1. Broken (6.6 stars, 1352 notes)
2. remap (0.83 stars, 10 notes)

Plaudible wrote:

first xd

looks a ton better than halcyon, nice job o/ plays very nicely!

1. sick tags. rsi indeed
2. choose custom combo colors

1. 00:25:989 (7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - since the sounds in the music in 7,8 are not nearly as loud as the rest of the stream. this would be cool for emphasis: http://puu.sh/rdVkM/d730f61f32.jpg . completely up to you though
2. 00:26:439 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this pattern would be more aesthetically pleasing if the notes stacked at equal distances, like so: http://puu.sh/rdVs7/d131b0306c.jpg
3. 00:29:889 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - space this part equally if not more than 00:28:839 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - for consistency/emphasis
4. 00:51:039 (7,8,9) - fix blanket http://puu.sh/rdVIw/d01f378dd0.jpg
5. 00:53:139 (4,5) - stack or decrease distance
6. 01:12:039 (1,2,3,4) - consider passively mapping this with repeat sliders. it's difficult for most players to adjust immediate to 1/3,1/6 changes, etc. or consider NCing after each new note http://puu.sh/rdVV8/20b32cdb8e.jpg that also helps indicate changes in rhythm to the player
7. 01:57:639 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NC like this http://puu.sh/rdW7a/60f685b223.jpg
8. 02:06:714 (3,4) - did you mean to put this on the other side of the reverse slider? that's a really big jump
9. 02:16:839 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same thing with NC as before
10. 02:19:839 (3,4) - consider decreasing the size of this jump a tad bit
11. 02:49:239 (1) - holy bpm changes. whoever timed this is a god
12. 03:30:053 (1,1,1,1) - is there a particular reason as to why you chose to NC after each note? it's unnecessary imo
13. 03:43:253 (6,7) - oh you passively mapped the rhythm here. personally I'd go with this: http://puu.sh/rdWx6/9844e0ef6c.jpg or this http://puu.sh/rdWz0/0900c19517.jpg but it's your call
14. 04:02:453 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same

nubery wrote:

Hey there!
NM from #modreqs

This map is 3hardcore5me so I wont be able to playtest. I'll focus on rhythm and aesthetics if that's fine.
Remember, these are all suggestions(unless otherwise stated) so you dont have to agree with me on everything
[General]

1. sick tags. rsi indeed
2. choose custom combo colors

[Broken]

1. 00:25:989 (7,8,9,10,11,12,1) - since the sounds in the music in 7,8 are not nearly as loud as the rest of the stream. this would be cool for emphasis: http://puu.sh/rdVkM/d730f61f32.jpg . completely up to you though I think I prefer how it is now, but I might emphasize this later with hitsounds instead
2. 00:26:439 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - this pattern would be more aesthetically pleasing if the notes stacked at equal distances, like so: http://puu.sh/rdVs7/d131b0306c.jpg fixed, but in a different way, previously was just weird to hit
3. 00:29:889 (8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - space this part equally if not more than 00:28:839 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - for consistency/emphasis with this type of pattern it plays odd, so I chose to emphasize with placement instead of spacing, I hope that's enough but I'll leave this 1 open for now
4. 00:51:039 (7,8,9) - fix blanket http://puu.sh/rdVIw/d01f378dd0.jpg done
5. 00:53:139 (4,5) - stack or decrease distance Nah, 'tis fine
6. 01:12:039 (1,2,3,4) - consider passively mapping this with repeat sliders. it's difficult for most players to adjust immediate to 1/3,1/6 changes, etc. or consider NCing after each new note http://puu.sh/rdVV8/20b32cdb8e.jpg that also helps indicate changes in rhythm to the player There are areas where I definitely should probably passively map but I think this one in particular is fine
7. 01:57:639 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - NC like this http://puu.sh/rdW7a/60f685b223.jpg too messy
8. 02:06:714 (3,4) - did you mean to put this on the other side of the reverse slider? that's a really big jump since sliders r pretty lenient this plays fine
9. 02:16:839 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same thing with NC as before Nah but I changed to "passive mapping" here, instead
10. 02:19:839 (3,4) - consider decreasing the size of this jump a tad bit Nahhh its the height of the main melody there
11. 02:49:239 (1) - holy bpm changes. whoever timed this is a god RIGHT? lmfao
12. 03:30:053 (1,1,1,1) - is there a particular reason as to why you chose to NC after each note? it's unnecessary imo nope fixed
13. 03:43:253 (6,7) - oh you passively mapped the rhythm here. personally I'd go with this: http://puu.sh/rdWx6/9844e0ef6c.jpg or this http://puu.sh/rdWz0/0900c19517.jpg but it's your call think it fits as is
14. 04:02:453 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - same

Nice map! Good luck

Whirl wrote:

this is such a fun map

Bubblun wrote:

From #modreqs doing M4M.

Broken

SPOILER

00:24:039 (1,4) - These sliders are exactly the exact same length and have an equal amount of exaggeration, yet 4 has a more curved shape. To stay within theme, I'd adjust the curve of either slider so they match. nah dont rly see reason to...
00:25:914 - Why not put a note here? Emphasizes 00:25:839 (6) - better
00:27:639 (1,2,3,4) - This part plays and looks very boring compared the the rest of the map. Why not continue the 1/2 hit-circle jumps since this part has slightly more exaggeration? different sounds = different patterns
00:42:939 (2) - Doesn't look good right under 00:42:039 (1) - Either make both sliders have the same curve, or maybe you could do something that looks much better. This is what I have in mind: Ehhh, this kind of makes it harder to read, I think it looks fine under.
00:45:639 (7) - SV change, so why not signal that with an NC? The SV isn't that much different so the notes feel the same, it's hard to notice it. But the SV change is there for downbeat.
00:46:239 (1,2,3,4) - Mapping to the beat here is okay, but you can't stack these 4 notes because they have different levels of exaggeration. If you listen closely, 3 and 4 have slightly more exaggeration. Since not all 4 of these notes shares the same exaggeration, you can make a more interesting pattern. Since you're going with symmetry during this part, I'd suggest either a diagonal square, or one of these:
ok I dig it, applied
00:50:289 (10,11,1) - I understand your reasoning for having 3 triplets this verse, but notice how you have an NC on 1. It's because that note has exaggeration. So I'd suggest changing this triplet into a 1/4 slider and a hit circle. So it puts exaggeration into that last circle. Nawww I like it as is, its consistent and works fine
00:58:689 (6) - Their's a sudden jump in intensity here, which can catch the player off guard because the NC isn't until the next note. I'd remove the NC on the next note and place it on this one. NC is on downbeat, na
01:06:489 (6,7,8) - Since you have SV changes here, you have to apply NC to each one to show it. Not necessarily, no
01:47:139 (2) - Seems a little lame for an Extra. Why not just use a 1/2 Slider and a hit circle?don't need to overmap every part for it to be an extra

[Kamiya] wrote:

From #modreqs

First.
Check your AIMOD .
1） Audio bitrate is higher than 192kbps. Consider recompressing to CBR 192kbps or VBR ~1.0.
2）04:20:603 - Kiai time is toggled on for less than 15 seconds.
you wanna go rank.
have to check those.

Good Luck

HydroCannon13 wrote:

Hey, for m4m

General

[General]

1. mp3 file higher than 192kbps :/
2. turn off countdown?

Broken

[ Broken]

1. 00:44:439 (3) - nc? fixd
2. 01:00:489 (3) - make this a 1/2 slider like 01:00:189 (2)? done
3. 01:28:389 (8) - imo it doesnt have to have so much distance from the previous object, more than the stream before but i think as it is, its too much. also you could try to make it more linear with the slider made linear
4. 01:29:589 (11) - ^ ^
5. 01:44:139 (13) - i was not expecting a sv increase of this magnitude after a fairly low spaced stream. i would do 1.25 instead of 1.5, works much better to me I don't think its so fast to the point of being absolutely unexpected or unplayable; its a great transition to next section too
6. 01:44:439 (1,2) - if you are following the thing making the melody (idk what to call it ;-;) then this should be a 1/2 slider
7. 01:49:539 (2,3) - ^ i am, but i hear these so idk mang
8. 01:50:739 (1) - remove nc fixd
9. 01:52:914 (2,3) - better to make a consistent cursor movement from the slider
10. 01:54:264 (2,3) - ^
11. 02:05:514 (3,4) - ^ part of the style and plays just fine though
12. 01:53:514 (6) - delete it? it doesnt sound like it should be there from the music (the stream should start at (7)) if you listen closely there's definitely a sound there
13. 02:06:339 (2,3,4) - wtf? this is so hard to hit, if you are going to do this the slider should lead into the circles slider leniency makes it easy to leave the slider earlier and hit this pattern, its not too tough, but I'll leave it open
14. 02:06:939 (1) - remove nc
15. 02:07:239 (2) - add nc strong beat audibly starts on (5) and NC in such a way is weird
16. 02:15:339 (6,7,8) - imo should be 2 circles then slider and not the other way around so player clicks on the strong sound at 02:15:489 sound isnt on main melody tho so not as strong and not what im trying to emphasize
17. 02:16:389 - put a circle here? dun
18. 03:20:920 (1) - stop the spinner at the uninherited point? it wasnt originally meant to map the static changed
19. 03:36:053 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - i think this is too spaced, it should be the same spacing as the next part of the stream its such a beaast pattern tho fam
20. 04:02:453 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - nc all of these like you did before? fixed
21. 04:05:753 - should be something here done, ty
    
    Ok thats all, if you have any questions hmu. ty for m4m and good luck ranking!

100bit wrote:

remove "xi four dimensions are these even aimable lol" from tags: 1. you have "xi" in Artist; 2. i think that "four dimensions" not applicable for this track; 3. you don't type memes to tags if you want rank this
also remove "world fragments" from Source because it's not rly source:
[quote="Wiki: Song Setup":1337] Source: Where this song originate from. This field should generally only be included for Anime or Video Game songs, and occasionally for Novelty (Movies, TV, or Internet) songs. If the song is from an anime or video game, or is famous for its use as a TV or movie theme, the title of that source goes here. Rock and Pop songs should generally leave the field blank. This is not to be used for things like album titles.

likejaxirl wrote:

m4m

broken

00:16:839 - i feel like its undermapped untill here, nothing too bad tho I can map it more if people request... but yes I like what I'm emphasizing here
00:33:489 (14) - the curve doesnt align with the stream D: fixed
00:34:839 (1) - erhg i think a symmetric slider would fit better, especially as the following ones are just 3 point sliders confused here but I love this slider nooo hahah
00:45:639 - this section doesnt actually sound like a buildup like your sv changes would indicate I think it does.. subjectivity
01:15:639 (2) - can you try making this more round my putting a normal slider below it and trying to fit it at that? leaving this open need more opinion, i love this slider tho
01:23:889 (11,12,1) - I wouldnt put nc on 1, and I think the spacing shouldnt get bigger after this (or rather, the "triple" shouldnt have lower spacing than the following stream. it just looks weird right now) fixed I think
01:26:514 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - slightly inconsistent spacing, idk if a slider to stream convertion would look better though. overall it looks like you placed some streams by hand and with grid snap on (spoiler: I wouldnt recommend that) uh I'll double check this it looks fine to me I need more opinion
01:50:439 (1) - I dont like fully horizontal or vertical sliders but thats just me I like them heh
01:57:639 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - probably ok but annoying to read. sliders would make it easier to play (same here 04:02:453 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - ) considering this.. leaving open just b/c I don't want to change it just yet I need more testplays to see how it actually plays, most players can hit it fine
02:49:239 - the nightmare of timing - I think the slider velocities should be a bit more constant here (till here 03:20:394 - ) agreed! I'll take a look at this.
04:52:553 (1) - I fear this spinner to nothing is problematic, but its the only way youre getting above 5 min could extend audio.. or make more diffs if this is not acceptable. I think it is, though

I cant play the map so i cant really say much about flow and the like, but it looks alright to me
I hope you wont have to retime it after recompressing the mp3, good luck if you do

good luck with the map mr. mapper

Weriko wrote:

mooooooddd



xi <3

streams <3

asdasd <3

Broken

00:00:639 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - you could make this the same size, and put 1 right in the middle of the triangle sorry confused what you mean here my dude?

00:00:639 (1) - maybe you should use breaks in this section, looks cool (i know.... hp..... so im not sure about this) well, I am trying to rank this so breaks would not work.. but if people want me to map more of this beginning, I can.

00:26:889 (4) - i think you can blanket this with the stream, its not a big fix unbalances pattern tho

00:43:839 (2,3) - small overlap police, not important theres a ton of space tho between the notes hnnng

00:46:239 (1,2) - you should make this circles overlap 00:45:639 (5,6) - the same way I think they do

00:46:389 (2,1,2) - you can put the circle in the middle of the sliders im confused here im sorry

01:00:939 (5,6,7,1) - maybe you should make this a small stream cant find way to fit it..

01:01:839 (1,2,3,4,5) - this rhythm sounds weird, even tho im not sure on how it is o.O uhh.. i think fixed? lolol

01:06:489 (6,7,8) - you should ctrl g 7 because spacing between sliders is 1/4, and also, please mute sliderends so it doesnt sound weird fixed

01:15:639 (2) - is this a ? , if it isnt, then you should make another shape, if it is, then try to pulish it a bit it is, i tried?

01:20:514 (9,10,11,12,13,14,15,1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - the spacing change doesnt look that smooth, and music doesnt make it obvious, so you should make first stream start increasing before keeping this open, nc'd for readability there

01:21:564 (1,2,1,2) - please, dont put sliders on blue ticks but y

01:27:864 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - flow change is weird after the slider, (not sure about this) most testplayers did fine there

01:31:914 (9,10,11,12,13,14,15,1) - i think this should be more spaced ok, i need time to figure out how to do this, though

01:44:439 (1) - i think you can put more triplets on this section, like every 3 white ticks or something i think how i mapped is correct to the beat, cant rly see places for them...

02:21:339 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - i think this should be a stream, or at least dont have the 1/1 circles because of the song intensity BUT ITS SOOO INTENSE it calls for aim

03:06:394 (1) - i think this should be smaller (or not) ok made slightly smaller

02:49:239 (1) - love this part of the songggg, and i think its mapped well, maybe some distancing is weird but idk it is weird, the bpm is weird, hard to be consistent but I tried my best

03:20:788 (1) - maybe you can make a small spinner on the timing point? (it might be too small so idk) confused? what do you mean my friendo

03:30:053 (1,2,3,4,1) - i think you should totally follow song like you did here 03:31:553 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - diff sounds call for diff beats

03:43:653 (2) - this might be a bit weird it is 1/3rd transition, it is weird

03:44:903 (2,8) - maybe put circles here? hwat

04:50:753 (3,4) - this dont follow piano i think, i think 3 should go on blue tick and 4 on yellow before?good catch fixd

okay, i like it, even tho some rhythms were weird, and it needs structuring in some spots :p






Good luck!!!!!!

MikasaSerket wrote:

:u
these spinners aren't really mapped to anything. if anything they're mapped to nothingness :d it's pretty understandable as to why you did them though
03:20:788 (1) - yeah this is fine but like, it should end on 03:25:659 - . but then on 03:28:853 - have a 1/8 slider (to match the static) and on 03:29:303 - have a 1/4 stream to match the piano. Atleast this way, you won't have a spinner just overlapping the piano in the music. It's your choice as to wanting to add a break afterwards. good clal! fixed

04:52:553 (1) - mapped to nothing, worse comes to worse, pull an A-L-I-E-N and extend the mp3 with some re-used parts from the music. if need be, I will! need to speak to BN about this first

00:21:339 (5,6,7) - no reason in the music for there to be a kick slider then a jump to #6. If anything, the object placement should be reversed where there is a kick slider on 00:21:489 - and a full 6 note stream.
fixed in a diff way; just replaced kickslider with a note bc it was previously WAY too tough to hit.

00:25:839 (6) - music supports a possible kickslider tbh. no change for now, music also supports a full stop for emphasis of white tick

01:08:439 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - i like the way these streams are spaced closely together. 01:09:189 - this ruins it though :v, from that point on the streams should gradually increase in spacing as it provides a lot of build-up for 01:12:039 - I would do this if it were not for playability sacrificing, but I'll keep this open and see if I can work it in? idk

03:46:853 - I don't get this kiai placement, that section of the music is similar in comparison to 03:39:653 - so if that's the case, shouldn't the kiai begin there? Kiai should start on 03:49:253 - because that's where the music hits the hardest climax. the music is clearly building up for the most intense part, so it should be in the kiai imo

03:58:403 (6) - Streams that start off with kicksliders usually play very awkwardly mostly in this case because the music doesn't support it as much, would recommend putting the kickslider at the end of the stream to provide a small jump and to play a lot more smoothly. changed, in a different way, for reference incase I need to reverse: kickslider was at x:61, y:233

Guys, can I get feedback? Is this pattern too tough?

04:05:303 - An entire section with possible streams is missed here. The piano is clearly audible so it would make sense to put a stream however you didn't. for a reason of emphasis, yes, I don't think a stream belongs there

MomoHD wrote:

momo mod:

00:25:989 (7,8,9,10,11,12) - id like move this stream to the left or more down cuz it almost looks like its part of the stream right before it imo i dont think this is a big enough deal.. but with requests I can shift the angle of the first stream.

00:51:039 (7,8,9,10,11,12) - again this almost looks like its part of the stream before it, move these away and also maybe put a bit more space between them so they actually look like triples, or just stack them to actually look like normal triples ok fixed i think

00:53:439 (5) - put this behind the 4, no balls !!?

00:59:289 (2) - id put this note on top of the 3 slider intead of under the 1 slider leaving this open

01:01:839 (1,2,3) - this doesnt play that well tBH u should put them in like a triangle or something its rly awkward to play like this changed in diff way

03:36:128 (2,3,4,5,6) - delte thi.s its so cool ???

03:43:253 (1) - tbh this sounds like it could be a repeat slider iDK fixd

04:04:853 (1) - why does it sound like there are more beats u can map after this beat u dont want to map every beat gus??? ???? ?? ? ??? i tried?

04:19:103 (14) - move this farther away fix

04:19:928 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - delte thi.s lolmakeme

04:25:928 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - delte thi.s lol make me

04:38:078 (7) - tbh the way this note is like so far out and making the stream overlap is rly ugly pls move like this note back or something leaving this open

04:48:053 (1,2) - OK DAD is not OK DAD, just make them circles like the last 2 notes lol ok yes it is OK

boii u still gotta work on ur structure a bit. things like this 00:21:489 (6,7,1,7,8,9,10,1) - aren't really good.
Things like this too: 00:25:839 (6,2,5,8,2) - are pretty yuck.

And: 00:28:839 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2). Cool concept but just look at those 2's They're not all spaced similarly and there's no real coherence to which order u make the jumps in / intensity of each one. meby use the ctrl+shift+d thing and then fancify this.

An example of where you could improve is like 00:30:789 (2,2,7), stagger them all the same distance or someth or spacing 00:31:089 (2,5,7) - to be an equally distanced triangle. things like this build structure in ur map

play around with some structuring n stuff, it applies to the whole map, and it builds an awareness of aesthetics in your map

00:33:114 (9,10,11,12,13,14) - could you make this slider fit the curve?

00:34:239 (9) - A new sectiony kinda thing here starts, musically. nc? idk. it'd be appropriate and previews a change in the song.

00:34:839 (1) - nooooooo make secksi slider like dis http://puu.sh/rFX3f/02360fa6ef.jpg

00:38:289 (8,9,1) - Boi i thought i raised u better than this what is this blanket. position yourself at 00:38:139 to see the end circle of the slider, and then blanket it around that.

00:38:289 (8,9,1,1) - blanket these you basically did, just the end curve of the slider isn't really fitting

00:45:639 (5,6,1,2) - space 1,2 evenly under 5,6

00:45:039 (3,4,3,4) - ^

00:46:239 (1,2,3,2,3) - another example of weird structure

00:46:839 (1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2) - are these sv changes important? no real build up yet, still the same song, i dont see a reason to :u

00:46:839 (1,2,3,4) - are u tryna do the monstrata thing? he uses 2 angled sliders rlly, that's it these feel sorta random.

00:51:039 (7,8,9,10,11,12) - no real reason to break flow here, keep it circular. try this: http://puu.sh/rFXna/8a6d871453.jpg flows better, leads into the next section. try to break flow when the song suggests it, it plays a lot better

00:58:839 (1) - not really mapped to anything, no need for a slider :<

00:59:439 (3) - tweak a bit http://puu.sh/rFXvO/79d3e71aa4.jpg

01:15:639 (2) - boii so many points, u dont need all dis

01:17:889 (4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - remake with ctrl+shift+d so the octagon is sex

01:20:439 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - very fitting stream for the music, looks good and plays well, nicely done

01:23:364 (6,12) - stack?

01:23:589 (8,9,10) - on that note though, you really shouldn't break flow here, again. no reason to in the song, unless you do it purposely. either break all the flow for the triples or just flow them all, it's the same sound just lowering in pitch after all. here's what i did: but you're going to have to adjust the stream if u do. http://puu.sh/rFXKM/85903b5791.jpg

01:40:689 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - this is a cool place where you could incorporate structural stuff. make it like a triangular grid!

01:44:139 (13) - this'd be a cool place to break flow! make it a sharp turn in a different direction.

01:44:439 (1,2) - you only do this once, and i dont think this note is necessarily more intense than the rest. map it to the song. it's no different from 01:44:739 (3,4,5), why map it differently? also, you could totally make cooler slider patterns than this. you got neat stuff going on at 01:48:039 (1,2,3) .

01:44:439 (1) - no kiai? ;-;

01:48:039 (1,2,3) - speaking of this, 01:47:139 (2,1,2,3) overall got some weird overlaps.

01:49:839 (4) - going to point these out, because flow can really make or break a song. not trying to say everything has to be circular, but if you break it do so at a place that's appropriate. a downbeat? an intense sound, or something. but i dont see a need to break it here

01:53:439 (5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12) - use the wavy slider technique i showed earlier to make this neater

01:54:639 (5,6,1) - another flow issue. 6 to 1 is fitting, 5 to 6 feels unecessary and awkward, but it's the same sound! keep it consistent, flow wise.

02:01:239 (1,2,3,4) - now here is what you do right. do you see the inherent flow going on here? this is REALLY well done, flow wise. you break the flow at a point that's justifiable, because you're indicating change in the song that's coming up, and yet you maintain circular flow where it's crucial.

i like a point pishifat made in a video on structure/sliders. if the song doesn't change, why should the sliders? you really nail that in ^, where the song repeats and is the same, you maintain the sliders. of course this isn't a set in stone rule, but it makes sense if you think about it and can be great in a practical sense. you also see it a lot in maps these days. you should definitely apply this to curved sliders - use rotation angles, the same one. maps can be super diverse slider wise if you just know how to use them - they don't all have to be unique/different.

02:32:439 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - could you make a neater pattern than this? D: or at least make the arc with ctrl+shift+d or something, idk. you could do the thing where you go back in the same direction at 02:33:039 (5), i say the little pitch change can justify it.

thus far, i dont know. i feel the song could use some creative ways to map it like ^, it feels very plain in a way. experiment and play around with some neat things! especially in the slow parts, you can get a lot more creative.

03:03:595 (3) - this is off timing wise.

03:06:394 (1) - don't feel a slider is appropriate here, the hitsound at the end cuts off the piano in an odd way. just make a hitcircle/

03:20:788 (1) - start this right after 03:20:394 (4), like i'm talkin' 1/4 after it. it feels like it pauses then starts, and it'd feel better if you just start it right after.

03:29:378 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - this glissando is 1/8. maybe do a slider stream sort of thing! like in that one anime card girl thing, i forget what it's called LOL but yea, 1/8 slider streams placed exactly where the notes are would be dope. (use rotation angles, please dont hand place)

03:36:053 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - good wavy

03:49:103 (2,1) - distance feels way too short, it's an intense part of the song and it's a downbeat

03:49:253 (1) - also, start the kiai here instead of earlier, it's where the song really "explodes." also, the SV could pick up, it's a higher pitch, and it could be mapped more intensely than the rest of the song imo. you really need to vamp this section up, it's the big moment

03:54:578- you mapped the blue tick before, there's a sound her etoo

03:58:103 (4,5,6) - poor flow. when doing a 1/4 into a note like this, not only do you have to stop there directly for the single, the fact you made it flow through it into another note at a different velocity makes this really, really hard to hit. snapping here would make it easier to play/read, so perhaps adjust it with rotation so that way players can snap to 03:58:403 (6) - :>

04:00:803 (5,6,7,8,9,1) - blanket?

04:08:303 (10,1) - space this out a bit more, the wide angle flow into a slow part with suddenly low ds is hard to play/read.

04:17:153 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13) - dude you could totally blanket these, it'd be so cool c'mon DDD

04:22:853 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,3) - flow break here is fine, because you do it repeatedly and the song sort of fits with the pauses/intense piano noise in between. nice job

04:25:253 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - lit curves du-04:27:053 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - oh. cmon, make this lit too!

04:27:053 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - make dis shit lit

04:45:728 (6) - NANIIIII get rid of this D:

• 
  don't randomly break flow for no reason unless the song justifies it
  
  remember to map to the song
  
  work on structure, aforementioned ideas are cool ways to build it
  
  be creative-r
  
  go through your map with AR 3 or something again, because it really is a great tool to spot bad aesthetics. may not be as good with a stream map like this, but it can help a bunch.

1. 00:26:439 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - the tiny overlaps on these jumps could be cleaned up if you want
2. 00:31:239 (1) - a mad man would do kicksliders starting here
3. 00:46:839 (1,2,3,4) - I see what you were going for here aesthetically, but I think it was kinda overkill. I think toning down the angles the sliders take against each other would make this part look a lot nicer
4. 00:49:689 (5,6,7,8) - I think that returning to the sameish area for the triple makes this more interesting to play flow wise, you could maybe do something like this (not exactly this, I just kinda moved the triple over and move the 5 some)
5. 00:51:639 (1,2,3) - you could nerf these jumps a bit to make the next few feel stronger
6. 00:53:139 (1) - nc?
7. 00:54:339 (2) - move down some?
8. 00:57:939 (2,3,4,5) - this doesn't look or play very nice because of the wide angles, maybe try something sharper?
9. 01:04:089 (4,5) - maybe custom stack these two?
10. 01:21:789 (2) - move this down and to the right a bit?
11. 01:54:264 (2,3) - sorry for just now mentioning this but I kinda forgot, while I was playing your map i misread some of 01:54:039 (1,2,3) these spacings, because they were so similar visually to 01:54:339 (3,4) this stuff. Maybe get other opinions or just make the 3/4 stuff closer to the object it's coming off of to better differntiate the two.
12. 01:57:639 (1,1,1,1,1,1) - misread these hard and got all 100's lol, i reccomend making the spacing a good bit bigger to be able to read this more reliably (same goes for when this happens again in the future)
13. 02:32:439 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - don't really like the very standard curve of this aesthetically, maybe play around with other things? there's so much more interesting stuff to be done here
14. 02:34:839 (1,2) - subjective, but this slider art is kinda eh xD
15. 02:49:239 (1) - props to whoever timed this stuff lmao
16. 04:06:353 (2,3,4) - why not just use the same slider here? they're not parallel
17. 04:07:853 (7,8,9,10) - wide angle here is kinda meh
18. 04:08:453 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - could do something cooler here too
19. 04:21:803 (1,2,3) - kicksliders?