IMO doubles are not only uncomfortable to play, but also ruining value of snares (as your forced to click both: quite almost unnoticeble drum sound on blue tick and loud and clear snare. wdym by arrange notes on playfield?WitherMite wrote:
whats wrong with doubles? plus based on how you have the sliders leading into some of the blue ticks with drums those will feel like a triple anyway. and most of the other rhythms are dense enough that if you really don't want doubles you could probably arrange the notes on the playfield so that there aren't doubles.
also, that placeholder stack is hilarious: 00:41:672 - turn on stacking in the view options for a laugh.
sry, now that I think about it that makes no sense, idk what i was talking about, but I still don't see the point in trying to avoid doubles. Those drums really aren't that quiet and not mapping them at all is imo worse than the cons of doubles, but then again I alternate so doubles aren't uncomfortable. If you really dont want doubles though, it might be fine, but you should fix the timing at the beginning, none of the notes are snapped.illlidan wrote:
wdym by arrange notes on playfield?
they're snapped, but first are 1/3. what about general object choice then?WitherMite wrote:
sry, now that I think about it that makes no sense, idk what i was talking about, but I still don't see the point in trying to avoid doubles. Those drums really aren't that quiet and not mapping them at all is imo worse than the cons of doubles, but then again I alternate so doubles aren't uncomfortable. If you really dont want doubles though, it might be fine, but you should fix the timing at the beginning, none of the notes are snapped.illlidan wrote:
wdym by arrange notes on playfield?
Idk why I didn't realize that, I feel dumb now, though the green lines and bookmarks def aren't snapped, probably why I didn't think to check that, you should at least resnap the green lines. I think your object choice is probably ok, you may be able to find something that will let you get the blue ticks without doubles if you really tried, but idk.illlidan wrote:
they're snapped, but first are 1/3. what about general object choice then?
That's shit reason. Most mappers deal with triples with sliders like that most of the time, and you can just represent the snares with clap hitsound. I have no problem with you having your own rhythm choice, but simply denying doubles just because it feels uncomfortable to play is ridiculous. It's not anything too controversial and you can see them in ranked maps most of the time.illlidan wrote:
IMO doubles are not only uncomfortable to play, but also ruining value of snares (as your forced to click both: quite almost unnoticeble drum sound on blue tick and loud and clear snare. wdym by arrange notes on playfield?WitherMite wrote:
whats wrong with doubles? plus based on how you have the sliders leading into some of the blue ticks with drums those will feel like a triple anyway. and most of the other rhythms are dense enough that if you really don't want doubles you could probably arrange the notes on the playfield so that there aren't doubles.
also, that placeholder stack is hilarious: 00:41:672 - turn on stacking in the view options for a laugh.
yeah you shouldn't heavily sacrifice musical representation for playability.Zelzatter Zero wrote:
That's shit reason. Most mappers deal with triples with sliders like that most of the time, and you can just represent the snares with clap hitsound. I have no problem with you having your own rhythm choice, but simply denying doubles just because it feels uncomfortable to play is ridiculous. It's not anything too controversial and you can see them in ranked maps most of the time.illlidan wrote:
IMO doubles are not only uncomfortable to play, but also ruining value of snares (as your forced to click both: quite almost unnoticeble drum sound on blue tick and loud and clear snare. wdym by arrange notes on playfield?WitherMite wrote:
whats wrong with doubles? plus based on how you have the sliders leading into some of the blue ticks with drums those will feel like a triple anyway. and most of the other rhythms are dense enough that if you really don't want doubles you could probably arrange the notes on the playfield so that there aren't doubles.
also, that placeholder stack is hilarious: 00:41:672 - turn on stacking in the view options for a laugh.
Sacrificing musical representation over playability should be up to the mapper. I myself map based on how I want fingers to move instead of strictly following music. So long as the map is following the general sounds/noise, it can be ok.Asphyre wrote:
you heard them. what u stated were pure subjective... i love doubles thats why... dont ever sacrifice musical representation over playability, like... ever...