I Can Be Wrong But I Think The Most Common Resolutions For UltraWide Are 2560×1080, 3440×1440, 5120×2160; In My Case I Use 2560x1080.Matt2e2 wrote:
Im getting very mixed feelings about fixing this issue, since it seems every ultrawide manufacturer has a different opinion on what 21:9 should be. as in 2560x1080 is barely not 21:9, instead something like 64:27, or 3440x1440 which is 43:18._Augusto_ wrote:
Same Issue, Still Waiting :\
My question to you and anyone else that uses 21:9 is which resolution would be best to compromise for? which one is the most common res in the ultrawide community? since i couldnt find anything concrete.
For now, sorry for the annoyance, ive never used 21:9 in my life so i just assumed every ultrawide stuck to that aspect ratio. i thought 2560x1080 was just an outlier lol
As For What Is The Most Common Among Them I'm Really Not Sure, I Haven't Seen As many Monitors With 5120x2160 As I Have Seen With 2560×1080 Or 3440×1440, But That Probably Can Vary.
I'm Thinking Maybe The Different Between Some Resolutions Like 2560×1080 (21,333:9) And 3440×1440 (21,5:9) Are So Small That It Don't Give Much Of A Notable Different When Used With A Smaller Resolution, So Maybe 2560x1080 Users Can Use 3440x1440 Skins Without Much Problems, But That Only Testing Can Tell. (I Don't Know A Lot Of Skinning So I Am Probably Wrong And Precise Resolution In The Assets Matters IDK).