The question still remains: why did you roleclaim in the first place?
Didn't we need some action in here?0_o wrote:
The question still remains: why did you roleclaim in the first place?
As far as I know, it's not breaking the rules to say how your role works, or how you win, nor is it against the rules for you yourself to ask the mod so that you know how you win.DeathxShinigami wrote:
Didn't we need some action in here?0_o wrote:
The question still remains: why did you roleclaim in the first place?
@ Lady, Does it look like I wanna rulebreak?
Seriously, this is hectic...
I believe what he's saying is that he appears to be the opposite faction. So say he copies a Townie Cop. He would appear to be mafia for any sane person that investigated him, or when he is lynched. Of course, since he suggests that he can copy again after being lynched, maybe lynching him automatically failsbmin11 wrote:
This is too much of an action AHHHHHHHHHHHHH
and I still don't get your objective. Since you are saying it's an opposite alignment, do you have to kill your copy or something?
Either that, or his role is a self-revival style role.Lybydose wrote:
I believe what he's saying is that he appears to be the opposite faction. So say he copies a Townie Cop. He would appear to be mafia for any sane person that investigated him, or when he is lynched. Of course, since he suggests that he can copy again after being lynched, maybe lynching him automatically failsbmin11 wrote:
This is too much of an action AHHHHHHHHHHHHH
and I still don't get your objective. Since you are saying it's an opposite alignment, do you have to kill your copy or something?
He also says:Lybydose wrote:
Of course, since he suggests that he can copy again after being lynched, maybe lynching him automatically fails
DeathxShinigami wrote:
Nah, I'm just someone else's double so I'd take the hit instead.
Fun to be the decoy, gets us to night faster eh?
I half-win if I killed the person who I copied. That's it besides swapping alignment to other players.Wojjan wrote:
well then what was your original win condition, before it changed?
I copied bmin.Wojjan wrote:
who did you copy? We have a mislynch so we may very well waste it on them.
Cause I reverse aligned copied you.bmin11 wrote:
I don't like the way things are going. Why am I being lynched?
Yes, but lynching you accomplishes the same thing, and you statistically have a higher chance of turning mafia than bmin does. Unless I'm missing something..DeathxShinigami wrote:
Like I said, it's a 2 for 1 deal if we lynch bmin
You find out what his alignment was and what mine is since I copied him. Unless you really think just lynching me helps faceman.
That's what I've been saying.Lybydose wrote:
Don't we also find out DxS's alignment if we lynch him?
We can then deduce bmin's alignment because it would just be the opposite.
we still get to deduce DxS' alignment, if what he's been saying about his role is true0_o wrote:
Err guys, why aren't you voting for DxS? There are more townies than mafia; there's a much higher chance that DxS copied a townie than a mafioso.
It's better to find out what bmin is first though before targeting me since i get to know what alignment I actually am once he dies lol...Well of course you would say that, because it means us not lynching you instead.
That's what we've been saying this whole time.naptime wrote:
Wait what. Can you like please get your role figured out? Did you just imply you actually have the same affiliation as bmin11 but are only seen as the opposite affiliation by Cops (as Lybydose originally theorized)?
Unvote bmin11 ugh
So you mean you're actually of the same alignment, with the same abilities?DeathxShinigami wrote:
But here's the deal which I still don't know. Given whatever role bmin has that I copied I'm only seen as the opposite by other abilities.
DeathxShinigami wrote:
I'm the opposite of whatever alignment of the person I copied and it's my goal for my real host to win. So I'm town/neutral/mafia
The second quote makes it seem like he's stating his new modified win condition. "Just a minor chance but whew..."DeathxShinigami wrote:
I half-win if I killed the person who I copied. That's it besides swapping alignment to other players.Wojjan wrote:
well then what was your original win condition, before it changed?
Just a minor change but whew...
Two other posts which add to the confusion around his role.DeathxShinigami wrote:
I have no idea how my alignment flips but it seems to be whatever the opposite of whoever I copied (thanks host)
But here's the deal which I still don't know. Given whatever role bmin has that I copied I'm only seen as the opposite by other abilities.
I have a better feeling from his other posts in general since it has an "I'm town, what the hell are you doing" feeling. Being a newb villager in epicmafia and having a bandwagon on me had me produced a similar smacking of desperation.bmin11 wrote:
Hey and you guys are ending up killing an innocent while you guys could have taken your chance to kill those bad guys! and your alignment thing isn't confirmed at all! This is suicidal
I doubt he picked his role specifically, he just PM'd a person/place/thing/abstract concept that he liked and was given his powers.adam2046 wrote:
I would like to ask why you picked your role DxS.
I know, I want to know why he chose that in particular.Lybydose wrote:
I doubt he picked his role specifically, he just PM'd a person/place/thing/abstract concept that he liked and was given his powers.adam2046 wrote:
I would like to ask why you picked your role DxS.
I consider jester the least likely of the possibilities. It's still a possibility, but seems somewhat unlikely.Firo Prochainezo wrote:
This is so confusing and I'm fondly suspicious of DxS's role and he, like LadySuburu said, might be a jester. I don't see the reason why DxS copied bmin other than confusing the fuck out of us. I'll still wait and see what happens.
You copy someone and get their power. Your REAL alignment will change to opposite of the one you copied.From what I understood, I think he meant this.
Deadline is Sunday noon GMT. 50 Hours, to be exact.Did I miss something?
The second post shows the dead players list.0_o wrote:
mod: Could you separate the living/dead players in the OP?
So it's Role names and alignment only. The ability and everything will be revealed after the game ends.tastelikecoke wrote:
Role names are revealed. Alignment is also revealed.Lybydose wrote:
mod: are roles revealed on death? If not, what about alignment?
Flavor writing is not that significant. those 6 players are confirmed dead dead Dead.intermu wrote:
Also small observation; if the flavor writing is of any significance, only three is actually confirmed dead (counting out the dunning kruger effect since idk what to make out of it).
The only thing off about this is that Bear Grylls was classified as neutral, while Rebecca Black was independent. I'm not sure if they are the same thing or not, but wouldn't it make more sense for a survivor to be of an independent alignment?Lybydose wrote:
Since the person DxS copied was a neutral aligned person named Bear Grylls, it's very likely that he's some sort of Survivor role that wins if he's alive at the end, and it would certainly explain his confusion over his win condition. He might have additional powers, but I doubt they would really be anti-town, probably something that helps himself survive. I don't think it would be best for us to lynch him since there are still an unknown number of mafia running around, and none have died yet.
Yeah I noticed that. My reasoning is that a neutral character is indifferent towards the various factions. The survivor fits perfectly because he wins if any other faction wins. Contrast this with independent, which suggests a faction of it's own. Unlike the neutral faction, the independent faction is not indifferent towards everyone else. They want everyone else dead and/or recruited to their faction (such as a cult leader).0_o wrote:
The only thing off about this is that Bear Grylls was classified as neutral, while Rebecca Black was independent. I'm not sure if they are the same thing or not, but wouldn't it make more sense for a survivor to be of an independent alignment?Lybydose wrote:
Since the person DxS copied was a neutral aligned person named Bear Grylls, it's very likely that he's some sort of Survivor role that wins if he's alive at the end, and it would certainly explain his confusion over his win condition. He might have additional powers, but I doubt they would really be anti-town, probably something that helps himself survive. I don't think it would be best for us to lynch him since there are still an unknown number of mafia running around, and none have died yet.
Ah right, I forgot that survivors simply need to be alive at the end and not be the last one standing.Lybydose wrote:
Yeah I noticed that. My reasoning is that a neutral character is indifferent towards the various factions. The survivor fits perfectly because he wins if any other faction wins. Contrast this with independent, which suggests a faction of it's own. Unlike the neutral faction, the independent faction is not indifferent towards everyone else. They want everyone else dead and/or recruited to their faction (such as a cult leader).
Well technically scum is the least likely to get nightkilled. After all, scum usually is the one who nightkills.Kokizi wrote:
ok, so no scum was nightkilled. this isn't going so well is it?