forum

Are scalies furries?

posted
Total Posts
14
Topic Starter
Jonarwhal
like do furries claim scalies and vice versa?
narwhal is a mammal so it's more similar to a cat than a reptile q.e.d.
z0z
what even is considered a "furry"?
and what are scalies
Nuuskamuikkunen
furry hater

z0z wrote:

what even is considered a "furry"?
and what are scalies
reptile furries
Lenko
No, one has scales the other has fur idiot.
Zelzatter Zero

Lenko wrote:

No, one has scales the other has fur idiot.
OP didn't bring this up for nothing dude. Most of the time we say furries we're including scalies too, but scalies are still a legitimate group of people who likes scales animals.
DeletedUser_5153421
am scurry
Topic Starter
Jonarwhal

icytors wrote:

am scurry
furry + scalie = 2 scurry 4 me
SamStarfish2013
scalies are absolutely not furries.
Topic Starter
Jonarwhal

SamStarfish2013 wrote:

scalies are absolutely not furries.
this thread is overdue and you are in the minority.
the furriest of furries are still claiming scalies here, and I haven't met a scalie yet
you're either a scalie who is gatekeeping (ew)
or neither of them (ewwwwwww /s)
SamStarfish2013
I am literally a closet furry scalies =////= furries
Topic Starter
Jonarwhal
stop gatekeeping :<
z0z
i don't have scales or fur so i'm not in the scope of this argument
johnmedina999
That's like asking, "Are people who like VTubers weeaboos?" or "Are all squares rectangles?" The answer, in my opinion, is that the first is a (strict) subset of the other, meaning that the former consists in the set of people that belong to the latter, and that there are people belonging to the latter set that do not belong in the former set, and that there are possibly many other subsets in the latter set; in short, yes.

Errata: the first analogy was make with a west-centric mindset; yes, I know that Japanese can't be weeaboos by definition, so they would be part of the set of people who like VTubers but aren't in the set of weeaboos, therefore invalidating my analogy. Please ignore this fact and take it with a grain of salt; my second analogy still holds, however.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply