
      そっちでもフィットしているのですがグッっと力いれたいから３連打でいきます！(同じ箇所にスタックするのあんまりすきじゃない)
  13. 05:56:055 (2,3) - ここも05:55:620 (3,1) - と同じようにドラムとボーカルに合わせて飛ばしてみるとか？ (3,4)をctrl+Gして次の単発をこう持ってきたりよければ一回試してみてー http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1258024
      この形作りたかったのでキープさせてもらいます＞＜
  14. 07:50:745 (4) -*注意、好みです：　ここにボーカルフォローで連打あったら音取りかっこよくならない？ 配置はこんな感じとか　http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1258045
      
      かっこよくなりました！！！！！！
  15. 08:15:453 (4,5,6) - 若干ではあるけど曲に合ってない3連打？ ここに作るよりは08:15:253 - に作ったほうが曲に合うように聴こえるし、08:15:653 (6,7) - 周りのドラムの音も綺麗に聞こえるから気持ちよくジャンプできる、”気がする”
      ちょいovermap気味だけど叩けるからこのままでも・・・？
  16. 10:19:318 (4) - 始端にclapを付けるパターンを維持するためにスライダー２つにしてもいいのかも、
      って言おうとしたけど曲にドラムの音がないから多分この２つ目のclapはミス？
      ミスでした
  17. 10:29:395 (3) - ボーカルの強迫が終端にあるからちょっと変な音取りに感じる　音取りと配置の提案貼っつけときます！ https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/1258097
      
      確かにちょいおかしいけど代替案ないので保留で
  
  リクエスト通りちょっと大雑把目に！遅れて申し訳ないー
  日をまたいでmod書いてたからかなり支離滅裂なこと言ってるかもしれない
  もしそういう言い回しだとか見つけたら「この人アスペだなー」とかこっそり愚痴っちゃってください
  
  good luck~

thanks for modding

Oyatsu wrote:

Spam Stars War ><

Natteke wrote:

cool map o/

Haganeproductio wrote:

Thank god you've been making this something that even I can play it without no-fail ^A^ Also, gave a star. Osu! needs more senya.

Natsu wrote:

Hi some suggestions :3/

General:

1. Unused Image Files:
   -effect a.png
   -effect b.png

OK I ask patchouli

Marathon:

1. 00:10:163 the vocals who start here are kinda important imo why you don't map it as a circle? will improve the rhythm here the clicks will be more natural to do for players imo some like can work alot better:
   
   SPOILER

   
   I agree :3 But. keep because I guess 00:09:915 - here no music :C
2. 00:11:403 (2,3) - symilar here the empathize with vocals start at 00:11:403 (2) - but nothing start at 00:11:651 (3) - since no music there also the sound at 00:12:147 should be mapped as a circle some like can fit thesong better imo:
   
   SPOILER

   
   Really sorry I like this pattern o.O
3. 00:17:849 (1,2,3) - nazi stack this perfect
   OK
4. 00:23:551 (2,4) - ^
   I guestt It's fine :3
5. 00:31:733 (1,2) - blank this better
   yes... But pattern is broken D: sorry keep ;^;
6. 00:41:651 (5,6) - unstack this? since is 1/4 spacing I preffer if you separed this with some distance instead of the stack since can be confuse cuz you use some antijumps with the same way like 00:43:386 (3,4) - 00:45:370 (3,4) - 00:37:436 (3,4) - so the 00:41:651 (5,6) - can be confused for players thinking is another antijump imo some distance like 00:53:551 (3,4,5) - can work alot better instead
   OK
7. 00:59:750 (6,7) - the transition here see kinda unnatural to play what about to change the 7 position to some like:
   
   SPOILER

   
   No changed. I think follow 01:00:494 (1) -
8. 01:03:965 (1,2) - jsut wondering short combos like this one are really necesary? since I don't see a reason to keep it but maybe you have some special reason for them tought
   Meaning visual
9. 01:35:972 (4,1) - kinda disagree with the rhythm here beats like 01:36:464 need a click'able action due to the empathize them have in the music also is the place of the NC should be having it in 01:36:710 (1) - don't make much empathize with the music what aboutto change the rhythm there to some like:
   
   SPOILER

   
   Or maybe some like 01:59:579 (4,1) -
   you r right :3 But I thought that it is not important T^T
10. 01:43:349 (4,1) - symilar as above
    ^
11. 03:14:516 this downbeat have a important sound imo maybe short the slider and end it here will fit better the music imo
    follow at melody :3
12. 03:49:734 this slider don't sound nice here since the start of it have a little sound in the music almost inaudible and the tail 03:49:955 have alot more empathize in the song what about to change rhythm to improve this part some like:
    
    SPOILER

    
    If not atleast try 2 circles instead of the slider imo
    You are right keep sorry ;^;
13. 03:56:793 (2) - symilar as above
    You are right keep sorry ;^;
14. 04:09:808 (1) - is this single NC necesary imo better remove it will be alot better and consistent also this part is readable enought without it
    Yes. I need Nc here :3
15. 04:29:079 (2,3) - this upbeat sliders don't fit the song and leave the main sounds in the music as slider tails what about to improvethe rhythm here to make it more confortable for players some like:
    
    SPOILER

    
    keep sorry ;^;
16. 04:30:818 (2,3) - same as above
    keep sorry ;^;
17. 04:42:992 (2,3) - ^
    keep sorry ;^;
18. 04:44:731 (2,3) - ^
    keep sorry ;^;
19. 06:17:608 (1) - remove NC? since its not necesary this part can be perfectly readable without it just to keep consistency
    No changed. I think need Nc :3
20. 06:26:286 (3) - really hard to notice the repeat arrow since the previous slider is covering almost all try to make it a little more noticeable
    I think so too T^T But I don't have any idea T^T
21. 06:31:322 (1) - remove NC same reason as 06:17:608
    ^
22. 06:47:057 (5) - not sure since I can't hear nothing in 06:47:165 also the previous repeats have just 1 repeat and this one have 2 can be confuse a better rhythm for this part can be:
    
    SPOILER

    
    OK I find new idea~
23. 06:50:486 (4) - ^
    ^
24. 06:52:843 (3) - NC for the antijump since you was using the 2 beats combos in previous songs
    OK
25. 09:09:240 (1) - not sure about this slider butmaybe you should change the shape of it thought
    OK changed
26. 09:10:789 (1) - a 1/1 slider will fit pretty nice the vocals here try and see if it fit for you
    Yeah. But I like this ;^; sorry thanks suggestion
27. 10:07:693 (1) - use clap + finish for consistency with 10:06:193 (1) - 10:04:693 (1) - 10:01:693 (1) - will be nice imo
    Add
28. 10:34:083 (4,5,6) - use a equal space here to be more confortable to play?
    No changed T^T Consideration of the following 5 stream ;w;
29. 11:01:377 (2,3) - you can blank this a little better ye nazi
    I guess It's fine :3

pretty nice mapset also senya <3 gl have a support star

-Umi- wrote:

Yaho \:D/

Marathon

1. Well first i know it's intentionnal, but there is so many place where you can put spinners, you should ;w; really.
2. 00:03:965 (3) - make it more curved, then do a better blanket with 00:04:709 (4) - it will look better :3
   SPOILER

   
   OK
3. 00:10:907 (1) - i personnally prefer like this, it give a better flow toward (2)
   SPOILER

   
   Sorry T^T no changed
4. 00:14:874 (1,3) - blanket them better
   SPOILER

   
   Sorry T^T no changed
5. 00:18:097 (2,3) - nazi nazi but stack them perfectly
   OK
6. 00:18:593 (4) - move it to 392,192, i was expected a higher DS between 00:18:593 (4,1) -
   Sorry T^T no changed
7. 00:19:832 (4,3) - stack perfectly
   OK
8. 00:24:791 (1) - ctrl g, then if you do, move 00:25:287 (2) - to 172,130
   Sorry T^T no changed
9. 00:27:270 (3) - stack with 00:26:775 (1) - it flow a lot better imo
   Awesome Idea :3 Fixed
10. 00:29:254 (3) - same as before stack with 00:28:758 (1) -
    Awesome Idea :3 Fixed
11. 00:37:436 (3,4) - stack again >.<
    OK
12. 00:40:907 (2,3) - ctrl g? it make enjoyable jumps
    Sorry T^T no changed
13. 00:46:609 (1,3) - what about stack them it look prittier imo :3
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
14. 00:50:080 (6) - change this slider into 2 notes, need the click action on 00:50:328 -
    OK!! a little Jump try this ww haha xD
15. 00:53:551 (3) - should be curved in this way for a better flow
    SPOILER

    
    OK
16. 00:59:998 (7,1) - make a better blanket here '-'
    OK
17. 01:03:965 (1,2) - ctrl g, it need a jump between 01:04:213 (2,1) - >.<
    Sorry T^T no changed
18. 01:09:419 (3) - i think a straight shape could be better here
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
19. 01:12:394 (1,3) - As you can see here, the blanket can be improve
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
20. 01:20:328 (1) - curved in the other way to increase the flow
    
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
21. 01:35:235 (3) - change into 2 notes, example of pattern :
    SPOILER

    
    OK
22. 01:54:415 (2,3) - not really fan of this pattern, don't u want ctrl g ? :3 it give funny jump
    sorry kept
23. 02:13:916 (1,2,3) - use this code, i just improved a bit the blanket
    SPOILER

    352,272,133916,6,0,B|330:231|352:191|352:191|374:149|352:109,2,170,2|8|2,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
    279,150,135136,1,0,0:0:0:0:
    424,232,135380,1,8,0:0:0:0:

    thanks for code D: but keep... I guess it's fine :3
24. 02:44:627 (4,5,6) - ctrl J, and then restack perfectly with 02:44:176 (2) -
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
25. 02:56:131 (8) - NC, the current one is pretty long
    OK
26. 02:48:913 (1,2) - improve the blanket
    OK
27. 03:12:738 (3) - make it curved, and then blanket with 03:11:849 (1) -
    Sorry T^T no changed
28. 03:32:738 (6) - why ? end at 03:32:960 - and add a note 03:33:071 - fit better lol
    I like this
29. 03:36:294 (5) - same here >.<
    >.<
30. 03:49:072 (1) - more curved for a better blanket with 03:49:734 (2) -
    OK
31. 03:52:160 (6,7) - what about replace it by the same slider as 03:51:278 (3) -
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
32. 04:23:644 (1,2) - like this for the flow
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
33. 04:37:992 (3) - make it toward (4) ?
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
34. 05:11:618 - i feel a bit uncomfortable about this little break, add a note here, stack with 05:10:966 (3) - head
    Sorry T^T no changed
35. 05:53:663 (2) - ctrl g
    Sorry T^T no changed
36. 06:23:715 (4) - NC for consistence
    OK
37. 06:42:343 (1) - curved in the other way for flow
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed
38. 06:52:200 (1) - any reason for this NC, remove ?
    Sorry T^T no changed
39. 06:56:057 (5) - NC for consistence again
    OK
40. 07:02:915 (4) - ^
    OK
41. 07:21:329 (1,1) - those NC aren't really needed imo
    Meaning visual
42. 07:34:570 (1,1) - ^
    ^
43. 07:48:515 (2,3) - ctrl g
    Awesome Suggestion~~ Fixed
44. 08:12:453 (5,6) - ^ better flow imo
    ^
45. 09:00:724 (3,4,5,1) - try this pattern ;3
    SPOILER

    
46. 09:13:885 (1) - stack it with 09:11:950 (4) - no ? '-'
    Sorry T^T no changed
47. 09:26:756 (1) - ctrl g as you did in the next pattern
    OK
48. 09:39:506 (1) - delete NC
    OK
49. 11:12:092 (5,1) - blanket ?
    SPOILER

    
    Sorry T^T no changed

And that's all , awesome work satenya ;3 have a star and gl for rank !

1. 02:51:394 (2,3) - Try Ctrl+G and see if you like it.
   
2. 03:02:446 (7) - I recommend a NC here because there is a new rhythm starting. It will help players read the 03:02:785 (8) better.
   
3. 03:25:849 (8,9,1) - The stack causes it to touch the HP bar, maybe you can move 03:23:405 (3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - down a few grids.
   
4. 03:39:405 (2,3) - Imo you should use larger DS because this is a new rhythm. It will help the player realize the 3 is on the blue tick. You can try more like so:
   
   Example

   
5. 05:18:358 (1,2) - Maybe you prefer to switch NC here? Because the downbeat is on 2.
   
6. 09:13:692 - Try a triplet here instead to make it a bit more interesting.
   
   Example

   
7. 09:42:318 (2) - Just flow suggestion. I thought this flow felt strange. It is better if 09:42:318 (2) flows more downwards at first after the 1 imo. Maybe you can try this:
   
   Example

   Copy 09:40:818 (3) and paste at 09:42:318. Flip 180 and place blanketing 3.
   
   That's just an example you can do anything.
8. 11:19:592 (1,2,3,4,1) - Consider to replace these with a spinner. It would make the end of the map unique from the rest since you don't use a spinner anywhere else.

UnitedWeSin wrote:

Hello~ Hi UWS san

[Marathon]

1. 02:51:394 (2,3) - Try Ctrl+G and see if you like it.
   
2. 03:02:446 (7) - I recommend a NC here because there is a new rhythm starting. It will help players read the 03:02:785 (8) better.
   
3. 03:25:849 (8,9,1) - The stack causes it to touch the HP bar, maybe you can move 03:23:405 (3,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - down a few grids.
   
4. 03:39:405 (2,3) - Imo you should use larger DS because this is a new rhythm. It will help the player realize the 3 is on the blue tick. You can try more like so:
   
   Example

   
5. 05:18:358 (1,2) - Maybe you prefer to switch NC here? Because the downbeat is on 2.
   You are right. but keep. I guess Pentagon is beautiful lol
   
6. 09:13:692 - Try a triplet here instead to make it a bit more interesting.
   
   Example

   
7. 09:42:318 (2) - Just flow suggestion. I thought this flow felt strange. It is better if 09:42:318 (2) flows more downwards at first after the 1 imo. Maybe you can try this:
   
   Example

   Copy 09:40:818 (3) and paste at 09:42:318. Flip 180 and place blanketing 3.
   
   That's just an example you can do anything.
   thanks for suggestion :3 but sorry. I think it =,=
   
8. 11:19:592 (1,2,3,4,1) - Consider to replace these with a spinner. It would make the end of the map unique from the rest since you don't use a spinner anywhere else.

Really wonderful map. Check these and I can rank.