0_o ends up choking himself with a wooden stethoscope.
Night 1 Begins
You know the drill guise.
Night 1 Begins
You know the drill guise.
loledited.BagelBob wrote:
He edited, which is why I lol'd.Derekku Chan wrote:
That's not very nice =(
Nope.Pasonia wrote:
0_o is dead but nobody was killed for Night 1?
You didn't ask who died...Derekku Chan wrote:
Hey... why didn't you announce BB's death? D:
Hmm, I should try that.Derekku Chan wrote:
2) strager is being mean and maybe gave me a crazy sanity where I don't get results ._.
It turns out that BB was innocent, but that still doesn't prove Pasonia's innocence. He could have easily made up this bit because obviously if he's the traitor, then everyone else would be innocent.Pasonia wrote:
It was funny really; I was told that I was an "Innocent" i.e. I am a Vanilla Mafia, and BagelBob is innocent.
Bagel, on the other hand, can be believed. I see no reason why a townie would make up something like this, and since he was cleared, then I should also be cleared.BagelBob wrote:
I'm a Vanillia Mafia with the append that Derekku is Innocent.
I am obligated to believe Pasonia. Pasonia posted about Bagel's innocence BEFORE Bagel posted. The traitor wouldn't have known that someone ACTUALLY got a note like that in their role PM. The traitor would've seen what Bagel posted and then made up something AFTERWARDS.0_o wrote:
I think it's safe to clear Pasonia, since he was the first one to say he received someone else's innocence in their PM.
Of course, I'm inclined to believe Pasonia for similar reasons. However, we still have not disproved the possibilities of the info Pasonia and BB recieved being incorrect. Pasonia's info is obviously true, whereas with you being the only possible suspect in MY eyes, BB's info was false.Derekku Chan wrote:
It turns out that BB was innocent, but that still doesn't prove Pasonia's innocence. He could have easily made up this bit because obviously if he's the traitor, then everyone else would be innocent.Pasonia wrote:
It was funny really; I was told that I was an "Innocent" i.e. I am a Vanilla Mafia, and BagelBob is innocent.Bagel, on the other hand, can be believed. I see no reason why a townie would make up something like this, and since he was cleared, then I should also be cleared.BagelBob wrote:
I'm a Vanillia Mafia with the append that Derekku is Innocent.
But wait, after re-reading and seeing this:I am obligated to believe Pasonia. Pasonia posted about Bagel's innocence BEFORE Bagel posted. The traitor wouldn't have known that someone ACTUALLY got a note like that in their role PM. The traitor would've seen what Bagel posted and then made up something AFTERWARDS.0_o wrote:
I think it's safe to clear Pasonia, since he was the first one to say he received someone else's innocence in their PM.
That only leaves us with LS, whom has only been suspicious this whole time. Vote: LadySuburu
And there you have it.
I hate you too, you faggot avatar changer.Derekku Chan wrote:
Blugh strager I hate you for making this so 'crazy' xd
I'm not certain if 0_o was really the doctor, but I am the cop. I had no direction on Night 0 (obviously), so I randomly picked you to investigate. With an "Unknown" result, I thought that I would try investigating the same person (you) again to see if it would do anything. Without knowing my sanity, I thought I might as well try to do something useful instead of scanning another random person and leaving me even more clueless.Pasonia wrote:
1. Are you certain that additional roles existed for this game? If so, provide a rationale for why DChan wanted to investigate me, of all people, twice.
I really have nothing to add. What you've said in this paragraph pretty much sums up how I feel about LS in this game.Pasonia wrote:
2. LadySuburu has not spoken much on his identity, claiming all the while to be civilian. While I understand that there's close to nothing to back this up, the fact that so little has been said by LS (not even getting involved in the fracas b/w me and 0_o) does provide some cause for suspicion. Is there anything you might want to add in the reasoning?
1. I'm not sure what you're asking here.Pasonia wrote:
I'm entering confirmation of vote phase, so I'll need you both to answer some pretty crucial questions.
1. Are you certain that additional roles existed for this game? If so, provide a rationale for why DChan wanted to investigate me, of all people, twice.
2. LadySuburu has not spoken much on his identity, claiming all the while to be civilian. While I understand that there's close to nothing to back this up, the fact that so little has been said by LS (not even getting involved in the fracas b/w me and 0_o) does provide some cause for suspicion. Is there anything you might want to add in the reasoning?
Both persons should answer these two questions. I want a strong, clear, concise answer, not wishy-washy "I think"s. I want you to be as truthful as possible, even if that means you lied about something, such as being a cop. Of course, I'm not expecting the traitor to 'fess up, still.
That's the secret. I mean, seriously, four Mafia and one non-Mafia?0_o wrote:
didn't expect it to be so imbalanced though >_>
You just lost the game.Derekku Chan wrote:
It's just a game :3
yeah wtgBagelBob wrote:
So, in summery, two weeks ago when I woke up and said "I should hammer Suburu."(post saying I'm going to hammer) and went to make a sandwich, I should have hammered Suburu and then gone and made a sandwich. I'm hungry.