forum

Poll: Do you think 'Divine Highs and Lows' will get a negative reception?

posted
Total Posts
27

Do you think 'Divine Highs and Lows' will get a negative reception?

Yes
24
42.11%
No
33
57.89%
Total votes: 57
Polling ended
Topic Starter
_MMMMMM_MMMMMM_
I would like to know what the community really thinks. Answer in all honesty.

Map link: beatmapsets/1197703#taiko/2494726



EDIT: there was a mistake with the poll title (my bad, now fixed) please re-vote!
9_9
stop asking dumb questions and rank it already
ndrrr
rank it already
Cychloryn
careful not to be misled by the title of this thread, cuz it's basically the opposite of the poll question lol
Metzo
yea the title was confusing af lmaooo
trollocat
why do we need to do this to rank a perfectly fine beatmap, I have no clue, imagine having to do all this to rank every single map lol if it's easier than its SR is not the song nor mapper fault
amge
Just Rank It
vrnl
Go
X a v y
rank it, no reason why the current SR system should hold you back
Topic Starter
_MMMMMM_MMMMMM_

Cychloryn wrote:

careful not to be misled by the title of this thread, cuz it's basically the opposite of the poll question lol
You're right. Now I edited the title. Ty.
Genjuro
No don't rank it, I don't like the song.
Whulf
you should rank it, there's nothing wrong or concerning with it.
Jintsuu
There's literally nothing wrong w/ the map
6_6
saying "theres nothing wrong" is just being ignorant to the pp system abuse, sure double spam is a star rating issue thats going to be fixed sometime soon(?) but in that case just wait for the sr change before ranking honestly
well played tho m6 lol
amge
the map is fine the pp system isnt ! :]
Topic Starter
_MMMMMM_MMMMMM_

FusRoYay wrote:

saying "theres nothing wrong" is just being ignorant to the pp system abuse, sure double spam is a star rating issue thats going to be fixed sometime soon(?) but in that case just wait for the sr change before ranking honestly
well played tho m6 lol
I don't see any "PP system abuse" on the map. And that's not my intention either. As in all my maps, I map exactly what sounds in the song and maintain musical consistency. That's what I did with this map.
This map has a concept, which is going from easy to hard, and vice versa. You can see that this is the intention of the song.
I think you are wrong: there is no "pp system abuse", we have an SR system that needs to be fixed.
roufou
I think it will, although if it were up to me, negative reception is not what gatekeeps me from ranking the map if I could.

I personally wouldn't want to rank a map that is basically a kantan for 5 minutes or something and has 1 minute of oni difficulty. From my perspective it's not suitable for rank, maybe for loved. Of course I don't really care if BNs decide to rank it, I don't personally agree with the decision, but it's not like that is gonna be the reason for me to be bothered by this game.

Basically I don't really care about negative reception, at least so long as that negative reception is due to pp "abuse". I unfortunately can't support ranking a map I think very few people would actually enjoy playing, just my opinion though.

edit: I might give in if people begged me, which maybe is the point of this thread. But I'd need to consider it.
Faputa
Please give evidence on the statement that the BNG as a whole rejects this or is it certain BNs you have found did. Or I can assume that you are pulling a straw man to attempt to deceive others to your advantage
DeletedUser_6637817
Holding a poll to determine community consensus about whether a map should be ranked is unsuitable unless the poll reaches 500~ participants (That number roughly corresponds to the amount of skilled players that are in the target audience of the map).

Also i second Faputas statement.
Stefan
Hey, why did you request this in my closed form >:[
DeletedUser_4115718

Nepuri wrote:

Holding a poll to determine community consensus about whether a map should be ranked is unsuitable unless the poll reaches 500~ participants (That number roughly corresponds to the amount of skilled players that are in the target audience of the map).

Also i second Faputas statement.
Proposal: you and Faputa qualify the map.

This way the community at large will be made aware of the map, and in turn they can be directed back to this thread so that we can reach a consensus. On the sixth/seventh day, a BN may place a veto if they feel like it.

Simple, no?
Faputa
I have no interest in doing that. Thanks for your splendid proposal
DeletedUser_6637817

Nepuri wrote:

Holding a poll to determine community consensus about whether a map should be ranked is unsuitable unless the poll reaches 500~ participants (That number roughly corresponds to the amount of skilled players that are in the target audience of the map).

Also i second Faputas statement.
Addendum:

I additionally believe the poll in itself (even if it reached extraordinary participation) is also not nevessarily a key on its own to convince/force BNs to nominate any map as the BNs are principally free to choose what they nominate.
Ephemeral
the only time a poll determines when a map gets a scoreboard is in Project Loved and pretty much nowhere else
9_9
i will pay yall to rank it
Genjuro
It's hypocritical of you to claim that maps don't get rejected from ranked due to community reaction.

Here's a relatively recent example where exactly that happened: beatmapsets/1052935#taiko/2200414

I don't see how it is unreasonable to ask for the opinion of the community before attempting to push your map to ranked in this context.
Loctav
Quite a pointless thread. Neither is the poll representative, nor does it mean anything to the process itself.

If you want to find out whether or not it will get a negative reception, just get it Ranked and see.
But for that, you need BNs to nominate it.

So this thread is doomed to argue about assumptions endlessly. Therefore, this thread is pointless.

I'll lock this until you can tell me how arguing about assumptions isn't just stirring the pot needlessly.
Please sign in to reply.

New reply