Nope, I'm last to confirm. :]Wojjan wrote:
If I got it right, I'm the last to confirm. So I will.
/confirm
let the RVS begin
Vote Wojian for lying. ^^ haha
Nope, I'm last to confirm. :]Wojjan wrote:
If I got it right, I'm the last to confirm. So I will.
/confirm
let the RVS begin
Serious vote here.Wojjan wrote:
vote: Echo for lying
...no wait, we need him here to win
rawr.Wojjan wrote:
FOS: thepianist for getting ninja'd =P
#forumshitthepianist wrote:
anyways i need to subscribe to this thread and this post will do nicely.
You'll be getting LOTS of emails then XPthepianist wrote:
rawr.Wojjan wrote:
FOS: thepianist for getting ninja'd =P
anyways i need to subscribe to this thread and this post will do nicely.
thepianist wrote:
Nope, I'm last to confirm. :]Wojjan wrote:
If I got it right, I'm the last to confirm. So I will.
/confirm
let the RVS begin
Vote Wojian for lying. ^^ haha
You'rerust45 wrote:
Your lying and I can tell. No one would just go out and say that they were the Mafia Roleblocker.
I think so.adam2046 wrote:
So uh...Rust and Lucidity for mafia?
That does seem very plausible.Echo wrote:
Vote: Lucidity
Claiming Mafia is clearly WIFOM.
This post is interesting for two reasons:adam2046 wrote:
So uh...Rust and Lucidity for mafia?
Wojjan was in Mafia 3 as well where a quick bandwagon vote resulted in a vanilla townie getting killed...Clearly he knows that voting that fast doesn't end well. Why would he encourage the same behavior here? Simple: He knows I'm not mafia and wants to get an easy lynch that benefits the mafia.Wojjan wrote:
Let's score a majority then, if he'll get lynched anyway. No point in waiting for 2 more days for the deadline to kick in
Vote Lucidity to move things along
You're very committed to get rid of me, aren't you?: ) How can you have such strong convictions so early in the game? Unless you're privy to information that the rest of us aren't. Information that a member of the mafia would have?adam2046 wrote:
So if Lucidity is jester, it's in the mafia's best interests to NK her tonight (since the jester loses that way) if she's still alive tomorrow I will lynch her. (and I strongly urge everyone else to do so aswell)
Exactly my point...You're trying to create a situation where I have to be disposed of, whether I'm the Jester or not. If everyone doesn't agree to your plan to lynch me on Day 2 the mafia has no motivation to kill me on Night 1. Furthermore, who says there's even a Jester in the game? Like I said before, you're way too confident in your claims to not be suspicious. It looks like you're trying to lock in a non-mafia lynch to me.adam2046 wrote:
If you're the jester it's in the mafia's best interests to kill you off tonight because I would like everyone to lynch you tomorrow.
You see, if you're the jester everyone else loses if you're lynched including the mafia, so if we create a situation where we lynch you tomorrow no matter what the mafia would have to kill you first in order to win.
Oh come on;p Everyone was joking around (still are). Using WIFOM as a basis for voting is silly. There's absolutely no justification for using that, except paranoia. Or maybe trying to mislead others.adam2046 wrote:
If you're the roleblocker (I saw no jest in your claim) you will still be alive tomorrow, and we will lynch you (hopefully)
If you are jester, then your behaviour could have been banking on the fact that no one here knows about the jester role (since there are no role lists this game).Lucidity wrote:
Have you considered that if I actually were the Jester that I wouldn't make it that obvious? Roleclaim mafia to get voted and then vote for myself? And don't give me that WIFOM crap
By proving my innocence? haha ;p You and Wojjan are so suspicious -.-adam2046 wrote:
You're killing me here Subi ...
Mod: Could you post a list of all the kind of roles that could possibly be in here? What's the overall list you're working from? There are many different game setups out there :O For instance if I've played a game with an elf character who has this and that ability, but no one else has played with that char before they wouldn't know about it...LadySuburu wrote:
1: ANY kind of role could be in this game, and the roles are unknown.
Sorry, but no. With the roles being unknown, someone could claim any role with any power. After that, it'll be up to you to believe them or not. Of course, any actual actions that are done have to be within the scope of your powers, but you can claim to be able to do whatever you want. inb4postclaimingtobeabletodowhatevertheywantLucidity wrote:
Mod: Could you post a list of all the kind of roles that could possibly be in here? What's the overall list you're working from? There are many different game setups out there :O For instance if I've played a game with an elf character who has this and that ability, but no one else has played with that char before they wouldn't know about it...
So a list that specifies all the possible roles so everyone's on the same page would be great
Roles aren't specified anywhere...Nice try though.adam2046 wrote:
Mafia are not allowed to discuss until nightime.
The first quote is WIFOM, while the second is condemning WIFOM.Lucidity wrote:
Where ? :<Echo wrote:
Lucidity wrote:
Have you considered that if I actually were the Jester that I wouldn't make it that obvious? Roleclaim mafia to get voted and then vote for myself?I sense inconsistency.Lucidity wrote:
Using WIFOM as a basis for voting is silly. There's absolutely no justification for using that, except paranoia. Or maybe trying to mislead others.
Would you please stop saying WIFOM, I think the entire point of this post was to see how many times you could say WIFOM in one post.Lucidity wrote:
I completely agree with that. And yet all the votes against me are based on WIFOM?
At times like these Ockham's razor jumps to mind.
I guess you could call the first quote WIFOM. It is also condemning WIFOM though. I'm saying that I would not use such an obvious WIFOM strategy, since WIFOM isn't any basis to vote on. I wouldn't expect anyone in the game to vote based on WIFOM. There's also the rather large inconsistency of voting for myself before I got close to being lynched. A Jester would not do that.
Simplicity. "Joking around" is the simplest explanation for my actions, and from a neutral perspective has to be the most likely reason for them.
Why should townies not vote for themselves even as a joke? Other than getting the WIFOM fanatics all fired up, there's no logical "sinister plan" that accompanies such a vote, is there?adam2046 wrote:
So anyway if you had read my posts in the other thread I told everyone that I found anyone who voted themselves suspicious on the grounds that humans should not vote themselves even as a joke.
>_> Regardless, there's no point at all to claim mafia other than to joke around or be stupid. Or unless one really is mafia and just doesn't want to play but then fuck them for signing up in the first place XPEcho wrote:
Lucidity wrote:
The Jester wouldn't vote for himself at any other stage than L-1 though.What are these quotes called again? Starts with W, ends with M, etc., etc.Derekku Chan wrote:
Mafia wouldn't be stupid enough to roleclaim themselves.
This compound sentence can easily be broken down into two partsWojjan wrote:
I think the town won't buy your show and if the Mafia doesn't get you, we WILL.
does more to spur on discussion than suppress it. Wojjan here is putting the pressure on Lucidity. This vote makes end-of-day-lynching Lucidity possible, forcing Lucidity to post more.Wojjan wrote:
Let's score a majority then, if he'll get lynched anyway. No point in waiting for 2 more days for the deadline to kick in. Vote Lucidity to move things along
I've quoted every post I've referenced...BagelBob wrote:
@Lucidity:
You accuse without evidence. Quote, or at least link to the posts where you accuse people of committing <Action>.
I think he was confused because he's used to the smaller mafia games, where it's 5 to lynch on day 1. I guess he had 4 votes on him when he said that.BagelBob wrote:
@Wojjan
Can you explain why you thought you were at L-1?
For you, Echo...Echo wrote:
strager please explain your "serious vote" for those less gifted among us
What?DeathxShinigami wrote:
And Farewell Wojjan.
I lol'd.Lucidity wrote:
I've quoted every post I've referenced...BagelBob wrote:
@Lucidity:
You accuse without evidence. Quote, or at least link to the posts where you accuse people of committing <Action>.
You seem to have a very formulaic approach to the game. Are there really absolute "laws" in this game?
Unvote
Vote: Wojjan.
Still got mah eye on you adam ;p
First, you're defending adam for him.strager wrote:
adam's decision to vote for Lucidity D2 if he isn't NK'd N1 is this:
Mafia want to be the only ones who win. They don't want a Jester to win. Also, if Lucidity turns up a Townie, that's still good news for them.
If Lucidity is a Mafia, he wouldn't be NK'd except in some strange universe. Thus, he would be alive for D2, thus resulting in a lynch by this reasoning.
Of course, there's some WIFOM involved (sorry).
How is that a Mafia action?JInxyjem wrote:
I lol'd.
You knew wojjan was 1 vote higher than you so when Bagel evened out the votes, you decided to up wojjan a notch by voting for him. Mafia, no?
As if I weren't posting enough already? I don't think he needed to *nudge* me to post more at all. Furthermore, he was part of Newbie Mafia 3 on these forums where such a bandwagon vote occurred, which was not beneficial to the townies at all. Why would he make the same mistake again.BagelBob wrote:
In addition, I feel thatdoes more to spur on discussion than suppress it. Wojjan here is putting the pressure on Lucidity. This vote makes end-of-day-lynching Lucidity possible, forcing Lucidity to post more.Wojjan wrote:
Let's score a majority then, if he'll get lynched anyway. No point in waiting for 2 more days for the deadline to kick in. Vote Lucidity to move things along
As I said in my previous post, I don't have all the time in the world. Please do take a look at the initial Day 1 posts. ALL of them are pretty much joke posts, are they not? Vote for grammar nazi. Roleclaim: Team Rocket Grunt. etc. I think it's quite clear to see without quoting 20 posts.BagelBob wrote:
Can you produce any of these posts or people?Lucidity wrote:
None of this makes any sense, does it? Maybe it's because it's taken out of context. If you look at my Roleclaim, it was surrounded by other joke posts from every person in the thread.