o.o
małe kółka ror
małe kółka ror
>_______________________< VGladi wrote:
Star.
This map is awesome.
You are not forced to star mapsBia wrote:
Bitterwanted me toforced me
Ah. I see. must be some little thing in the .osu that is doing that.ShaggoN wrote:
Mapped part of hard difficulty (including breaks) is about 3:48 or something, anyway it's under 4 minutes. I don't know why osu counts it 5 minutes. o_O
[Hard]Alace wrote:
Finally
it`s ranked
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/296scar1410 wrote:
[Hard]Alace wrote:
Finally
it`s ranked
02:48:213 (1) - Ninja spinners are rankable now? Good job.
Wizards in Winter : Oct 29, 2007dNextGen wrote:
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/296
Ranked: Oct 29, 2007dNextGen wrote:
[Hard]
02:48:213 (1) - Ninja spinners are rankable now? Good job.
http://osu.ppy.sh/b/296
this would be great if all maps with ninja spinners could be unranked... really...ShaggoN wrote:
i lol'd badly. if rules are so clear then go ahead and unrank 50% of beatmaps o.O
Perhaps that's because no one is bitching about a single thing? Is anyone complaining about lack of distance spacing on [Insane]+ diffs?Sushi wrote:
The only thing we are saying is regarding the date when the map was ranked. We are not asking for unrank or something. it's just that normally this should hacen't been ranked. I don't want to start a flame or something here, I'm just sayin that.
a 2010 map completely violating a rule. hm. that's what I mean.
For all of you that will say "GO TRAIN ON THAT MAP FOR NINJA SPIN" go away. I'm talking about now, and not about 2008/2007 maps where rules were not so clear.
I'm just surprised that no one even said something about that.
That all~Sushi wrote:
The only thing we are saying is regarding the date when the map was ranked. We are not asking for unrank or something. it's just that normally this should haven't been ranked. I don't want to start a flame or something here, I'm just sayin that.
a 2010 map completely violating a rule. hm. that's what I mean.
For all of you that will say "GO TRAIN ON THAT MAP FOR NINJA SPIN" go away. I'm talking about now, and not about 2008/2007 maps where rules were not so clear.
I'm just surprised that no one even said something about that.
I'm retarded 'cause? I don't cry for every single thing that whole community didn't bitch about since this map is ranked?scar1410 wrote:
Well, this become too long with retard people like Galkan. :/
scar1410 wrote:
btw Galkan, I didn't play this map.
How funny... not. So, from this PoV all that speed ups/downs/jumps/fast spins/etc are 2007-style and unrankable, huh?Sushi wrote:
Galkan. I'm talking as a mapper, not as a player.
If more skill = things that have been declared non-rankable, ok let's get back into 2007 maps. </irony>
What I mean, galkan, is that you're having some non-sense here.
If no one complained, that doesn't mean it is ok.
Be objective and stop having a biased look on this.
and it's not only HIS feeling as s a mapper, because no one pointed it (look who was modding)!. From now on, I will ignore all of your whining posts unless you:ShaggoN wrote:
Anyways, come on...this spin is easy to 300 >_>
ok...then I submit a map now with a ninja spinner ... it's ranked ... and 4 monthes later it's fine ????? *0*yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:
map was ranked like 4 months ago.. submitted a year ago.. why would you even bring this up.. i swear some of you people need to buy a new brain or something
My point is, complain about it then, while its pending. It was submitted a year about, you had a whole year up to 4 months ago to say something about it. Its dumb to attack a map 4 months after its ranked, should we go back and attack all maps in the past that have 1 thing unrankable in it? We might be busy. I will end my argument here.Eirene wrote:
ok...then I submit a map now with a ninja spinner ... it's ranked ... and 4 monthes later it's fine ????? *0*yeahyeahyeahhh wrote:
map was ranked like 4 months ago.. submitted a year ago.. why would you even bring this up.. i swear some of you people need to buy a new brain or something
are you kidding ??
if nobody bring that up, there would be other ninja spinners so... !!!
No, no.James2250 wrote:
Yes the spinner is a bad idea (if makes no difference if you can 300 it or not, its a bad idea), it was missed by modders apprently. Any need to argue for the next few days over it?
Because of "great" warning, it's rankable ? This is the problem...osuplayer111 wrote:
02:48:213 (1) - Well... this spinner is unrankable but you did a great warning! I think it can be ranked anyway, but for this you need more BATs opinions.