eblf2013 wrote:

Wei Wuxian wrote:

By definition, fanfiction can never be canon

But lots of people seem to forget/not know that.

Lights wrote:

eblf2013 wrote:

Wei Wuxian wrote:

By definition, fanfiction can never be canon

But lots of people seem to forget/not know that.

I do not bear the burden of conforming to reality and therefore the definition of fanfic shall not hinder my ability to create a canon love story between abbykun and flannypie

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

So - from what I hear - you guys want some of the real stuff written about abraker and flanster and you want it fast? I say let's do this, give them the proper backstory that they deserve.

Ashton wrote:

Lights wrote:

eblf2013 wrote:

Wei Wuxian wrote:

By definition, fanfiction can never be canon

But lots of people seem to forget/not know that.

I do not bear the burden of conforming to reality and therefore the definition of fanfic shall not hinder my ability to create a canon love story between abbykun and flannypie

If you write like that in your fan fic you'll make your entire audience sleep on page one.

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

I felt like I've been let down after reading this thread somehow.

samX500 wrote:

Tad Fibonacci wrote:

I felt like I've been let down after reading this thread somehow.

unused bold tags

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

Who should be included in this spicy fanfic?

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

Then you guys should like what I put. Still waiting on other takes as well.

eblf2013 wrote:

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

Then you guys should like what I put. Still waiting on other takes as well.

I'm 90.4% sure JAB or Zelzatter will be there

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

abraker, I am sorry to say it but some facts about you will be revealed

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

So - from what I hear - you guys want some of the real stuff written about abraker and flanster and you want it fast? I say let's do this, give them the proper backstory that they deserve.

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

The true story of abraker and flanster will be revealed soon

abraker wrote:

That's it?

That is it.

Lights wrote:

well you have like 12-24 hours before it becomes a dead meme.

Flanster wrote:

Lights wrote:

well you have like 12-24 hours before it becomes a dead meme.

is it dead yet

Lights wrote:

Flanster wrote:

Lights wrote:

well you have like 12-24 hours before it becomes a dead meme.

is it dead yet

I was going to wait for other people to posts theirs, but since ds96 and ashton are a bunch of scaredy cats, i guess ill do it myself ;p

Wei Wuxian wrote:

Lights wrote:

Flanster wrote:

Lights wrote:

well you have like 12-24 hours before it becomes a dead meme.

is it dead yet

I was going to wait for other people to posts theirs, but since ds96 and ashton are a bunch of scaredy cats, i guess ill do it myself ;p

DS is outlining right now and I'm helping him since I am Experienced™ at this (I have at least 250 works out on the internet across different accounts, I know fanfic very well)

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

I have stumbled across abraker's journal about his job. I have transcribed what is legible here from the first page (which covers two weeks of his work), but do not know how much you guys would want to hear. There is more to it, but I do not know if you guys are ready to hear what happens during the next few weeks.

abraker's journal entry #1

Monday : Today was a horrible day. My tests failed again. I thought that I had all the kinks worked out this time, but all that happened is that the subjects died an hour after taking the initial dose. Though it is an improvement over instantly dying, it is still not enough. Quite honestly, I do not know what made today any different. Subjects were given the same dosage, same conditions. The only difference is that it was given to the subjects right after they woke up instead of midday, per new testing codes implemented. This is going to bother me as I go about the rest of my day as to what really happened.

Thursday : After a few days worth of testing, the subjects now survive about two hours before experiencing side effects, the most common is death. The few who survive longer than that seclude themselves, rock back and forth and murmur. Attempts to communicate with said subjects only leads to being ignored.

Friday : I came in today just to the subjects that survived the experiments yesterday were all dead. When I tried to watch the footage of what happened overnight, I was met with a security clearance check, one above my current level. I was also met with my new supervisor today, named Flanster. When I asked them about the security clearance on trying to study my subjects, he said that he would look into it. At the end of the day, he just said they just never woke up, not to question his findings and just run the tests. I asked if they did any work after the test subjects died and Flanster told me that they were burned per protocol, leaving me with no information as to what to tweak. I have a feeling as to what to change. Let’s just hope that this is the correct move.

Tuesday : It took all weekend but I found a way to make my new product into a stable pill instead of an injection. Flanster watched me intently as I made these attempts, like he was waiting for me to fail. I would not recommend using any of the formulas I put down as I was making this stable pill. Side effects of those versions are unknown, but I would say that there is a high chance of death from those formulas. Flanster will not let me bypass protocols and give subjects the new formula, so tomorrow it is for this.

Wednesday : Ten subjects were brought out this run of my new pill form. Only one died over the course of the day, the rest at varying degrees of sanity. Flanster congratulated me of my efforts, saying that soon all the kinks will be worked out. He gave me a pat on the back (which is against protocol if I can add) as he told me this. I was thinking about reporting this, but he is from a different department. Maybe they do different things there? I can’t say, but I am ready to see how my subjects keep on reacting to my new product.

Thursday : I gave five of my subjects a second dose today and let the rest go without. I have learned that with my current formula that withdrawal from it is deadly; all four died within 4 hours of not receiving a second dose. I will try to make another batch that can be stopped, but for now this current test must finish. We need to know how long that you can take this pill before adverse effects happen.

Lights wrote:

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

I have stumbled across abraker's journal about his job. I have transcribed what is legible here from the first page (which covers two weeks of his work), but do not know how much you guys would want to hear. There is more to it, but I do not know if you guys are ready to hear what happens during the next few weeks.

abraker's journal entry #1

Monday : Today was a horrible day. My tests failed again. I thought that I had all the kinks worked out this time, but all that happened is that the subjects died an hour after taking the initial dose. Though it is an improvement over instantly dying, it is still not enough. Quite honestly, I do not know what made today any different. Subjects were given the same dosage, same conditions. The only difference is that it was given to the subjects right after they woke up instead of midday, per new testing codes implemented. This is going to bother me as I go about the rest of my day as to what really happened.

Thursday : After a few days worth of testing, the subjects now survive about two hours before experiencing side effects, the most common is death. The few who survive longer than that seclude themselves, rock back and forth and murmur. Attempts to communicate with said subjects only leads to being ignored.

Friday : I came in today just to the subjects that survived the experiments yesterday were all dead. When I tried to watch the footage of what happened overnight, I was met with a security clearance check, one above my current level. I was also met with my new supervisor today, named Flanster. When I asked them about the security clearance on trying to study my subjects, he said that he would look into it. At the end of the day, he just said they just never woke up, not to question his findings and just run the tests. I asked if they did any work after the test subjects died and Flanster told me that they were burned per protocol, leaving me with no information as to what to tweak. I have a feeling as to what to change. Let’s just hope that this is the correct move.

Tuesday : It took all weekend but I found a way to make my new product into a stable pill instead of an injection. Flanster watched me intently as I made these attempts, like he was waiting for me to fail. I would not recommend using any of the formulas I put down as I was making this stable pill. Side effects of those versions are unknown, but I would say that there is a high chance of death from those formulas. Flanster will not let me bypass protocols and give subjects the new formula, so tomorrow it is for this.

Wednesday : Ten subjects were brought out this run of my new pill form. Only one died over the course of the day, the rest at varying degrees of sanity. Flanster congratulated me of my efforts, saying that soon all the kinks will be worked out. He gave me a pat on the back (which is against protocol if I can add) as he told me this. I was thinking about reporting this, but he is from a different department. Maybe they do different things there? I can’t say, but I am ready to see how my subjects keep on reacting to my new product.

Thursday : I gave five of my subjects a second dose today and let the rest go without. I have learned that with my current formula that withdrawal from it is deadly; all four died within 4 hours of not receiving a second dose. I will try to make another batch that can be stopped, but for now this current test must finish. We need to know how long that you can take this pill before adverse effects happen.

idk if you've ever read a real journal before, but normally theyre dated, not just days of the week.

Wei Wuxian wrote:

Lights wrote:

DragonSlayer96 wrote:

I have stumbled across abraker's journal about his job. I have transcribed what is legible here from the first page (which covers two weeks of his work), but do not know how much you guys would want to hear. There is more to it, but I do not know if you guys are ready to hear what happens during the next few weeks.

abraker's journal entry #1

Monday : Today was a horrible day. My tests failed again. I thought that I had all the kinks worked out this time, but all that happened is that the subjects died an hour after taking the initial dose. Though it is an improvement over instantly dying, it is still not enough. Quite honestly, I do not know what made today any different. Subjects were given the same dosage, same conditions. The only difference is that it was given to the subjects right after they woke up instead of midday, per new testing codes implemented. This is going to bother me as I go about the rest of my day as to what really happened.

Thursday : After a few days worth of testing, the subjects now survive about two hours before experiencing side effects, the most common is death. The few who survive longer than that seclude themselves, rock back and forth and murmur. Attempts to communicate with said subjects only leads to being ignored.

Friday : I came in today just to the subjects that survived the experiments yesterday were all dead. When I tried to watch the footage of what happened overnight, I was met with a security clearance check, one above my current level. I was also met with my new supervisor today, named Flanster. When I asked them about the security clearance on trying to study my subjects, he said that he would look into it. At the end of the day, he just said they just never woke up, not to question his findings and just run the tests. I asked if they did any work after the test subjects died and Flanster told me that they were burned per protocol, leaving me with no information as to what to tweak. I have a feeling as to what to change. Let’s just hope that this is the correct move.

Tuesday : It took all weekend but I found a way to make my new product into a stable pill instead of an injection. Flanster watched me intently as I made these attempts, like he was waiting for me to fail. I would not recommend using any of the formulas I put down as I was making this stable pill. Side effects of those versions are unknown, but I would say that there is a high chance of death from those formulas. Flanster will not let me bypass protocols and give subjects the new formula, so tomorrow it is for this.

Wednesday : Ten subjects were brought out this run of my new pill form. Only one died over the course of the day, the rest at varying degrees of sanity. Flanster congratulated me of my efforts, saying that soon all the kinks will be worked out. He gave me a pat on the back (which is against protocol if I can add) as he told me this. I was thinking about reporting this, but he is from a different department. Maybe they do different things there? I can’t say, but I am ready to see how my subjects keep on reacting to my new product.

Thursday : I gave five of my subjects a second dose today and let the rest go without. I have learned that with my current formula that withdrawal from it is deadly; all four died within 4 hours of not receiving a second dose. I will try to make another batch that can be stopped, but for now this current test must finish. We need to know how long that you can take this pill before adverse effects happen.

idk if you've ever read a real journal before, but normally theyre dated, not just days of the week.

The dates are redacted

Lyawi wrote:

ship

Aiseca wrote:

Abraker and Flanny had somewhat polar preference. I didn't see them getting shipped in a stable setting.

Flanster wrote:

We aint magnets.

Flanster wrote:

We aint magnets.