1. Finish in 00:41:530 - is really appropriate, if you delete this slider and listen, here is a "Plaaassshhhhh" background sound. The best hitsound for this is a Finish.
2. 00:46:673 (1) - Im following contrabass here, as Fycho said.
3. 01:49:245 (4,5) - Flow is fine here. Any player felt it wrong (and I took a lot of testplays)
4. OD8 is fine, its only 3 diffs maps, not a 7diifs set.

Nwolf wrote:

SPOILER

taiko mod for Ono, a few things were discussed in IRC already

[Oni]

00:26:102 - SV could be improved: http://puu.sh/rt92j/2f6f6485d6.png much better

00:26:745 - COULD BE A COOL NOT FOR A MORE SLOWDOWN EFFECT but you said no already c: exactly

00:49:673 - Feels like an unfitting break, I know it's for less stale rhythm but with the removal of 00:46:459 - and 00:46:245 - becoming big kat it has the same effect with less weird breaks. AKA add a don here done

00:51:816 (2,1) - Finishers?? done


00:55:673 - Could add a kat here for the melody. Generally the kiai feels a little bit empty even with 1/4, as there's a lot of large breaks and unused opportunities.
> 00:59:102 - 01:02:530 - 01:05:959 - 01:09:388 - 01:12:816 - 01:16:245 - 01:19:673 - Same changed whole kiai instead

00:57:388 - Sounds better if this note was 00:57:173 - here instead due to several notes being here in the song. Then it also fits to 01:00:602 (1,2,3,1) - better. done
> 01:04:245 (1) - Same done

01:04:673 (1,2,3) - The color is inconsistent with all other notes on the 3rd beat (which is blue) and I also don't know why there's a triplet here. Okay, variety, sure. Could be a kat triplet at least. Note. It does NOT appear in the 2nd half of the kiai! (01:18:388 - ) ^

01:18:816 (2,3) - Should be removed if we consider 01:11:959 - as the same spot and 01:14:959 (1,2,3,4) - as the variation

01:46:459 (2) - compared to 01:39:602 - on purpose? I don't really mind it, just asking yeah, on purpose. Rise of notes due to the fluet.


[Muzukashii]

00:40:888 - Should have a kat like 00:33:602 (5,6,7,8) - here. Maybe even have this be a 6-plet somehow.
00:40:245 - Actually let a slider start here Oni has a slider too, sliders are beautiful better!

00:55:673 - Same as Oni but this time I'm not pointing out all I wanna stay sane (esp if you deny this) It is possible, indeed. But if you ask me, I find it very fitting since it has a good "Abgang" / "abklang" in these moments which make the upcoming kats be more emphasized.

01:27:388 (2) - Why is this a finisher while 01:23:959 (1) - 01:30:816 (1) - aren't? There's already a difference with it being a kat. 01:34:245 (2) - 01:41:102 (2) - also aren't finishers. E.g. 01:26:959 (1,2) - 1 is already a kat and would take the impact of upcoming note if it would be not a finisher. In all honest Nwolf, I actually don't know how to explain it in english. Der Grund warum ich so viele Lücken habe oder finishers an bestimmten stellen sind ist einfach der, das ich finde, das jene finisher einen sehr guten Abgang einer stanza oder einer bestimmten Note inszenieren. Abgang im Sinne von, die finisher hallen für einen Moment ins Nichts was ihnen und den nachfolgenden Noten mehr kraft verleit. Finisher und Folgenoten sind voneinander getrennt und beziehen sich dadurch nur auf ihre Stanza was dazu führt das die Noten auch für sich mehr Kraft beanspruchen. So gesehen wände ich dieses Mal ein eher "Lokales mapping" an, anstatt ein "Globales" bei dem normalerweise jedes pattern eng mit den vorherigen oder nachkommenden verbunden ist. On the other hand, 01:41:102 (2) - changed to K lol

01:42:388 (5,6,7) - Compared to other things in this diff this feels rather random and out of place, there aren't really 1/4 in this diff. true

01:48:602 (3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - Should be less dense imo. Makes a bigger difference to Oni and doesn't the density of Muzukashii that much. Also Oni has no 1/4 here done


weff