Tasha wrote:

Loctav's Oni

12:55 Tasha: just lemme know when you can look
12:56 OnosakiHito: Sure.
13:09 OnosakiHito: okay.
13:10 Tasha: 01:06:514 (56) -
13:11 Tasha: 01:08:414 (76) -
13:11 Tasha: 01:11:264 (102) -
13:11 Tasha: 01:12:213 (111) -
13:12 Tasha: 01:44:826 (357) -
13:12 Tasha: 01:49:575 (6) -
13:13 Tasha: 02:07:306 (161) -
13:13 Tasha: 02:12:056 (206) -
13:13 Tasha: 02:13:005 (216) -
13:13 Tasha: 02:15:222 (238) -
13:14 Tasha: that's pretty much it
13:14 Tasha: i feel like almost every single one I linked a note could be removed before the finisher
13:14 Tasha: and for some of them a finisher is completely unnecessary to begin with
13:16 OnosakiHito: I feel the same.
13:16 OnosakiHito: And it doesn't look appealing
13:17 OnosakiHito: First note stamp for example
13:17 OnosakiHito: the whole pattern doesn't actually exist in the song, it's rather two-plet or something like that.
13:17 OnosakiHito: 01:06:435 (55) - doesn't have a significant sound.
13:18 OnosakiHito: And sounds without note (55) in my opinion, better.
13:19 Tasha: its pretty much like that for every finisher i listed
13:19 OnosakiHito: Indeed.
13:19 Tasha: it sounds better if you remove the note just before them
13:19 Tasha: maybe one or two exceptions
13:19 Tasha: anyways i'm just gonna post this so I have someone backing me up on it
13:19 OnosakiHito: Sure.

For the notes listed there, I highly suggest you remove the note before them as mentioned. I have no issue with the map other than the finisher usage in the places mentioned. My explanation for this is in the spoilerbox above.

BeatofIke wrote:

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:28:520 (70,72) - I would suggest a big don here, since it emphasizes better with the lower bell sounds. The big notes itself are already emphasizing the brass sounds. I do understand that the pitch of brass is increasing which you may have used to emphasize this part, so this suggestion is completely optional. If suggested, you can replace the big kat at 00:58:915 (148) with a big don.
2. 01:16:963 (215,216) - If you want, you can add two notes (preferably kats) between these notes. It adds full emphasis with the main/prominent sounds and it sounds more complete. It would also be consistent with 01:18:863 (217,218,219,220) as both share similar sounds. Hm, sounds fine but i dont want it,because the kats are added on high pitched parts. I would make those "d" as "d k" as i did before but i wanted a crescent amount of notes.
3. 01:48:625 (316,317,318,319,320) - As Stefan mentioned already (since I do agree with him), this short don stream is a bit too fast considering the high BPM. Please consider removing the blue tick (1/4) notes in that stream (or use a drum roll even). Same applies to 01:56:224 (348,349,350,351,352) and 02:00:024 (367,368,369,370,371). An alternate solution would be to replace these streams with drum rolls.3 mentions to this ,so ok,ill put drumrolls

Lucas_Ve wrote:

how can bullcrap like that get ranked... sorry but this map didn't deserve to be ranked