forum

Matsumoto Sara - Ito Hakanaki Hikari no Gotoku [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
36
show more
Topic Starter
Diasios
Thanks! :D
MMzz
Solid set, I see nothing wrong, everything plays very nice. Have a bubble.
The Kantan and Futsuu might be on the harder side but I think they still work very well. Not every map can be super easy! :P
Topic Starter
Diasios
Thanks a lot! :)
kanpakyin
Hi.

[General]
  1. Hitsounds are too loud. Some hitsounds covered the music and instrument, thus I would suggest using normal 70% volume.

[Oni]
  1. 00:29:370 (52,53,54) - kdd doesn't fit the music that much. I prefer using ddk to fit the high pitch (white tick) there.
  2. 00:37:236 (110,111,112,113) - Diplets sound weird. The rhythm is quite awkward here. I would suggest changing it into simple 1/2 or even 1/1 and then it should be much better.
  3. 00:55:711 (199,200,201,202,203) - hum...This 5-plet doesn't make any sense in my opinion. It doesn't fit the music at all. This would be better if you can change it to 1/2 or triplet + 1/2
  4. 01:22:236 (355,356,357,358,359,360,361) - ^similar to this. Change this to a 5-plets + 1/2 would be nice.
  5. 01:39:614 (464,465,466) - Same as 00:29:370 -
  6. 01:43:181 (492) - kat here?
  7. 01:47:480 (518,519,520,521) - Again. The diplets rhythm. Would suggest to change it.
  8. 02:07:053 (638) - Change this to kat to fit the instrument behind the music?
  9. The inferior part is much better.

[Muzukashii]
  1. 01:26:626 (299) - How about changing this to big kat because the pitch here is higher than 01:26:260 - so that a big kat can fit the music perfectly.
  2. 02:25:163 (234) - ^
  3. 02:45:650 (46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58) - I'm afraid that this is too hard for muzu level because the big notes are irregular (not placed at white tick) and double k k (1/2 space) with a big don would make confusion to some player.
  4. 03:04:309 (138,139) - How about change these notes to big kat since the pitch of this part is the highest.
  5. 03:28:454 (66,67,68,69,70,71,72) - These finish could be removed. First, they don't really fit the music, they don't fit the atmosphere there, big notes were supposed to be used on accent point. Second, x X x X x X pattern is too hard for muzu diff.

[Futsuu]
  1. 01:22:784 (186) - kat here?
  2. 03:04:309 (508,509) - How about change these notes to big kat since the pitch of this part is the highest.
  3. 03:18:576 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - This 1/2 chain is too long for Futsuu diff. Also the pattern is way too complicated. Change it please.

[Kantan]
  1. 02:05:407 (32) - Change this to kat and then change 02:06:139 (33) - back to don?
  2. 03:26:626 (22,23,24,25,26) - These big notes might be too hard for newbie. Try to fix it please.
Topic Starter
Diasios

kanpakyin wrote:

Hi.

[General]
  1. Hitsounds are too loud. Some hitsounds covered the music and instrument, thus I would suggest using normal 70% volume. Fixed.

[Oni]
  1. 00:29:370 (52,53,54) - kdd doesn't fit the music that much. I prefer using ddk to fit the high pitch (white tick) there. No, mainly because I don't want to have 3 ddk in a row.
  2. 00:37:236 (110,111,112,113) - Diplets sound weird. The rhythm is quite awkward here. I would suggest changing it into simple 1/2 or even 1/1 and then it should be much better. I made this diplets because I want to have a bit of pattern variation.
  3. 00:55:711 (199,200,201,202,203) - hum...This 5-plet doesn't make any sense in my opinion. It doesn't fit the music at all. This would be better if you can change it to 1/2 or triplet + 1/2 Well, same as above.
  4. 01:22:236 (355,356,357,358,359,360,361) - ^similar to this. Change this to a 5-plets + 1/2 would be nice. ^
  5. 01:39:614 (464,465,466) - Same as 00:29:370 - Same thing here as well.
  6. 01:43:181 (492) - kat here? Hmm... no, I don't like it.
  7. 01:47:480 (518,519,520,521) - Again. The diplets rhythm. Would suggest to change it. Same as 00:37:236.
  8. 02:07:053 (638) - Change this to kat to fit the instrument behind the music? Oh, you're right, fixed.
  9. The inferior part is much better.

[Muzukashii]
  1. 01:26:626 (299) - How about changing this to big kat because the pitch here is higher than 01:26:260 - so that a big kat can fit the music perfectly. This big don is on purpose, there are a lot of K here so to have a bit of variation I added a D.
  2. 02:25:163 (234) - ^ ^
  3. 02:45:650 (46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58) - I'm afraid that this is too hard for muzu level because the big notes are irregular (not placed at white tick) and double k k (1/2 space) with a big don would make confusion to some player. Hmm... well, I could do this to make this pattern a bit easier but I don't really like it, the current pattern actually fit the song.
  4. 03:04:309 (138,139) - How about change these notes to big kat since the pitch of this part is the highest. Done.
  5. 03:28:454 (66,67,68,69,70,71,72) - These finish could be removed. First, they don't really fit the music, they don't fit the atmosphere there, big notes were supposed to be used on accent point. Second, x X x X x X pattern is too hard for muzu diff. To be honest I think this pattern fits the song a lot, also I don't think it's too hard for a muzu, it's a pretty basic pattern.

[Futsuu]
  1. 01:22:784 (186) - kat here? Ok.
  2. 03:04:309 (508,509) - How about change these notes to big kat since the pitch of this part is the highest. Done.
  3. 03:18:576 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14) - This 1/2 chain is too long for Futsuu diff. Also the pattern is way too complicated. Change it please. I want to have higher density here, I know that this is a bit hard for a Futsuu but this is actually what I want.

[Kantan]
  1. 02:05:407 (32) - Change this to kat and then change 02:06:139 (33) - back to don? I want to have a bit of variation here. (02:01:748 (27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36) - d k d k d d k kkd)
  2. 03:26:626 (22,23,24,25,26) - These big notes might be too hard for newbie. Try to fix it please. Meh, I could delete some dons here to make things easier but I don't like the result, also I don't want to remove these big notes, they really fit here.

Thanks! :)
kanpakyin
Ranked.

(ノ・ω・)ノ
Lanturn
Grats on the rank!

Good song for me to practice my horrible Taiko skills with :P
alacat
(ノ・ω・)ノ congrats
Nemis
Gratz *-*
Topic Starter
Diasios
Andrea
Grats on rank (:
Mayzel
Ito Hakanaki You no Gotoku
だと思いますがね
asgardv

Mayzel wrote:

Ito Hakanaki You no Gotoku
だと思いますがね
Yes. How to read of song name is wrong.
Topic Starter
Diasios
Uh... "いと儚き燿の如く" is the correct title afaik, just google it and you'll find tons of result which lead to this song, same for romanised title.
KSHR

xxheroxx wrote:

Uh... "いと儚き燿の如く" is the correct title afaik, just google it and you'll find tons of result which lead to this song, same for romanised title.
"いと儚き燿の如く" is read "Ito Hakanaki You no Gotoku" as Mayzel wrote.
Since Google translator sometimes makes an error in reading, you had better ask your Japanese friends once.
Topic Starter
Diasios
Use google and search "Ito Hakanaki You no Gotoku" and "Itou Bouki you no Gotoku", as you can see searching "Ito Hakanaki You no Gotoku" gives basically 0 infos about this song even if you say that is the correct translation of "いと儚き燿の如く", I don't speak japanese that well so I'm not 100% sure about it but I think that's unlikely that all these sites I checked are wrong, I know that you are japanese but... meh, I don't know. :?
Cyril Scarlet
itoubouki loool
Suzully
No, it should be "Ito Hakanaki Hikari no Gotoku".
燿 should be read Hikari in this case.
Pokie
Sorry xxheroxx, but I've to unrank it for now >_<

Confirmed Ito Hakanaki Hikari no Gotoku as the correct title, I can rerank it real quick if you've do changes.

More feedback:

SPOILER
いと = Itou

いと = Ito - Correct
--
儚 = bou
き = ki
儚き =/= ぼうき = bouki

儚き = はかなき = Hakanaki - Correct
--
ようの = you no (conjunction)

燿の = Hikari no (noun) - Correct
Topic Starter
Diasios
Alright, fixed!
Pokie
o3o/
Topic Starter
Diasios
Thanks! :D
Loooctav
Congratz~!!
Please sign in to reply.

New reply