recheck log: add lead-in 0.5s
bubble~
bubble~
forum
nao - Dimension Tripper!!!! [Taiko]
posted
Total Posts
45
CDFA wrote:
haha you guys
title一个有PV一个没PV大丈夫?Flask wrote:
CDFA wrote:
haha you guys
Isn't it supposed to be (PV Ver.)? http://osu.ppy.sh/s/91963
The ranked set has that title, and this did come from the PV for the anime, not the (TV Size), or full version.
Also you ranked the set with (PV Ver.) so is that correct or no? I might need to change the title on my set if it is wrong. lol.
The ranked set has that title, and this did come from the PV for the anime, not the (TV Size), or full version.
Also you ranked the set with (PV Ver.) so is that correct or no? I might need to change the title on my set if it is wrong. lol.
http://nep-anime.tv/special.html The PV ver. is not necessary.
[Oni]
00:01:043 - This part still sounds too soft to me, and S100% would be better. This applies to all diff.
00:10:766 - the d on the second tick sounds odd as the melody still goes in a 1/2 way where the kdk-- is opposing it. kkddd might fit there better.
00:12:041 - the song does not repeat in an obvious way --- so we can use sth else in the third ddk like kkd k d d k, like what you've done in the coming phrase.
In overall fluent, the only thing I would like to mention is the finishing in the kiai time --- like 01:02:095 - --- doesn't sound as strong as the rest.
[Kantan]
01:31:425 - Separating the notes equally makes it easier (since this is kantan) so I will prefer moving this one 1/2 eariler.
I still think the overall hitsound being a bit too soft, probably becoz the song is louder than average. Other than that, it's fine and ready.
[Oni]
00:01:043 - This part still sounds too soft to me, and S100% would be better. This applies to all diff.
00:10:766 - the d on the second tick sounds odd as the melody still goes in a 1/2 way where the kdk-- is opposing it. kkddd might fit there better.
00:12:041 - the song does not repeat in an obvious way --- so we can use sth else in the third ddk like kkd k d d k, like what you've done in the coming phrase.
In overall fluent, the only thing I would like to mention is the finishing in the kiai time --- like 01:02:095 - --- doesn't sound as strong as the rest.
[Kantan]
01:31:425 - Separating the notes equally makes it easier (since this is kantan) so I will prefer moving this one 1/2 eariler.
I still think the overall hitsound being a bit too soft, probably becoz the song is louder than average. Other than that, it's fine and ready.
There's a ranked version (that the mapper ranked, at that), and a bubbled version with PV. There's no harm in including it, so why not include it for consistency? (This is after discussion in #lounge as well.)
While this is true, the video doesn't include a hint of PV Ver. in the title of the song.dkun wrote:
There's a ranked version (that the mapper ranked, at that), and a bubbled version with PV. There's no harm in including it, so why not include it for consistency? (This is after discussion in #lounge as well.)
Is there any source that can prove that?
would you call this the full version?
No, but either way, the video states it as Dimension tripper!!!!dkun wrote:
would you call this the full version?
But well, probably it might be better to keep consistency with the already ranked version.
Consistency is better than no consistency!
Also same post count! o.o
Also same post count! o.o
Topic Starter
From ranking criteria:
@MMzz
I ranked that set with that title because the rule had not been finalized that time.
Do not alter the song's title. This includes adding any marker to describe the cut of the song such as "Short Ver.", "TV Size" and so forth unless those markers are part of the official song title as listed by a reputable source.(PV Ver.) isn't officially released, that's why I didn't add it.
@MMzz
I ranked that set with that title because the rule had not been finalized that time.
wmfchris wrote:
http://nep-anime.tv/special.html The PV ver. is not necessary.
[Oni]
00:01:043 - This part still sounds too soft to me, and S100% would be better. This applies to all diff. //100% is too strong imo, so i set the volume to 70% instead.
00:10:766 - the d on the second tick sounds odd as the melody still goes in a 1/2 way where the kdk-- is opposing it. kkddd might fit there better. //changed it to kkddk
00:12:041 - the song does not repeat in an obvious way --- so we can use sth else in the third ddk like kkd k d d k, like what you've done in the coming phrase. //did some adjustment on it.
In overall fluent, the only thing I would like to mention is the finishing in the kiai time --- like 01:02:095 - --- doesn't sound as strong as the rest.
[Kantan]
01:31:425 - Separating the notes equally makes it easier (since this is kantan) so I will prefer moving this one 1/2 eariler. //alright.
I still think the overall hitsound being a bit too soft, probably becoz the song is louder than average. Other than that, it's fine and ready.
Is it too late if i want to make a guest diff :$
wmfchris is dead ;w;
rebubble
rebubble
於是我來看了~
[
Kantan]
[
Futsu]
[
Muzukashii]
[
Oni]
沒什麼大問題 叫我吧可以獻出我的第一次我覺得 xDDD
[
- 00:08:375 (10) - 不移動到00:08:535 - 用D嗎?
- 00:18:577 (27) - 同上
- 00:47:270 - 這裡我會選擇加個d 然後把00:47:908 (78) - 刪除掉
- 00:48:705 (80) - k可以跟著音樂我覺得~
- 01:14:847 - 考慮加個Circle?
[
- Well done
[
- 00:14:751 (76) - 用d可以更明顯襯托出後面的k
- 00:24:953 (135,136) - Switch?
- 00:27:504 (148) - 我喜歡這個空掉刪除這個note
- 00:57:472 (312) - d的話有漸層的效果
[
- 00:27:504 (178) - 喜歡空掉~
- 00:28:301 (180,181,182) - dkd?
- 00:54:363 (110) - 考慮刪除?
沒什麼大問題 叫我吧
Topic Starter
Thanks~bossandy wrote:
於是我來看了~
[
- 00:08:375 (10) - 不移動到00:08:535 - 用D嗎? //移到那邊就有點confused了.
- 00:18:577 (27) - 同上 //^
- 00:47:270 - 這裡我會選擇加個d 然後把00:47:908 (78) - 刪除掉 //我這樣做呢, 是想避免1.5spacing
- 00:48:705 (80) - k可以跟著音樂我覺得~ //這樣就有點難了- -
- 01:14:847 - 考慮加個Circle? okay~
[
- Well done
[
- 00:14:751 (76) - 用d可以更明顯襯托出後面的k //kat for fitting drum.
- 00:24:953 (135,136) - Switch? //deleted that note instead.
- 00:27:504 (148) - 我喜歡這個空掉刪除這個note //ok
- 00:57:472 (312) - d的話有漸層的效果 //okay~
[
- 00:27:504 (178) - 喜歡空掉~ //okay
- 00:28:301 (180,181,182) - dkd? //Ithink ddk can emphasize the drum sound there, so no change here.
- 00:54:363 (110) - 考慮刪除? //okay
沒什麼大問題 叫我吧可以獻出我的第一次我覺得xDDD
After discussing , we are supposed to change the title to Dimension Tripper!!!! because of this
So , here it is!!
Ranked!!
So , here it is!!
Ranked!!
Uhh, I don't find it reasonable to have the same song ranked with different titles :<
Well, if everything is fine then it's good, gratz ~
Well, if everything is fine then it's good, gratz ~
I know this is a little late, but that image just contains a stylized version of the title as a logo - and nothing more.
The song name is indeed with a lowercase t, as indicated in various official sources.
While I realize this is a little late, I want to make this point now so that the same thing doesn't happen in future mapsets for this song (it is rather popular)
As you can see on the final album scan, there is indeed the "Dimension Tripper" logo, however it is just a stylized version of the title. The true title is stated below in the tracklist, containing a lowercase t and four exclamation points.
The song name is indeed with a lowercase t, as indicated in various official sources.
While I realize this is a little late, I want to make this point now so that the same thing doesn't happen in future mapsets for this song (it is rather popular)
As you can see on the final album scan, there is indeed the "Dimension Tripper" logo, however it is just a stylized version of the title. The true title is stated below in the tracklist, containing a lowercase t and four exclamation points.
Oh... It is really shocked me , sorry for this mistake...