1. Easy (1,31 stars, 111 notes)
2. Fantasie (3,62 stars, 316 notes)
3. Hard (2,73 stars, 230 notes)
4. Mk's Normal (1,9 stars, 155 notes)

WARNING

Zolixe wrote:

modding time

An overall explanation to the following reply: 2k16 is built around emphasis. A lot of emphasis. This means that certain instruments, drums, sounds, vocals, you name it, get accentuated with jumps or different spacing from normal distant snap (DS). If you go through all of the examples that you states, you will notice how they have specific arrangements or have larger jumps (i mostly used 2,0 DS) to emphasise certain sounds. I also used quite a lot of anti-jumps to complement the style I was aiming for in this mapset. Slightly misleading but repetitive so it's easy to look through.

Hard

Hard

Suddenly... Issues...

00:01:633 (2,3) - This jump is too sudden Emphasis. Vocal is slightly more pitched.
I feel like I get used to the jumps, but I was not expecting it, since i thought the slider was going the opposite way

00:03:566 (1) - *First glance* My mind says no, but since it keeps repeating, it feels like you can make it work Ye it's my style. I tend to use weird slider shapes ^^

00:08:011 (3,4) - This jump is also weird, it breaks the flow when playing It doesn't. It's arranged to create natural flow which is also a double loop. http://puu.sh/t6duj/216304e9ec.jpg

00:12:456 (3,1) - Timing/Spacing does not match up between those two, and I get confused This is supposed to be a build up for the next section of the song that is much different than to the introduction. It's why I stacked it.
*00:18:640 (3,1) - example of a better spacing*

00:13:422 (2,3,4) - Clicked them in wrong order cause I learned early on that near object should come first Yes, it's an anti-jump. I placed them in correct order an flipped them to creates jump fitting to the music. In this case, the synths. That's also why I didn't place them here 00:17:094 (3,4) - since at this point, the synths are not that intense.
Does repeat, so you get used to it when playing the map some time

00:31:202 (5,1,2,3) - the sliders should maybe go the other direction, since I get confused where to start, when the endpoint is closest Emphasis again. Really strong synths.
*00:34:101 (2,3,4) - this repeats more often, so I'm used to it

00:42:218 (1,2) - this is fine
00:42:605 (2,3,4,1,2,3) - this is not, I get confused cause there has been good flow, but I siddenly have to stop alot Totally don't see a problem here. It's a stop-go movement.

00:46:277 (3,4) - slider facing the opposite way confuses me Same like the circles (anti-jumps) they are reversed to represent the synths better. No jump this time tho as they are not strong.

01:10:048 (1,2) - This seems empty compared to how you focused on smaller beats in the rest of the map, add a circle in between maybe? I wanted to map this part very slow paced due to the vocal and synths being slow too. There are also no strong beats, which leads to.. 01:15:266 (4,5,6,7,8,9) - that's a build up to when the next section gets strong beats again.



moving on...

Fantasia

Fantasia

00:00:667 (2,3,1,2,1,2) and 00:01:826 (4,5) - Sliders seem too random That's called a blanket. When sliders are shaped around other slider's shapes or slider end's.
Doing pairs like; 00:01:826 (4,5), 00:12:842 (1,2), 00:14:388 (1,2) seem to work just fine

00:39:706 (2,3,4,5,6) and 00:45:310 (1,2,3,4,5), 00:46:663 (7,1,2,3,4,5) - seem very out of style, since the start was very heavy on sliders
*It fits the song, I just don't think it fits with the style of the start of the map*

00:51:783 (2,3) - what
00:53:330 (2,3) - what
00:54:586 (1,2) - what
00:56:035 (4,1,2) - what
00:57:968 (2,3) - here im starting to adapt to the new style
*I don't think it fits very well, either use it more earlier or change it*

01:03:863 (1,2,3,4) - I was lucky I had good reaction time to figure this out

01:10:821 (5,6) - maybe too much freestyle on the sliders. Try more simple ones No. That's exactly the style I was aiming for

01:13:140 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - because I didn't play the song before, I died in this section. It's a very fast change in amount of click, compared to the rest of the map.
*I think you should change it, but I figure that you probably can't come up with something more simple for this section with many beats* Ye, but once you get the hang of it it makes total sense. It's also accordingly mapped to the song. It also creates a build up and transition from the weak to strong section.
[/size]

Really nice map, keep up the good work

1. 00:52:847 (3,4) - I feel like these two circles are too high and too straight for the flow. You should consider maybe lowering those two and curving them to follow a great flow with the previous slider.
2. 00:54:393 (6) - This one should be moved to x:204 y:296 for a consistent spacing and a better straight line.
3. 00:59:032 (3) - For the same reason as above, this one should be moved to x:401 y:60

1. 00:12:842 (1,2) - Just move this slider a little bit at the left, it's going to improve the blanket.
2. 00:19:027 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - I know we are in 2017 and this was mapped way before, but would you mind doing something else here? You literally copy/pasted one of the previous combos that was there 8 seconds ago. A little diversity would be better!
3. 00:36:613 (2) - You should consider moving this circle some grids down because it is straight with the previous slider's end but then, the next slider is under this circle. Just to improve the "flow" a bit, it would be better if you move it down. Do the same thing for the next kiai also.

Gabe wrote:

oh my god. this is french.

[General]
What about a silent slidertrack? It feels quite loud :/ Ye true. Added
Nightcore skin where? :') We need a new one >w<. The old one is still 4:3

1. 00:01:633 (2,3) - That jump is quite big. The intro is quite calm making this jump quite unexpected. It'd probably be better to remove it, especially since it is the only jump in the intro making it out of place and uncalled for.
2. 00:45:117 - It feels like a circle is missing here considering you are mainly following the vocals (otherwise you'd have a circle at 00:46:083).
3. 00:54:973 (2) - is a clap missing on this circle?
4. 00:54:973 (2) - and here as well?
5. 01:15:556 (6) - I'd would move this circle to 01:15:362. Even if a stream should actually start at 01:15:459, you probably didn't make one because it is a Hard, though having a triple just before helps emphasizing the 3 1/2-circles that follow.
6. 01:46:961 - Same as before.
7. 01:56:817 (2,2) - :3
8. 02:05:514 (3,1) - That jump was unexpected, many players will probably miss this one. I'd recommand changing it to something more appropriate unless you like to make 13-year-olds cry.

Kurai wrote:

[Hard]

1. 00:01:633 (2,3) - That jump is quite big. The intro is quite calm making this jump quite unexpected. It'd probably be better to remove it, especially since it is the only jump in the intro making it out of place and uncalled for. Actually, the whole intro consists of those jumps. The vocal is a bit higher. I'll reduce the spacing tho so the jump won't be as big.
2. 00:54:973 (2) - is a clap missing on this circle? Nope the claps are on every 4th beat in this section. Was intentional
3. 02:05:514 (3,1) - That jump was unexpected, many players will probably miss this one. I'd recommand changing it to something more appropriate unless you like to make 13-year-olds cry. LOL that was an accident. Fixed!

That's some good old mapping you've got here o3o/