/in
MDRRRR pas mal celle laI AM VERY SMART wrote:
coste tn[RUE]Bambinex wrote:
/in ou uqoi la
nopeGamlA wrote:
I can't tell if the post meant to be serious or not...
editing your post eh? That's pretty suspiciousGamlA wrote:
sorry i may be overanalysing this
Do not edit your post and you have been warned. If you do wish to do so, please EBWOP (edit By Way Of (Double) Post).GamlA wrote:
Last edited by GamlA 34 minutes ago, edited 1 time in total.
You voted before me I hate u VOTE: GamlAsamX500 wrote:
editing your post eh? That's pretty suspiciousGamlA wrote:
sorry i may be overanalysing this
Vote:GamIA
Edited something scummy out I see?GamlA wrote:
sorry i may be overanalysing this
My mistake. Noted.heipizhu wrote:
Do not edit your post and you have been warned. If you do wish to do so, please EBWOP (edit By Way Of (Double) Post).GamlA wrote:
Last edited by GamlA 34 minutes ago, edited 1 time in total.
ur late joonJoon Yorigami wrote:
hello everyone
I haven't even did anythingI AM VERY SMART wrote:
Alright so Rezq what do you have to say about the two mafia goons voting you?
Rezq wrote:
I haven't even did anythingI AM VERY SMART wrote:
Alright so Rezq what do you have to say about the two mafia goons voting you?
vote:GamlA
[b]VOTE: Player[/b]
That's rightnominomu wrote:
wait, we're one away?
VOTE: No execution
(i hope i typed that right)
Probably, his actions don't seem to be suspicious either.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
GamlA is 100% a vanilla townie because too many people vote for them...
Why thank you...I AM VERY SMART wrote:
GamlA is 100% a vanilla townie because too many people vote for them...
“June”heipizhu wrote:
Julian_Kaiser, Joon Yorigami and ClevelandMyBro still haven't confirmed their role yet, and [RUE]Bambinex is V/LA from 7 June to 21 June.
I'll start looking for a replacement for [RUE]Bambinex now, and I'll also look for replacement for Julian, Joon and Cleveland if the 3 players aren't able to confirm in 24 hours.
Quickhammer bruhWELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA
Sorry, fixedYyottaCat wrote:
“June”heipizhu wrote:
Julian_Kaiser, Joon Yorigami and ClevelandMyBro still haven't confirmed their role yet, and [RUE]Bambinex is V/LA from 7 June to 21 June.
I'll start looking for a replacement for [RUE]Bambinex now, and I'll also look for replacement for Julian, Joon and Cleveland if the 3 players aren't able to confirm in 24 hours.
heipizhu wrote:
CleverlandMyBro has confirmed
WhyClevelandsMyBro wrote:
??
yall even read the rules/setup yet?
Last edited by ClevelandsMyBro 2 minutes ago, edited 1 time in total.
ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
??
yall even read the rules/setup yet?
Last edited by ClevelandsMyBro 2 minutes ago, edited 1 time in total.
heipizhu wrote:
Obfuscation, including post editing, steganography, hexadecimal, Base64 and classical or modern cryptography, cannot be used by anyone except the moderator.
the fuck did i do??? .·°՞(≧□≦)՞°·.heipizhu wrote:
ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
??
yall even read the rules/setup yet?
Last edited by ClevelandsMyBro 2 minutes ago, edited 1 time in total.heipizhu wrote:
Obfuscation, including post editing, steganography, hexadecimal, Base64 and classical or modern cryptography, cannot be used by anyone except the moderator.
FClevelandsMyBro wrote:
the fuck did i do??? .·°՞(≧□≦)՞°·.heipizhu wrote:
ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
??
yall even read the rules/setup yet?
Last edited by ClevelandsMyBro 2 minutes ago, edited 1 time in total.heipizhu wrote:
Obfuscation, including post editing, steganography, hexadecimal, Base64 and classical or modern cryptography, cannot be used by anyone except the moderator.
If that's the plan, let's do it man.samX500 wrote:
I think we got enough action out of voting GamlA.
Now let's vote for the other post editor
VOTE: ClevelandsMyBro
btw Gam1A, you voted for yourself stating that the game was affecting your mental state in a negative way, then just 1 day after you unvote yourself? Is the game suddenly not affecting you after just one day?GamlA wrote:
This is affecting my mental state in a negative way right now so...
VOTE: GamlA
I got over it.samX500 wrote:
btw Gam1A, you voted for yourself stating that the game was affecting your mental state in a negative way, then just 1 day after you unvote yourself? Is the game suddenly not affecting you after just one day?GamlA wrote:
This is affecting my mental state in a negative way right now so...
VOTE: GamlA
You are very quick to make that assumption, in this game there are two teams of two scum. Only 5 people had voted for them by the time you posted this message, that isn't much, especially since scum teams are so small.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
GamlA is 100% a vanilla townie because too many people vote for them...
I agree with this.samX500 wrote:
You are very quick to make that assumption, in this game there are two teams of two scum. Only 5 people had voted for them by the time you posted this message, that isn't much, especially since scum teams are so small.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
GamlA is 100% a vanilla townie because too many people vote for them...
Now why would you make such a quick assumption? Trying to cover for your scum partner perhaps?
Vote: I AM VERY SMART
Wagon hopping at E-2 does seem suspicious. If your scum partner just happened to be online you could’ve easily gotten rid of GamlA.WELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA
Same, that's very suspicious from smartyYyottaCat wrote:
I agree with this.samX500 wrote:
You are very quick to make that assumption, in this game there are two teams of two scum. Only 5 people had voted for them by the time you posted this message, that isn't much, especially since scum teams are so small.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
GamlA is 100% a vanilla townie because too many people vote for them...
Now why would you make such a quick assumption? Trying to cover for your scum partner perhaps?
Vote: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
i think i agreeAireunaeus wrote:
Same, that's very suspicious from smartyYyottaCat wrote:
I agree with this.samX500 wrote:
You are very quick to make that assumption, in this game there are two teams of two scum. Only 5 people had voted for them by the time you posted this message, that isn't much, especially since scum teams are so small.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
GamlA is 100% a vanilla townie because too many people vote for them...
Now why would you make such a quick assumption? Trying to cover for your scum partner perhaps?
Vote: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
Yes I agree toonominomu wrote:
i think i agreeAireunaeus wrote:
Same, that's very suspicious from smartyYyottaCat wrote:
I agree with this.samX500 wrote:
You are very quick to make that assumption, in this game there are two teams of two scum. Only 5 people had voted for them by the time you posted this message, that isn't much, especially since scum teams are so small.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
GamlA is 100% a vanilla townie because too many people vote for them...
Now why would you make such a quick assumption? Trying to cover for your scum partner perhaps?
Vote: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
Are you okay?I AM VERY SMART wrote:
Yes I agree toonominomu wrote:
i think i agreeAireunaeus wrote:
Same, that's very suspicious from smartyYyottaCat wrote:
I agree with this.samX500 wrote:
You are very quick to make that assumption, in this game there are two teams of two scum. Only 5 people had voted for them by the time you posted this message, that isn't much, especially since scum teams are so small.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
GamlA is 100% a vanilla townie because too many people vote for them...
Now why would you make such a quick assumption? Trying to cover for your scum partner perhaps?
Vote: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
VOTE: I AM VERY SMART
I just said that GamlA is safe because too many people vote for them.YyottaCat wrote:
Please clear yourself, I AM VERY SMART.
I am not trying to eliminate you, I just want to make people talk so that this game goes anywhere. If you don't talk, you are not helping town find who the scums are.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
I just said that GamlA is safe because too many people vote for them.YyottaCat wrote:
Please clear yourself, I AM VERY SMART.
But of course I am defending my scum partner, of course.
"I am not trying to eliminate you" and you're doing the exact opposite by voting me. The moment a player vote someone, everyone will follow them for no reason because it's the only thing to do. I just said that GamlA was safe because too many votes in a short period of time and everyone is already on me.samX500 wrote:
I am not trying to eliminate you, I just want to make people talk so that this game goes anywhere. If you don't talk, you are not helping town find who the scums are.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
I just said that GamlA is safe because too many people vote for them.YyottaCat wrote:
Please clear yourself, I AM VERY SMART.
But of course I am defending my scum partner, of course.
woah woah 😨I AM VERY SMART wrote:
"I am not trying to eliminate you" and you're doing the exact opposite by voting me. The moment a player vote someone, everyone will follow them for no reason because it's the only thing to do. I just said that GamlA was safe because too many votes in a short period of time and everyone is already on me.samX500 wrote:
I am not trying to eliminate you, I just want to make people talk so that this game goes anywhere. If you don't talk, you are not helping town find who the scums are.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
I just said that GamlA is safe because too many people vote for them.YyottaCat wrote:
Please clear yourself, I AM VERY SMART.
But of course I am defending my scum partner, of course.
Just f*ck this and kill me already 🖕
bro defeatism gets u nowhere. Your reaction is inherently bad in the sense that assuming you're town, you want the number of townies to decrease. It's losing for your faction if you're town, and if you're not town, you're clearly doing this for the show of it and to get people off you (by the logic scum shouldn't want to die). I'm looking for suspects right now, and not an elimination.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
"I am not trying to eliminate you" and you're doing the exact opposite by voting me. The moment a player vote someone, everyone will follow them for no reason because it's the only thing to do. I just said that GamlA was safe because too many votes in a short period of time and everyone is already on me.samX500 wrote:
I am not trying to eliminate you, I just want to make people talk so that this game goes anywhere. If you don't talk, you are not helping town find who the scums are.I AM VERY SMART wrote:
I just said that GamlA is safe because too many people vote for them.YyottaCat wrote:
Please clear yourself, I AM VERY SMART.
But of course I am defending my scum partner, of course.
Just f*ck this and kill me already 🖕
uhhhhhhhhhh why are you talking about claiming this early, this is quite a vanilla setup.Joon Yorigami wrote:
should we make claims or
Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
why is there a shocking lack of content in this game apart from literal LOLwagons. or is this how the sitemeta is?
Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
I just realized both of the wagons so far have self-voters. WTF. Guys play the damn game.
my apologiesShaun_CCGeek wrote:
okay so roughly 3 days till deadline and we are just past RVS... uh... people should probably exist here.
I am unsure how a sarcastic apology applies to all three of the quoted posts, when the first question is not something that demands one, the second qn is not even directed at you, and the third one I can probably understand, but surely you can interact with some kind of content than filler to disprove me?ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
why is there a shocking lack of content in this game apart from literal LOLwagons. or is this how the sitemeta is?Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
I just realized both of the wagons so far have self-voters. WTF. Guys play the damn game.my apologiesShaun_CCGeek wrote:
okay so roughly 3 days till deadline and we are just past RVS... uh... people should probably exist here.
idk how worthwhile this is, but one thing I found odd while looking back at activity is that WELUVMYUKA said they were "following the vote", but only after 3 players had already begun to defend Gam1AWELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA
nahShaun_CCGeek wrote:
I am unsure how a sarcastic apology applies to all three of the quoted posts, when the first question is not something that demands one, the second qn is not even directed at you, and the third one I can probably understand, but surely you can interact with some kind of content than filler to disprove me?ClevelandsMyBro wrote:
Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
why is there a shocking lack of content in this game apart from literal LOLwagons. or is this how the sitemeta is?Shaun_CCGeek wrote:
I just realized both of the wagons so far have self-voters. WTF. Guys play the damn game.my apologiesShaun_CCGeek wrote:
okay so roughly 3 days till deadline and we are just past RVS... uh... people should probably exist here.
first day clusterfuck + first ever game of mafia for half of the players here.samX500 wrote:
idk how worthwhile this is, but one thing I found odd while looking back at activity is that WELUVMYUKA said they were "following the vote", but only after 3 players had already begun to defend Gam1AWELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA
lmao, well we'll just have to wait and see who gets killed or smthShaun_CCGeek wrote:
like i think the only way this game progress is by having I AM VERY SMART interact with us, because that's our only promising lead rn
That’s what I saidsamX500 wrote:
idk how worthwhile this is, but one thing I found odd while looking back at activity is that WELUVMYUKA said they were "following the vote", but only after 3 players had already begun to defend Gam1AWELUVMYUKA wrote:
I'll follow the votes
VOTE: GamlA