Guest
home
beatmaps
rankings
community
store
help
forum
  1. Forums
  2. Beatmaps
  3. Mapping Discussion
  4. Ranking Criteria
  5. Finalized/Denied Amendments

[Proposal] Have the BN expectations apply to the NAT

posted
Total Posts
7
Xinnoh
Elite Mapper
1,962 posts
Joined April 2014
Topic Starter
Xinnoh
help/wiki/People/The_Team/Beatmap_Nominators/Expectations

It would be unreasonable to not require the NAT to follow the guidelines that they enforce for BNs.
Adding the following line seems like a reasonable addition:
"With exception to modding regularly, these expectations also apply to the NAT"
Dialect
1,535 posts
Joined May 2018
Dialect
gotta agree a bit, but nats aren't really bns per se. they lead the bns and give them evaluations.

nats could have some expectation to mod regularly and maybe even nominate maps (although not to the same extent as bns because nats do other work), but it depends
Noffy
Nomination Assessment Team
1,685 posts
Joined April 2012
Noffy
it's always been the case that basically anywhere BN or full BN is mentioned just implicitly includes NAT members too, aside from activity requirements which are a bit different due to NAT members having additional responsibilities.
Last edited by Noffy , edited 2 times in total.
Xinnoh
Elite Mapper
1,962 posts
Joined April 2014
Topic Starter
Xinnoh
o ya agreed on that, would be kinda silly to put that line on both there and the general bng rules page.

the plan b would be to change the nat page to state that rules applicable to the bng apply to the nat, with exception to activity and other specific rules if mentioned. makes more sense.

help/wiki/People/The_Team/Nomination_Assessment_Team
chowch
43 posts
Joined February 2018
chowch

Noffy wrote:

it's always been the case that basically anywhere BN or full BN is mentioned just implicitly includes NAT members too, aside from activity requirements which are a bit different due to NAT members having additional responsibilities.
having this explicitly written somewhere would help to clarify this stance. when it comes to usergroup responsibilities, i feel it would be best to be as clear as possible. i'm a fan of sinnoh's plan b.
quila
358 posts
Joined February 2016
quila
the plan b would be to change the nat page to state that rules applicable to the bng apply to the nat, with exception to activity and other specific rules if mentioned. makes more sense.
this seems like a good idea to me ^^
Noffy
Nomination Assessment Team
1,685 posts
Joined April 2012
Noffy
I have now made a pr https://github.com/ppy/osu-wiki/pull/4338

edit: it's been merged, so archiving this thread!
Last edited by Noffy , edited 1 time in total.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply

0
1 / 7